From the time the Pilgrims arrived on American soil, faith in God played an important part in shaping our nation. Images of Moses adorn the Supreme Court in recognition of the Judeo-Christian origin of our laws. But it was Taxes, loss of Liberty and oppression from a mad king that led our Founding Fathers to write The Declaration of Independence and start The American Revolution. Today, those who stand for these ideals no longer call themselves The Silent Majority because we are silent no more.
How many people remember the debate over the socialized medicine plan called Obamacare? It was only two years ago that the entire liberal news media and every Democrat that could find a friendly microphone were all saying there was no such thing as Death Panels in Barack Hussein Obama's healthcare bill. Well, now that the Supreme Court has upheld this unconstitutional law it seems that liberals have begun to open up the big box of secrets. Now didn't the conservative blogs tell the truth all along? Here is a story from WND.com
Makes shocking admission about
Obamacare, advocates rationing for elderly
A top Democrat strategist and donor who served
as President Obama’s lead auto-industry adviser recently conceded that the
rationing of heath services under Obamacare is “inevitable.” Steven Rattner advocated that such rationing
should target elderly patients, while stating, “We need death
panels.” Rattner serves on the board the New America
Foundation, or NAF, a George Soros-funded think tank that was instrumental in
supporting Obamacare in 2010. Soros’ son, financier Jonathan Soros, is also a
member of the foundation’s board. Rattner was the so-called “car czar,” the lead
auto adviser to the Treasury Department under Obama. Last month, Rattner penned an opinion piece in
the New York Times
titled “Beyond Obamacare” in which he proclaimed “We need death panels” and
argued rationing must be instructed to sustain Obama’s health-care plan. His
comments have been virtually ignored by traditional media as the president
campaign’s for a second term.
If there is a moral to this story it has
to be about trust. Who do you trust and why do you trust them? Do you trust the politicians who lie to you? Do you trust the liberal news media who covered up for those lying politicians? So why do you keep voting for them?
If you acknowledge that the liberal media has lied to you about Obamacare and covered up for the politicians that also lied, then why do you believe anything else they say?
No comments:
Post a Comment
No foreign language comments allowed. English only. If you cannot access the comments window send me an email at Oldironsides@fuse.net.
This blog site uses cookies from Google and from Stat Counter to analyze visitor traffic. The only information captured by these stat counters are your IP address along with your city, state and country. The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires this notice. If you don't want this information recorded you should leave now and don't come back.
My name is Nelson Abdullah. I am 77-years old and after 40 years of working for two major airlines, I retired 15 years ago in 2002, a few months after the 9-11 attack on America. My wife and I have been married for more than 56 years. We celebrated our Golden Anniversary in April 2010.
My wife and I are both lifelong Catholics and registered Republicans.
Our country was created as a Constitutional Republic, a nation of laws, held together by the fabric of the Constitution. The Constitution limits the powers of the government while the first ten amendments, called The Bill of Rights, guarantee the rights of We The People. Defending the Republic.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” —The Declaration of Independence—July 4th, 1776.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No foreign language comments allowed. English only. If you cannot access the comments window send me an email at Oldironsides@fuse.net.