Wednesday, October 31, 2012

The scariest pictures I could find for Halloween.

Less than a week away when every American will be deciding the fate of our beloved Republic. How appropriate that on this Halloween we set out images of witches and goblins and other scary stuff - like a few pictures of a Marxist/socialist Democrat who wants to destroy America. So here are the scariest images I could find.

Have a safe and enjoyable Halloween and don't forget to VOTE next Tuesday. Vote Republican, save the Republic.


Sunday, October 28, 2012

A Jewish Boycott

A Jewish Boycott

A short time ago, Iran's Supreme Leader Grand Ayatollah Ali Khomenei urged the Muslim World to boycott anything and everything that originates with the Jewish people.

In response, Meyer M. Treinkman, a pharmacist, out of the kindness of his heart, offered to assist them in their boycott as follows:

"Any Muslim who has Syphilis must not be cured by Salvarsan discovered by a Jew, Dr. Ehrlich. He should not even try to find out whether he has Syphilis, because the Wasserman Test is the discovery of a Jew. If a Muslim suspects that he has Gonorrhea, he must not seek diagnosis, because he will be using the method of a Jew named Neissner.

"A Muslim who has heart disease must not use Digitalis, a discovery by a Jew, Ludwig Traube.

Should he suffer with a toothache, he must not use Novocaine, a discovery of the Jews, Widal and Weil.

If a Muslim has Diabetes, he must not use Insulin, the result of research by Minkowsky, a Jew. If one has a headache, he must shun Pyramidon and Antypyrin, due to the Jews, Spiro and Ellege.

Muslims with convulsions must put up with them because it was a Jew, Oscar Leibreich, who proposed the use of Chloral Hydrate.

Arabs must do likewise with their psychic ailments because Freud, father of psychoanalysis, was a Jew.

Should a Muslim child get Diphtheria, he must refrain from the “Schick" reaction which was invented by the Jew, Bella Schick.

"Muslims should be ready to die in great numbers and must not permit treatment of ear and brain damage, work of Jewish Nobel Prize winner, Robert Baram.

They should continue to die or remain crippled by Infantile Paralysis because the discoverer of the anti-polio vaccine is a Jew, Jonas Salk.

"Muslims must refuse to use Streptomycin and continue to die of Tuberculosis because a Jew, Zalman Waxman, invented the wonder drug against this killing disease.

Muslim doctors must discard all discoveries and improvements by dermatologist Judas Sehn Benedict, or the lung specialist, Frawnkel, and of many other world renowned Jewish scientists and medical experts.

"In short, good and loyal Muslims properly and fittingly should remain afflicted with Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Heart Disease, Headaches, Typhus, Diabetes, Mental Disorders, Polio Convulsions and Tuberculosis and be proud to obey the Islamic boycott."

Oh, and by the way, don't call for a doctor on your cell phone because the cell phone was invented in Israel by a Jewish engineer.

Meanwhile I ask, what medical contributions to the world have the Muslims made?"

The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000; that is ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION or 20% of the world's population.

They have received the following Nobel Prizes:

1988 - Najib Mahfooz

1978 - Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
1990 - Elias James Corey
1994 - Yaser Arafat:
1999 - Ahmed Zewai



1960 - Peter Brian Medawar
1998 - Ferid Mourad


The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000; that is FOURTEEN MILLION or about 0.02% of the world's population.

They have received the following Nobel Prizes:

1910 - Paul Heyse
1927 - Henri Bergson
1958 - Boris Pasternak
1966 - Shmuel Yosef Agnon
1966 - Nelly Sachs
1976 - Saul Bellow
1978 - Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 - Elias Canetti
1987 - Joseph Brodsky
1991 - Nadine Gordimer World

1911 - Alfred Fried
1911 - Tobias Michael Carel Asser
1968 - Rene Cassin
1973 - Henry Kissinger
1978 - Menachem Begin
1986 - Elie Wiesel
1994 - Shimon Peres
1994 - Yitzhak Rabin

1905 - Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 - Henri Moissan
1907 - Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 - Gabriel Lippmann
1910 - Otto Wallach
1915 - Richard Willstaetter
1918 - Fritz Haber
1921 - Albert Einstein
1922 - Niels Bohr
1925 - James Franck
1925 - Gustav Hertz
1943 - Gustav Stern
1943 - George Charles de Hevesy
1944 - Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 - Felix Bloch
1954 - Max Born
1958 - Igor Tamm
1959 - Emilio Segre
1960 - Donald A. Glaser
1961 - Robert Hofstadter
1961 - Melvin Calvin
1962 - Lev Davidovich Landau
1962 - Max Ferdinand Perutz
1965 - Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 - Julian Schwinger
1969 - Murray Gell-Mann
1971 - Dennis Gabor
1972 - William Howard Stein
1973 - Brian David Josephson
1975 - Benjamin Mottleson
1976 - Burton Richter
1977 - Ilya Prigogine
1978 - Arno Allan Penzias
1978 - Peter L Kapitza
1979 - Stephen Weinberg
1979 - Sheldon Glashow
1979 - Herbert Charles Brown
1980 - Paul Berg
1980 - Walter Gilbert
1981 - Roald Hoffmann
1982 - Aaron Klug
1985 - Albert A. Hauptman
1985 - Jerome Karle
1986 - Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 - Robert Huber
1988 - Leon Lederman
1988 - Melvin Schwartz
1988 - Jack Steinberger
1989 - Sidney Altman
1990 - Jerome Friedman
1992 - Rudolph Marcus
1995 - Martin Perl
2000 - Alan J. Heeger

1970 - Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 - Simon Kuznets
1972 - Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 - Leonid Kantorovich
1976 - Milton Friedman
1978 - Herbert A. Simon
1980 - Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 - Franco Modigliani
1987 - Robert M. Solow
1990 - Harry Markowitz
1990 - Merton Miller
1992 - Gary Becker
1993 - Robert Fogel

1908 - Elie Metchnikoff
1908 - Paul Erlich
1914 - Robert Barany
1922 - Otto Meyerhof
1930 - Karl Landsteiner
1931 - Otto Warburg
1936 - Otto Loewi
1944 - Joseph Erlanger
1944 - Herbert Spencer Gasser
1945 - Ernst Boris Chain
1946 - Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 - Tadeus Reichstein
1952 - Selman Abraham Waksman
1953 - Hans Krebs
1953 - Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 - Joshua Lederberg
1959 - Arthur Kornberg
1964 - Konrad Bloch
1965 - Francois Jacob
1965 - Andre Lwoff
1967 - George Wald
1968 - Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 - Salvador Luria
1970 - Julius Axelrod
1970 - Sir Bernard Katz
1972 - Gerald Maurice Edelman
1975 - Howard Martin Temin
1976 - Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 - Roselyn Sussman Yalow
1978 - Daniel Nathans
1980 - Baruj Benacerraf
1984 - Cesar Milstein
1985 - Michael Stuart Brown
1985 - Joseph L. Goldstein
1986 - Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 - Gertrude Elion
1989 - Harold Varmus
1991 - Erwin Neher
1991 - Bert Sakmann
1993 - Richard J. Roberts
1993 - Phillip Sharp
1994 - Alfred Gilman
1995 - Edward B. Lewis
1996- Lu RoseIacovino

TOTAL: 129!
The problem with Islam in the 21st Century is that Islam still wants to live in the 7th Century, along with its barbaric 1400-year old laws and customs. Islam was founded sometime after 610 A.D. In the field of medicine, some modern-day Islamic clerics still quote passages from the 7th Century Hadith's and have issued Fatwas, official religious decrees, that say 'drinking camel urine will cure the sick'. Here is a partial quote from a lengthy dissertation on this subject from an authoritarian Muslim web site
Praise be to Allaah.
The hadeeth referred to by the questioner is a saheeh hadeeth, in which it says that some people came to Madeenah and fell sick. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) told them to drink the milk and urine of camels, and they recovered and grew fat. In the story it also says that they apostatized and killed the camel-herder, then the Muslims caught them and executed them. Narrated by al-Bukhaari (2855) and Muslim (1671). 
With regard to the health benefits of drinking the milk and urine of camels, they are many, and they are well known to the earlier generations of medical science and they have been proven by modern scientific research. 
Ibn al-Qayyim said: 
The author of al-Qanoon (the Canon) – i.e. the doctor Ibn Seena (Avicenna) – said: 
The most beneficial of urine is the urine of Bedouin camels which are called najeeb. End quote. 
Zaad al-Ma’aad (4/47, 48). 
In the Emirati newspaper al-Ittihaad (issue no. 11172, Sunday 6 Muharram 1427 AH/5 February 2006) it says: 
One of the most important things for which camels are raised is their milk, which is efficacious in treating many illnesses, including hepatitis, and the digestive system in general, various types of cancer and other diseases. 
In an article by Dr Ahlaam al-‘Awadi, which was published in al-Da’wah magazine, issue no. 1938, 25 Safar 1425 AH/15 April 2004 CE, about the diseases which can be treated with camel’s milk, as proven by experience, it says that there are many benefits in camel’s milk. There follows some of what was said in the article by Dr. Ahlaam: 
Camel’s urine is efficacious in the treatment of skin diseases such as ringworm, tinea and abscesses, sores that may appear on the body and hair, and dry and wet ulcers. Camel’s urine brings the secondary benefits of making the hair lustrous and thick, and removing dandruff from the scalp. Camel’s milk is also beneficial in treating hepatitis, even if it has reached an advanced stage where medicine is unable to treat it. End quote. 
In the al-Jazeerah al-Sa’oodiyyah newspaper (issue no. 10132, Rabee’ al-Awwal 1421 AH) there is a quotation from the book Al-Ibl Asraar wa i’jaaz (The camel: secrets and wonders) by Darmaan ibn ‘Abd al-‘Azeez Aal Darmaan and Sanad ibn Mutlaq al-Subay’i:
Go to the above referenced web site if you want to read the rest or if you have any doubts about the accuracy. And remember, that one-time Muslim Democrat Barack Hussein Obama, who once said that "the evening call to prayers is the most beautiful sound he ever heard", says that we must all respect Islam. Respect it for what, I cannot understand.
The Jews are NOT promoting brainwashing children in military training camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non-Muslims.

The Jews don't hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the Olympics, or blow themselves up in German restaurants.

There is NOT one single Jew who has destroyed a church.

There is NOT a single Jew who protests by killing people. The Jews don't traffic slaves, nor have leaders calling for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.

Perhaps the world's Muslims should consider investing more in standard education and less in blaming the Jews for all their problems.

Muslims must ask 'what can they do for humankind' before they demand that humankind respects them.

Regardless of your feelings about the crisis between Israel and the Palestinians and Arab neighbors, even if you believe there is more culpability on Israel 's part, the following two sentences really say it all:

'If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel ."

Benjamin Netanyahu: General Eisenhower warned us. It is a matter of history that when the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Dwight Eisenhower, found the victims of the death camps he ordered all possible photographs to be taken, and for the German people from surrounding villages to be ushered through the camps and even made to bury the dead.

He did this because he said in words to this effect: 'Get it all on record now - get the films - get the witnesses - because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened'

Recently, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust from its school curriculum because it 'offends' the Muslim population which claims it never occurred.

It is not removed as yet. However, this is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving into it.

It is now more than 65 years after the Second World War in Europe ended.

Now, more than ever, with Iran, among others, claiming the Holocaust to be 'a myth,' it is imperative to make sure the world never forgets.

This e-mail is intended to reach 400 million people. Be a link in the memorial chain and help distribute this around the world.

How many years will it be before the attack on the World Trade Center 'NEVER HAPPENED' because it offends some Muslim in the United States?

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Will Hurricane Sandy become Obama's storm of opportunity?

As Hurricane Sandy inches its way closer to the Eastern seaboard the news from the media is flooding the airwaves about the dire consequences of its arrival. Upwards of 30-50 million people could be affected in Virginia, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and more. Besides the storm surges and flooding and monsoon rains there is now word that many of the affected will be without electrical power. One week before the most important presidential election in our lifetimes. Without electrical power the voting machines will not work. And neither will the vote counting tabulators. And the return of the electrical power could take weeks. It would only be natural disaster if the flooding disrupted commerce but to disenfranchise the right to vote for millions of people is a crisis that cannot be allowed to go to waste. And to use this storm as a massive coverup to the greatest vote stealing scam would be the crime of the century.

For months now there have been rumors that Barack Hussein Obama might look for something to use as an excuse to declare Martial Law and postpone the national elections if the polls showed that he was way behind. But during those months he was acting confident because he was enjoying a double digit lead. Lately, the surge of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in the polls has changed everything. The Occupy mob hasn't been heard from lately so there is no chance for any rioting in the streets and no reason to call out the National Guard or the Army. Obama did plan for such an event when he issued those Executive Orders allowing him to take over the essential elements that our society depends on. 

But what could he be thinking of right now with a monster storm only days away from Washington, D.C. about to shut off the largest Democrat voting stronghold in the nation? Could this be Obama's storm of opportunity?

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides and I pray to God that I am wrong.


Read the headlines about Obama's Incredible Shrinking Campaign

Click the images to watch the videos.

RNC Research - Biden Unhinged

Obama Failed To Give A Vision For The Future White House Already Backpedaling Obama At Times Was Not Presidential
Chuck Todd Fact Checks Obama’s Bayonets Line We Don’t Have Bayonets Governor Romney Was Right On Iraq
Obama Did Seek To Keep Troops In Iraq Richard Haass Fact Checks Obama On Iraq Romney Looked Like The Favorite Last Night
New RNC Web Ad: Big Bird, Binders & Bayonets David Gergen: Romney Passed The Commander In Chief Test Obama Diminished Himself As A Commander-In-Chief
Mark Halperin: Romney Moved Election Nothing New, Just In Glossy Booklet Romney Was Right And Obama Was Wrong On Auto Bailout
Romney Wins CBS Focus Group In Ohio Romney Won By Looking More Presidential Obama Looked Like A Challenger

Obama to America, "Nothing to see here, folks. Go back to sleep."

Well, one thing is for certain, there hasn't been anything to see here as far as Barack Hussein Obama goes. The same person who campaigned four years ago for a transparent government has become the most secretive, closed-doors administration in American history. Here is a 13-minute long video that proves this. If Obama had his way he'd be telling everyone that comes upon the scene of the accident that he caused, "Nothing to see here, folks. Go back to sleep."
Words MATTER.  A 13 Minute Video Every Voter Should Watch before election day.
WordsMatter2012 was launched this past March to offer non-partisan and objective insight into whether President Obama delivered on the many promises he made when running for office. The project was in fact inspired by a speech he gave in 2008 in which he said that "words matter." Through short weekly videos highlighting his promises, we merely ask, "Did his words matter? And do they matter today?"

By the way, have you ever wondered how this could happen without the complicit cooperation of our news media? Those people who write the stories we read about in our newspapers, and listen to on our television news reports. You know, some of these people actually went to journalism schools to learn how to write and report the news. The following is the Journalist's Creed that they were supposed to be taught.

Journalist's Creed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Journalist's Creed is a code of ethics written around 1906 by Walter Williams shortly after founding the Missouri School of Journalism.

The creed

I believe in the profession of Journalism.
I believe that the public journal is a public trust; that all connected with it are, to the full measure of responsibility, trustees for the public; that all acceptance of lesser service than the public service is a betrayal of this trust.
I believe that clear thinking, clear statement, accuracy and fairness are fundamental to good journalism.
I believe that a journalist should write only what he holds in his heart to be true.
I believe that suppression of the news, for any consideration other than the welfare of society, is indefensible.
I believe that no one should write as a journalist what he would not say as a gentleman; that bribery by one's own pocket book is as much to be avoided as bribery by the pocketbook of another; that individual responsibility may not be escaped by pleading another's instructions or another's dividends.
I believe that advertising, news and editorial columns should alike serve the best interests of readers; that a single standard of helpful truth and cleanness should prevail for all; that supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service.
I believe that the journalism which succeeds the best-and best deserves success-fears God and honors man; is stoutly independent; unmoved by pride of opinion or greed of power; constructive, tolerant but never careless, self-controlled, patient, always respectful of its readers but always unafraid, is quickly indignant at injustice; is unswayed by the appeal of the privilege or the clamor of the mob; seeks to give every man a chance, and as far as law, an honest wage and recognition of human brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance; is profoundly patriotic while sincerely promoting international good will and cementing world-comradeship, is a journalism of humanity, of and for today's world.
Yeah, I suppose, only in perfect world where people always told the truth.


Friday, October 26, 2012

Stupid is as stupid does: How the Libertarians and pseudo-conservative Ron Paul-bots are helping Barack Hussein Obama.

Somehow, some way, I started getting emails from those disgruntled Republicans who blindly follow Ron Paul. They have a web site called Liberty Crier and in spite of losing the primary elections they are still trying to convince people to write in a vote for Ron Paul for president. I am not against any third-party political movement, mainly because years ago when living in New York, I was a member of the New York State Conservative Party. That was during the time that ultra-liberals Nelson Rockefeller and Jacob Javits were running the Republican Party. Running it so badly you couldn't tell them apart from the Democrats. The Conservative Party won some clout when they began to cross-endorse certain conservative Republicans, allowing them to run on the Conservative line. There is a lesson to be learned here so I'll quote one paragraph of their history from Wikipedia:
The Conservative Party founders wanted to balance the Liberal Party's influence. One early supporter was National Review founder William F. Buckley, who was the party's candidate for mayor of New York City in 1965. In 1970, his brother James Buckley was elected to the U.S. Senate as a Conservative Party candidate; in 1976, he ran for reelection as a candidate of the Republican and Conservative Parties, losing to Daniel Patrick Moynihan. In the 2004 U.S. Senate election, the Conservative Party endorsed Marilyn O'Grady to oppose Republican candidate Howard Mills and incumbent Democratic Senator Charles Schumer. (and Chuck Schumer won!)
Read that last sentence again. While the Conservative Party was cross-endorsing conservative Republicans they had power in their combined strength. But when they ran a separate candidate against the Republicans, they and the Republicans both lost and the Democrats won. The error of their ways (myself included) began when they let their pride and egos overrule their common sense and they decided to break away from the main Republican Party. Had they organized their forces from within the Republican Party they could have moved it more to the right like the Tea Party did in 2010. But this strategy requires that you must accept the fact that you can't always have things your own way all the time.

On the national political scene there is no cross-endorsing between political parties. There is also the stark reality that in spite of a half-dozen or so minor parties such as the Socialist Party, Workers Party, Green Party, etc. the elections are decided between the two main parties: Democrats and Republicans. It is only when an election becomes very close that a third party candidate can take enough votes away from one side that helps the other side win. Ross Perot did this in 1992 when he won 19% of the popular vote and helped Democrat Bill Clinton beat Republican George H. W. Bush. The events that led up to Ross Perot running for president is somewhat similar to Ron Paul but the outcome is also appropriate to Gary Johnson, the current Libertarian candidate. Ross Perot was a Texas billionaire and he had a grudge against fellow Texan, George H. W. Bush. Perot used his wealth and started a national movement and got enough qualifying signatures to place his name on the ballot in all 50 states. George H. W. Bush, who was Ronald Reagan's vice-president did not enjoy the same conservative reputation among Republicans that Reagan did but managed to ride Reagan's coattails to get elected president in 1988. Because there were still a lot on conservative Republicans who enjoyed Ross Perot's rhetoric and disdained Bush's tepid brand of conservatism (recall that Bush resigned his Life Membership in the NRA because he objected to their referring to BATF agents as Jack-booted Thugs) Perot received enough votes to tip the outcome to a liberal Democrat.
The consequences of a Democratic victory on November 6th will be catastrophic.
Today, in 2012, America is facing a far more serious situation than those somewhat easy going days before September 11, 2001, and the consequences of anything happening to enable the Democrats to win this election are catastrophic. There is a lot more at stake than replacing a Democrat whose most deplorable act was receiving oral sex in the Oval Office and his subsequent impeachment for lying about it. Today, as a result of a corrupt anti-American leftist news media and an insidious conspiracy between communists and Islamic terrorists we have a genuine, would be dictator running for reelection. While many problems in American politics can be reversed in four year cycles, the next four years will create problems that will last for our lifetimes. We are losing our Constitutional Rights in the name of political correctness because of a pro-Muslim bias within our government financed by Saudi Arabia and The Muslim Brotherhood. We are on the verge of losing our national sovereignty because of Barack Hussein Obama's lifelong Marxist/socialist communist and yes, Muslim indoctrination favors United Nations control over our laws. If anyone still doubts the intentions or consequences of the United Nations on the future of America, here is a brief quote from an article posted on New Zeal.
“Alger Hiss Day” a Reminder of U.N.’s Anti-Americanism

By: Cliff Kincaid
Accuracy in Media

October 24 is United Nations Day, or as Barbara Marx Hubbard calls it, “Global Oneness Day.” It has also been labeled “Alger Hiss Day,” in recognition of the Soviet spy and State Department official who played a major role in founding the world body. Don’t expect the major media to remind us of that fact.
One of the best sources of information on the role of Alger Hiss in the U.N. is the important new book, Alger Hiss: Why He Chose Treason, by Christina Shelton.
The Shelton book notes, “Following Yalta, preparation for the establishment of the United Nations was Hiss’s primary mission.” Hiss was appointed acting secretary-general of the U.N. founding conference and was involved in staffing the U.N. by selecting people for employment in the world body. “About fifty showed up as permanent employees and a couple of hundred in part-time assignments,” Shelton says of Hiss’s efforts.
From the very beginnings of the organization of the U.N. at the direction of and influence of Alger Hiss, the post of Undersecretary-general for Political and Security Council Affairs was always to be handled by a communist. This was the post that oversaw the entire operations of U.S. troops fighting under the U.N. flag during the Korean War. The first war America did not win. Here is a rather lengthy excerpt of the background:
Secret agreement: U.N. military to always be commanded by a communist

One of the most important positions within the entire United Nations—if not the most important—is that of Undersecretary-general for Political and Security Council Affairs. Most Americans have never even heard of this position, much less anything about the man who holds the job. The undersecretary-general for political and security council affairs has three main areas of responsibility. They are:

  • Control of all military and police functions of the United Nations peacekeeping forces.
  • Supervision of all disarmament moves on the part of member nations
  • Control of all atomic energy ultimately entrusted to the United nations for peaceful and “other purposes”.
In view of the fact that these three functions may soon constitute the ultimate power of life and death over every human being on the face of the earth (once national disarmament is achieved and all military is under the control of the U.N.), there would appear to be some minor justification for us to be more than passingly curious over who wields this power. Since the United Nations was created in 1945 there have been fifteen men appointed to the position of undersecretary-general of political and security council affairs. Astonishingly, every single one of them has been a communist!
Communists appointed to the position of undersecretary-general
  • Arkady Sobolev--USSR (1946-1949)
  • Konstantin Zinchenko—USSR (1949-53)
  • Ilya Tehernychev—Ygoslavia (1954-1957)
  • Anatoly F. Dobrynin—USSR (1958-1960)
  • Georgi Ptrovich Arkadev—USSR (1960-1962)
  • Eugeny Dmiterievich Kiselev—USSR (1962-1963)
  • Vladimir Pavolovich Suslov—USSR (1963-1963)
  • Alexie E. Nesterenko—USSR (1965-1968)
  • Leonid N. Kutakov—USSR (1968-1973)
  • Arkady N. Shevchenko—USSR (1973-1978)
  • Mikhail D. Sytenko—USSR (1978-1981)
  • Viacheslav A. Ustinov—USSR (1981-1986)
  • Uasiliy S. Safronchuk—USSR (1987-1992)
  • Vladimir Petrovsky—Russia , “former USSR (1992-)
  • James O. C. Jonah—Sierra Leone (Co-chairman)
Some observers feel that fifteen Communists out of fifteen appointees constitutes a trend of sorts. But whatever we call it, Trygve Lie, the first secretary-general of the United Nations, revealed that this pattern was no mere coincidence. In his book In the cause of Peace Lie wrote: "Mr. Vyshinsky (of the USSR) did not delay his approach. He was the first to inform me of an understanding which the Big Five had reached in London on the appointment of a Soviet national as assistant secretary-general for political and security council affairs...
"Mr. Stettinius (U.S Secretary of State) confirmed to me that he had agreed with the Soviet delegation in the matter...
"The preservation of international peace and security was the organization's highest responsibility, and it was to entrusting the direction of the Secretariat department most concerned with this to a Soviet national that the Americans had agreed." (From The Fearful Master by Edward Griffin)
The most important subject that has been ignored in the campaign this year is that the next four years will see a change in the makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court, when at least one or two Justices retire. Should the next president overturn the present 5-4 conservative majority by handing out nominations for replacements to the leftists, our Bill of Rights will disappear, our economy will collapse and we will see America become a third-world power. And the new Supreme Court will likely decide on the legalities of any new treaties with the United Nations that our next president will agree to, so consider the above history very carefully.

It is unimaginable to think that any person would help elect a Democrat to make this happen yet that is exactly what anyone will do who does not vote for the Republicans. 

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.

Rabbis for Romney, posted on October 16, 2012 by Jerusalem Connection

Posted on October 16, 2012 by Jerusalem Connection

Rabbis for Romney
By Rabbi, Bernhard Rosenberg, ISRAPUNDIT —
This should serve as a wake up call for all Jews and Christians
who express love for America and Israel.
To My Fellow Rabbis:
I write to you at this time of dire trouble for our country and for Israel.
A couple of weeks ago, America was under attack. Our ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were slaughtered by Muslim extremists. This was not a spontaneous “protest” against an admittedly stupid video. This was an organized military assault, coordinated expressly for execution on September 11.
Likewise, the “protests” in Cairo at the American embassy where our flag was shredded and the black Islamist flag of al-Qaeda raised in its place. Reliable sources say the US was forewarned of both attacks — probably by Israel. But America’s State Department ignored those warnings. Why?
The Obama administration’s reactions to these outrages was sadly typical. The very next day, President Obama incongruously flew off to Las Vegas to raise funds. Lamentably, our government still apologizes for that inane video, made by an Egyptian Coptic.
Where is the leadership here? What has such ongoing appeasement gotten us? President Obama once promised a “reset” of America’s relationship with the Muslim world. But the reality has been far different. The Islamic world holds us in greater contempt than ever, seeing Obama’s America as weak, and as incapable, or unwilling, to defend our interests and our friends.
On that note, Obama’s policy towards Israel has been a disgrace from the start. It’s as if his goal is to disenfranchise himself – and America – from the Jewish state — to make clear to the world that Israel’s leaders, should they dare to defend the Jewish State’s very existence, will go it alone. Such signals serve only to embolden Israel’s enemies, who are also America’s enemies…our enemies!
The same signal comes from Obama’s latest snub of Bibi Netanyahu — who was told that Obama did not have time to meet with him when the Israeli Prime Minister arrived in America last month. Meanwhile, he found time to regale on CBS Television’s Late Show with David Letterman and also had time to chit chat with Barbara Walters and Whoopie Goldberg on the TV show, The View. To his discredit, Obama also extended an open invitation to Egypt’s President Morsi.
Such actions say a lot to the world. Can we stand silent any longer?
To the 613 “Rabbis for Obama”:
In light of the President’s actions toward Israel and her Prime Minister, I ask you to reconsider your public support for President Obama in next month’s election. Certainly, Israel deserves America’s full support and respect, not the treatment she has received under the current President.
I say this with all my heart: I cannot keep silent any longer. The voices of my father and my mother, survivors of Auschwitz and Buchenwald, compel me to speak out — with zeal.
I urge you to consider the following:
Silence did not work in the 1930s, when the looming evils of Nazism could have been stopped in their tracks. Nor will it work today, when Islamists – who deny the Holocaust – threaten the destruction of Israel and the murder of all the Jews and Christians therein.
Why does the United States say nothing about the daily denigration of Jews and Christians by imams, worldwide?
Why do we tolerate an American media that continues to play dumb when our real interests, and our very lives, are at stake?
Why does America continue to send money (and excuse outstanding loans) to Morsi’s Egypt?**
Why doesn’t America compel Morsi to uphold the peace treaty with Israel? To rein in Hamas? To act like a responsible, civil government?
Why don’t we rabbis come together and insist that the Obama Administration express — in words and In deeds – its unequivocal support for Israel during this most challenging of times?
And, of utmost importance, why doesn’t President Obama PUT INTO PRACTICE his until-now hollow words – “I have Israel’s back” – by immediately destroying Iran’s nuclear infrastructure?
I started “Rabbis for Romney” as a counterweight to “Rabbis for Obama.” My message at first was not political, but the situation has evolved — or devolved — into one in which the danger to Israel is more paramount than ever. Don’t kid yourselves. We are nearing the 11th hour.
Please join us in our quest to see that America and Israel stay safe from the growing danger that is all around us.
We can no longer afford to stay silent.
Let us make sure that, “Never again” means “NEVER again.”
Rabbi Bernhard Rosenberg
Note: To join “Rabbis for Romney,” please contact Rabbi Bernhard Rosenberg at
**Two weeks ago, the Obama Administration notified Congress that it would provide Egypt’s new government an emergency cash infusion of $450 million. Fortunately, Kay Granger (R-TX), the chairwoman of the House appropriations subcommittee which oversees the disbursement of foreign aid, stood up to President Obama and blocked the distribution to Egypt (MSNBC).
*About Rabbi Rosenberg:
Rabbi Dr. Bernhard H. Rosenberg is the spiritual leader of Congregation Beth-El, Edison, New Jersey.
He received his ordination and Doctorate of Education from Yeshiva University in New York. He also possesses A.A., B.A., M.A., and M.S. degrees in communication and education. The Jewish Theological Seminary presented him with his DD in May 2010.
Rabbi Rosenberg taught Holocaust and Genocide Studies graduate courses at Rutgers University and currently teaches communications and public speaking at Yeshiva University and Rutgers.
He recently received the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Humanitarian Award and was the recipient of the Chaplain of the Year Award from The New York Board of Rabbis for his efforts during and following 9-ll. On June 10, 2002, Rabbi Rosenberg was presented with the annual Rabbi Israel Mowshowitz Award by The New York Board of Rabbis. Rabbi Rosenberg appears frequently on radio and TV, and has published hundreds of articles regarding the Holocaust.
Rabbi Rosenberg is the author of:
Theological and Halachic Reflections on the Holocaust, 1992, second printing.
A Guide for the Jewish Mourner, 1992
Contemplating the Holocaust, 1999
What the Holocaust Means to Me: Teenagers Speak Out, 2002
Thoughts on the Holocaust-Where Was God Where Was Man–Teenagers Reflect on Major Themes of the Holocaust, 2004
The Holocaust as seen Through Film, 2005
Handbook for the Jewish Morner, 2009
Public Speaking – A Guide for Study–Third Edition, 2010
Public Speaking – A Guide for Study–Fourth Edition, 2011
Rosenberg Holocaust Siddur, 2011
Rosenberg Holocaust Hagaddah, 2011
The Holocaust in Film with Bibliography, 2011

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

When the end justifies the means you will always have situations like Benghazi.

(Wikipedia) Modus Operandi is a Latin phrase, approximately translated as "method of operation". The term is used to describe someone's habits or manner of working, their method of operating or functioning. In English, it is often shortened to M.O.

"The expression is often used in police work when discussing a crime and addressing the methods employed by the perpetrators. It is also used in criminal profiling, where it can help in finding clues to the offender's psychology. It largely consists of examining the actions used by the individual(s) to execute the crime, prevent its detection and/or facilitate escape."

That about sums up everything about Barack Hussein Obama that you need to know and what his Modus Operandi has been. Especially the criminal part. Obama's one-time Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel, added a twist to Barry's M.O. by telling him to, "Never let a crisis go to waste." Add this to the favorite thought of every Marxist that "The end justifies the means" and you have the makings for a very sinister group of conspirators willing and able to do anything, anywhere to get the results they want. Anything! 

So now we know that Hillary Clinton's State Department knew that the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya was a terrorist attack within two hours after it happened. Previously, we learned that Ambassador Stevens had asked for additional security for the embassy due to unrest in the area and his request was denied by the State Dept. And we know that instead of placing Americans on guard at the embassy, the State Dept. had contracted out the security to a local gang of Islamic dissidents. And those who are knowledgeable about the laws of Islam know that it is a high crime for any Muslim to kill another Muslim in order to protect a non-Muslim. So how were those Muslim security guards supposed to protect the American staff at the embassy if their religion forbid them from killing another Muslim? 

And of course, we know that in the days after the attack both Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton and the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations (along with the entire leftist horde of journalists in the news media) all were trying to blame the attack on the embassy as a result of a spontaneous demonstration of outraged Muslims who had been gravely insulted by an amateur video posted on YouTube which none of them probably even watched. And now we know that that attempt has failed.

So what was the reason behind the attack and what was the explanation for all of the failures to prevent it? If you consider the logic behind "The end justifies the means" often used by Marxists then maybe someone was trying to accomplish something. Or at least take a crisis and turn it to an advantage to accomplish an insidious deed.
When the initial attempt to blame the attack was being aimed at the anti-Islam video many liberals were chirping in that perhaps we should modify our Freedom of Speech rights so as to not be allowed to insult any religion. This is similar to what liberals do whenever a shooting takes place and people are killed. Think Fast & Furious. Calls are quickly made for more Gun Control. You've all heard the argument before about how many rights would you be willing to give up to gain a little more security.
The influence of the numerous Muslim organizations in America today is incredibly disproportionate to their population numbers. Yet we recently have learned that since Barack Hussein Obama, famous for saying "We must respect Islam", has occupied the White House, there has been a growing number of Muslims who have backgrounds connected to extremist organization, visiting the White House. As reported on Pamela Geller's Atlas Shrugs last Monday, Jihadists enjoy unfettered access to the White House  Steve Emerson and John Rossomando from IPT News released a report on October 21, 2012 that proved this.
A year-long investigation by the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) has found that scores of known radical Islamists made hundreds of visits to the Obama White House, meeting with top administration officials.
Court documents and other records have identified many of these visitors as belonging to groups serving as fronts for the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and other Islamic militant organizations.
The IPT made the discovery combing through millions of White House visitor log entries. IPT compared the visitors' names with lists of known radical Islamists.
One of the primary goals of Islamic extremists is to force or cajole Western governments into adopting Islamic Sharia Law and make all criticism against Islam to become a crime. This is based on Islam's Blasphemy Law which bans anything that insults Muslims. Any non-Muslim quoting a violent passage from the Qur'an or a text that describes some unpleasant act by the prophet Mohammad mentioned in one of the Hadiths or even writing about nearly 20,000 Islamic-inspired Jihad attacks since 9-11 and Muslims, who love to be called followers of The Religion of Peace, instantly explode into homicidal rage. (at least they do in countries where they comprise more than 10% of the population)  But there is something useful in modifying our Freedom of Speech rights that may appeal to anyone prone to totalitarian dictatorship. By blaming criticism as a form of hate speech you can also criminalize any act that tells the truth about what a wanna-be dictator does. You end up banning the opposition. Just as when guns are banned because of some extreme act of violence, which is another favorite rule enacted by every dictator. 

So lets call it for what it was, the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya was a complete set-up and it was allowed to happen because the powers that be wanted to use the crisis as an excuse to restrict our right to Free Speech. But they failed when the facts were uncovered.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.


Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Obama puts his foot in his mouth again when he talked about those horses in the military we no longer need…

About those horses in the military we no longer need… 

Barack Hussein Obama: “Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military’s changed.” (Well, maybe not so much) 

Horsetalk  Eleven years to the day after US Army Special Operations horse soldiers joined the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan to roust the Taliban from its strongholds, 200 war heroes have gathered at the World Trade Center memorial to rededicate a statue honouring the mounted troops.

Those war heroes include those who first parachuted into the Afghan mountains under the cover of snow and darkness to hit back against the Taliban.

They gathered on Friday at the World Trade Centre Memorial to rededicate the monumental bronze statue of the Horse Soldier. The statue is fittingly placed watching over the WTC Memorial. “Today, just as we gather to rededicate this statue, we pledge to rededicate ourselves to honor the bravest that our nation has to offer,” said Vince McGowan, president of the United War Veterans Council.

“As conflicts around the world wind down, this work of art will remind all visitors to the WTC Memorial of those who altered the course of history after September 11, 2001 – and, indeed, those who have served bravely in all wars.”

The 16-foot tall bronze statue is entitled De Oppresso Liber, or “to liberate the oppressed”, the motto of the United States Army Special Forces. It was cast in bronze by renowned sculptor Douwe Blumberg.

Due to long-planned construction and improvements at World Financial Center, the statue is being rededicated and moved to a temporary location. Constellations Group chief executie Bill White, who was master of ceremonies, said: “The Horse Soldier statue represents the best of our armed forces: bravery, strength, cunning and shared sacrifice.

“As we pause to reflect and rededicate, we welcome all visitors who come to the memorial to join us in paying tribute to these remarkable soldiers and all of those who fight for our nation.”

Oh, and by the way, the Marine Corps still use bayonets, too.
UPDATE: 8:00 PM Fox News has two interesting quotes on the subject of bayonets. While Obama is still trying to remove his foot from his mouth, here are his exact words, one more time.
"You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916,” Obama said. “Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military's changed."
“The bayonet is still very much a useful tool," former U.S. Marine Doug Miller, of Hiawatha, Kan., told "That was kind of a dumb thing for him to say."
"Bottom line: The bayonet remains part of the individual Marine equipment issue and Marines are trained to use it," retired Maj. Gen.  Ed Usher, president and CEO of the Marine Corps Association & Foundation, told

Heaven or Hell, author unknown.

                Heaven or Hell

While walking down the street one day a corrupt Senator (that may be redundant) was tragically hit by a car and died.
His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.
"Welcome to heaven," says St. Peter. "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we're not sure what to do with you."
"No problem, just let me in," says the Senator.

"Well, I'd like to, but I have orders from the higher ups. What we'll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity."

"Really? I've made up my mind. I want to be in heaven," says the Senator.

"I'm sorry" said St. Peter, "but we have our rules."

And with that, St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell.
The doors open and he finds himself in the middle of a green golf course.

In the distance is a clubhouse and standing in front of it are all his friends and other politicians who had worked with him.

Everyone is very happy and in evening dress. They run to greet him, shake his hand, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at the expense of the people.

They played a friendly game of golf and then dine on lobster, caviar and the finest champagne.

Also present is the devil, who really is a very friendly guy who is having a good time dancing and telling jokes.
They are all having such a good time that before the Senator realizes it, it is time to go.
Everyone gives him a hearty farewell and waves while the elevator rises.

The elevator goes up, up, up and the door reopens in heaven where St. Peter is waiting for him, "Now it's time to visit heaven."

So, 24 hours passed with the Senator joining a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing. They have a good time and before he realizes it, the 24 hours have gone by and St. Peter returns.

"Well, then, you've spent a day in hell and another in heaven. Now choose your eternity."

The Senator reflects for a minute, then he answers: "Well, I would never have said it before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I would be better off in hell."

 "So be it", said St. Peter and escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell...

Now the doors of the elevator open and he's in the middle of a barren land covered with waste and garbage. He sees all his friends, dressed in rags, picking up the trash and putting it in black bags as more trash falls to the ground.

The devil comes over to him and puts his arm around his shoulders.

 "I don't understand," stammers the Senator. "Yesterday I was here and there was a golf course and clubhouse, and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a great time. Now there's just a wasteland full of garbage and my friends look miserable. What happened?"

The devil smiles at him and says,

"Yesterday we were campaigning,

Today, you voted."

Vote wisely on November 6, 2012

Monday, October 22, 2012

Barack Hussein Obama trips over his own web of lies.

I love that expression about lies and deceit coined by Sir Walter Scott two hundred years ago: "Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive!" Too bad Barack Hussein Obama didn't learn it when he was in college. If he had then maybe he wouldn't be getting confused over the facts about his own life story. Now I am reminded that a few short years ago we read that Obama had claimed he was born in two different hospitals in Hawaii and he had listed two different birth dates on his web site. So this web of lies has been tripping him up for quite some time. Today someone just pointed out that Barack Hussein Obama has just changed the story again about his dear mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. Here's how the web site Proof Positive explains it.
Within a one week period, Barack Obama went from being "born to a single mom" to being taught to love jazz by a father who apparently was never around …
An email sent from the Obama campaign (asking for donations, of course) offered a "Dinner with Barack," with airfare "on us." It also mentions how Barack Obama's father taught him to love jazz.
But there is a problem with that emotional ask…
BECAUSE according to Obama's official life story, Barack Obama Jr. claims he was with Barack Obama Sr. briefly in the early 1970s and then again for a week or 10 days when he was 9-YEARS-OLD.
That's it.

"How was that enough time to teach 9-year-old Obama to love jazz music? Besides, jazz is uniquely American. Besides, what evidence is there the Kenyan dug Coltrane?" says Joel Gilbert, whose documentary "Dreams from My Real Father" was recently released.
Then, an email from Julianna Smoot, deputy campaign manager of Obama for America pushed the dinner for your dollars fundraiser, spelling out just what the winner will learn about the president:
"You can learn a lot: His dad taught him to love jazz, his girls get crazy-embarrassed when he dances or sings in public, his dream job is starting point guard for the Chicago Bulls – and he really looks forward to sharing these meals with supporters like you."
In the fight for the truth – digging for facts in piles of fiction and fraud and one dead end after another – we've mulled over the issue of whether or not Obama Senior married Barack Obama's mother as a marriage of convenience.
After all, it would have helped her out of a jam while at the same time Obama senior could have gained a substantial benefit of a spousal renewal for his visa.
As you may or may not recall, Barack Obama famously introduced himself at the Democratic National Convention in 2004 as the result of an "improbable love" between a girl from Kansas and a Kenyan goat herder.
At other times Obama has insisted that if only Harvard had offered his father (Obama Senior) enough money to support the family, his father never would have had to leave a wife and a 2-year-old Obama behind to pursue his dreams.

Now, Obama is claiming that his parents were not married at the time of his birth ONE WEEK BEFORE the dinner invite to learn about the president's love of jazz that he learned from his father.
He even tweeted it (above).
So, how do all the different stories – born to a single mom and taught to love jazz by an African father with no record for a love of American jazz and who wasn't around – make sense?
Because it's all likely part of the gigantic fraud and grand cover-up conspiracy that the White House has been pulling on the American people from the get-go.
This version matches evidence that WND has been compiling for years that Ann Dunham never lived with Obama Senior and that, if there ever was a recorded marriage, it was a marriage of convenience for both:
  • Ann Dunham never shared so much as a common address with Barack Obama Sr., either before or after the baby was born.
  • Immigration and Naturalization documents indicated their concerns that Obama Sr. and Dunham were ever married.
  • OFFICIAL RECORDS showing the INS was prepared to prevent any attempt by Obama Sr. to extend his visa on the basis of his claim of being married to Dunham and being the father of a U.S. citizen.
  • No marriage certificate has ever been located for Obama Sr. and Dunham. (Of course, no records documenting Dunham's whereabouts for the six months between her alleged marriage in February 1961 and the baby's in August have ever been located either.)
  • Dunham left Hawaii just weeks after Obama Jr. was born to enroll in University of Washington in Seattle, taking classes on campus beginning in late September 1961. Obama Sr. remained at the University of Hawaii.
But if Barack Obama Sr. did not teach Jr. to love jazz and is not Junior's real father, then who did? Who is Barack Hussein Obama talking about?
What does this mean for the American people? What is the truth that all these lies are concealing?

As reported by WND, Gilbert's first reaction was to assume the Obama campaign was conceding that Frank Marshall Davis – the Communist Part USA propagandist and Marxist who is widely recognized as a lover and published commentator of JAZZ – was his true biological FATHER!
Frank Marshall Davis was coincidentally born in Kansas like Obama's mother and MARRIED to another woman, lending even more credibility that the Obama-Dunham marriage – if it even legally existed – was a sham, a cover-up to protect those involved.
"It appears the Obama campaign is finally admitting I'm right, that Frank Marshall Davis, the Communist Party USA propagandist and Marxist, was his real father. So there you have it, Obama is a red diaper baby," said Gilbert.
How do we know Davis loved jazz?
Because communist Frank Marshall Davis was friends with jazz musicians in Chicago, worked as a DJ on a jazz radio station, had a large collection of jazz records AND wrote a regular column in the communist-run Honolulu Record newspaper that was often about jazz, as this typical newsclipping illustrates .
That's not to mention there are nude photos of Obama's mother taken at what Gilbert determined was Davis' house with a record player and jazz records clearly visible.
There is also this family photo (see right) showing a young Obama about 12 years-old along with his mother, grandfather and half-sister that was discovered on Obama's Facebook page.
Upon closer look at the unenhanced photo, there are several anomalies –
"All suspected alterations to the photo seem to point to the cutting, pasting and airbrushing of Barack Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, into the photo to cover up someone of African-American origin," wrote Robert Nikolakakis, an expert professional graphic artist and illustrator with 21 years-experience.
Here are just a few of the problems:
  • The black hand under Obama's right armpit doesn't match Ann Dunham's right arm. The size, color and position is wrong.
  • The chair on the far left next to Dunham doesn't match the others.
  • Dunham's hair shows signs of airbrushing.
  • The lighting on Ann Dunham's face is from the far left whereas Obama Jr. and grand-dad are lit from above.
  • A ghosting effect appears under Obama's arm where a glow emanates suggesting a different underlying image such as a light-colored shirt behind Obama. There is also uneven pixilation, a sign of cloning.
In Obama's book "Dreams of My Father," Obama refers to "Frank" throughout the book without identifying him by his full name although many who knew and researched the Obama family allege Obama Jr. had developed a father-son relationship with the Davis and got career advice.
Curiously, all mentions of "Frank" were scrubbed from the audio version of Obama's book.
Perhaps Obama knew it would be smarter to hold this father-like figure at arm's length considering several anti-communist congressional committees accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations – something most voters don't take lightly.
Some critics of Obama are even grappling with the disturbing idea that Davis recruited Obama –
So, is this all part of the grand birth certificate cover-up of Obama's biological and ideological roots or is it nothing?
We don't know and, America, we won't know unless Congress takes ACTION!