From 2008 to 2011, I was a guest lecturer
at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (the primary DHS
training facility, located in coastal Georgia) and at Joint Special
Operations University (which brings foreign officers to learn of U.S.
irregular warfare, located in Tampa). At both venues I was asked to
lecture on the history of terrorism.
I did so in an even-handed and
comprehensive manner, exploring the issue across place (Europe to East
Asia), time (ancient Assyria to al-Qaeda), and ideology (religious:
pagan, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, and Muslim; and political: right-wing,
left-wing, anarchist, environmentalist, etc.). Only 14 of the 44
PowerPoint screens in my presentation dealt with Islamic terrorism,
although several of those actually mitigated against the concept.
JSOU continued to utilize me until late
2011, when I was told by the course instructor that Muslim student
officers had complained that “I talked too much about Islamic
terrorism.”
It is difficult to express just how willfully ignorant of reality these statements and accompanying policies are.
And that is the primary point: Islam is a belief system. Not a race.
Muslims can be of any skin, Bosnian or
Turkish, Nigerian, Saudi, Chinese. If American, Muslims can perhaps be
of several nationalities. This is equally if not more true of
Christians, who can be white Finns, black Ethiopians, brown Lebanese, or
Koreans, to name but a few examples. It is not possible to look at
someone (sans distinctive clothing) and ascertain whether he or she is Muslim or Christian — or secularist, for that matter.
Advocacy groups and willing dupes in the
media and Democrat Party — like Senator Dick Durbin — have foolishly yet
successfully conflated race and ideology in the case of only one religion,
Islam. They have made examining the latter tantamount to discrimination
against the former. No one ever argues that singling out Christians
for repression because they hold politically incorrect views about gay
marriage or abortion amounts to “racism.”
Beyond the obvious fact that beliefs do not constitute a race, Holder et al. are massively wrong to deny the clear link between certain Islamic beliefs and terrorism.
Currently there are 57 groups on the U.S. State Department Foreign Terrorist Organization list;
38 of these are stridently Islamic in ideology and goals. Ten of these
are secular/Leftist, six are nationalist, one is anarchist, and one each
is Jewish and Christian. (The latter one — the Japanese, sarin
gas-using Aum Shinrikyo — is at best only nominally Christian, and
better described as generically apocalyptic.)
So: 67% of the world’s terrorist groups
as recognized by the U.S. (more, actually, if State were honest and
comprehensive; they should includee Syria’s Jabhat al-Nusra, the Islamic
State of Iraq & Syria, etc.) are Muslim.
Since 9/11, 82% of U.S. Department of
Justice terrorism convictions have been of Muslims, despite the fact
that Muslims comprise less than 1% of the American population. (I
accessed this data some time ago; it has since mysteriously disappeared from the DOJ website.)
The University of Maryland’s Global Terrorism Database
tracks terrorism incidents from 1970 to today: search for “Islam” and
you find almost 5,000 entries. Search for “Christianity” and you will
find a grand total of 14.
The NSA could probably save a lot of money — as well as abide by the Constitution — if it simply acknowledged the following:
A person with neither a first nor a last
Muslim name stood only a 1 in 500,000 chance of being a suspected
terrorist. The likelihood for a person with a first or a last Muslim name was 1 in 30,000. For a person with first and last Muslim names, however, the likelihood jumped to 1 in 2,000 (Levitt & Dubner, Super Freakonomics, 2009, p. 93).
Clearly, for those with eyes to see and
ears to hear, Islam is the world’s major ideological motivator of
terrorism and violence. (I have neither the time, nor the patience, to
yet again demonstrate the legitimate Islamic roots of violence. Ray Ibrahim’s brilliant article
should be all the proof needed for those able to handle the truth.) Yet
Eric Holder and his boss would have the federal authorities most
responsible for protecting the public — led by the FBI — pretend that up
is down, freedom is slavery, and Islam is peaceful except when
“twisted” by a “handful of extremists.”
Instead of ardent Islamic beliefs being treated as a clear marker for potential terrorism, they are now a talisman protecting the holder not just from scrutiny, but suspicion.
Obama and Holder are transforming the U.S. into a dhimmi
nation: one that cowers before Islamic law and demands that its
non-Muslim citizens — especially its 240 million Christians — meekly
accept their second-class status and never broach the glaringly obvious
fact of Islamic violence, even if this means making all non-Muslims less
safe. The question for those of us in the majority, then: just how long
will we put up with such a dangerous policy?