Saturday, December 10, 2011

The Democrats Hate Crime Bill two years later: From cross-dressing men allowed in women's fitting rooms at Macy's, to outlawing criticism of Islam.

Never mind that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it was OK for the Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas to picket military funerals with signs that said "Thank God for dead soldiers" because they had their right to free speech "no matter how hateful". Now we are facing the fallout from the Democrats Hate Crimes Act commonly referred to as the Pedophile Protection Act, H.R. 1913 and the Senate version S. 909 they passed in 2009.
Now, no one is allowed to discriminate against anyone who conforms to any of the perversions, specifically the 547 paraphilias listed by the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders as I wrote in my blog on Thursday, August 25, 2011,
Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL), when confronted with a list of 547 paraphilias from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, including pedophilia, he declared that “all of these philias and fetishes and isms that were put forward – need not live in fear because of who they are.”
A recent story hit the news about a Macy's store clerk who was fired from her job because she refused to let a man dressed as a woman from entering the women's fitting room. Seems that Macy's has adopted a policy that permits a zero tolerance against discriminating against any form of perversion directed at the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender (LGBT) community.
Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel

“Excuse, me, but men cannot use the women’s fitting room. The women’s fitting room is for women only.” That’s what Natalie Johnson politely told a young man wearing lipstick who entered the women’s fitting room and undressed. And for that, Macy’s fired her because the store’s absurd policy actually allows men to use the women’s fitting room. Liberty Counsel is now helping Natalie get her job back, and even more importantly, we’re asking Macy’s to change this ridiculous policy that places women at risk. Please read my important update on this fast-developing story below – Mat.

Natalie Johnson’s story is generating international news coverage and drawing widespread attention to Macy’s dangerous “Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender (LGBT) policy.”

When Natalie politely told the cross-dressing young man he could not use the women’s fitting room, he and the attorney with him said that Macy’s is “LGBT friendly” and began shouting expletives. Then they demanded to see Natalie’s supervisor.

Natalie’s stand and subsequent dismissal have become international news. Most media outlets are characterizing it as yet another example of the escalating aggressiveness of radical LGBT activists who deceitfully call their disruptive actions a “civil rights” struggle.
Now another story on a slightly different subject has been reported on Jihad Watch about an upcoming meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the United Nations representative from the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to discuss outlawing criticism of Islam. Now that the Democrats got their collective foot in the door on Hate Crimes, we can possibly look forward to almost anything fitting that category. Gee, maybe if Obama gets reelected it will be against the law to criticize the Democratic Party. I think he may be looking forward to this since he has already got the concentration camps built for all those enemies of America.
It couldn't happen here, right? We have the First Amendment, right? Well, look at how the Second Amendment has been interpreted almost out of existence in some areas. The same thing could happen to the First -- and the process is already underway. "Criticism of Islam Could Soon be a Crime in America," by Clare M. Lopez for Family Security Matters, December 8 (thanks to all who sent this in):
Six years later, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is due to host OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu in Washington, DC in mid-December 2011 to discuss how the United States can implement the OIC agenda to criminalize criticism of Islam. Cloaked in the sanctimonious language of Resolution 16/18, that was adopted by the UN Human Rights Council in April 2011, the WDC three-day experts meeting is billed as a working session to discuss legal mechanisms to combat religious discrimination (but the only religion the Human Rights Council has ever mentioned in any previous resolution is Islam). The UN Human Rights Council, which includes such bastions of human rights as China, Cuba, Libya, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, introduced Resolution 16/18 to the UN General Assembly (UNGA), where it was passed in March 2011.
The Resolution was presented to the UNGA by Pakistan (where women get the death penalty for being raped and "blasphemy" against Islam is punished by death). Ostensibly about "combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and…incitement to violence against persons based on religion or belief," the only partnership mentioned in the text is the one with the OIC. The U.S., whose official envoy to the OIC, Rashad Hussain, helped write Obama's Cairo speech, actively collaborated in the drafting of Resolution 16/18.
Read the rest here:
Guess it is OK to exercise Free Speech against dead American soldiers but it may not be OK to criticize the radical religion that has killed them and thousands of other innocent Americans. We can thank the Democrats for all of this. And lets not forget that politically correct "zero tolerance" policy that is putting 6-year old school children in handcuffs for throwing spitballs.


No comments:

Post a Comment

No foreign language comments allowed. English only. If you cannot access the comments window send me an email at