Saturday, August 17, 2013

Some say Oprah helping 'The Butler' attendance. No one asked how much Jane Fonda's role kept people away.


Preliminary box-office results reported by Deadline.com say Oprah Winfrey's role in the movie 'The Butler'  was a drawing point for Friday night attendance. But the movie still doesn't look like the blockbuster is was promoted to be.
Also interesting to note is that 72% of Fandango’s The Butler ticket-buyers who were surveyed claimed that co-star Oprah Winfrey’s involvement increased their interest in seeing the film. Love her or hate her, Oprah in her first movie role in 15 years is helping The Butler‘s box office right now.
Much to the disgust of conservative Republicans, when word came out that 'Hanoi' Jane Fonda was given the role of Nancy Reagan, it appeared a backlash may develop in protest. Whether the protest is successful or not will be seen in coming days or weeks but one thing is sure and that is no one polled anyone on what negative affect 'Hanoi' Jane's role would have.
Now, in a story published on The US Report, in a story about the casting of 'Hanoi' Jane the director acknowledges his political activism and admitted the insult was intentional.

As boycott proceeds, 'The Butler' director acknowledges political activism

Lee Daniels, director and producer of the film The Butler did a Q&A with Politico’s Patrick Gavin.

The film has already become a target for Vietnam-era veterans and their supporters because Jane Fonda was cast as First Lady Nancy Reagan.
Fonda’s activism against the Vietnam War and her vitriolic attacks on U.S. troops as well as her praise for repressive government systems made her quite possibly the worst choice in the universe to play President Ronald Reagan’s wife.

Was Fonda deliberately cast in the role as an insult?
If an actress stands for most of what Reagan was against, Fonda is the poster femme.

Daniels acknowledged there was a political slant, not only in the choice of actors, but in the spirit of the film.
The group Boycott Hanoi Jane Playing Nancy Reagan has grown to more than 26,000 supporters on Facebook. Many supporters of the boycott remember Fonda’s behavior at a time similar to today, when there was bitter division among the people and weak leadership in Washington.

The US Report urges all conservatives, Republicans and others who admire the Reagan legacy and who respect the U.S. military to boycott the film and click ‘Like’ on the Facebook page.
America’s enemy confirmed years after the war that Fonda and other celebrities were a valuable asset in their fight against the U.S. on behalf of communism.
Read more here:  http://www.theusreport.com/the-us-report/2013/8/14/as-boycott-proceeds-the-butler-director-acknowledges-politic.html
  

Monday, August 12, 2013

Disarming America: Obama Will Sign UN Gun Treaty While Congress Is On Vacation


Obama Will Sign UN Gun Treaty While Congress Is On Vacation

You heard it straight from the horse's mouth. Jay Carney said Obama will sign the UN Arms Trade Treaty "before the end of August...We believe it's in the interest of the United States." This is very strategic timing considering Congress is on a 5 week vacation lasting thru the month of August!
These back door tactics are nothing new for the Obama Administration, which is why we are using tactics of our own to stop his anti-gun agenda. We have the home fax numbers of every Senator so while they are absent from the Capitol we can demand they must not ratify the UN Gun Treaty once Obama signs it.
We CAN stop this international treaty from reaching American soil by killing it the United States Senate. The U.S Senate must ratify an international treaty for it to be effective. They would need 67 votes to ratify the treaty. Reach every U.S.. Senator at their home office; tell them you do not want this treaty in OUR United States!

Everything Obama tackles in office is strategically timed and politically motivated. He only looks out for himself, his fellow liberals, and his anti-gun agenda. After mass shootings the Administration would launch all-out attacks on our gun rights since the country would be more susceptible to change after a traumatic event. He made sure the Benghazi cover up was swept under the rug until he got re-elected. He will wait to attack certain issues until the 2014 Congressional elections so he'll know how many liberals are by his side.
Obama believes now is the best time to sign the UN Gun Treaty since Congress is out of Washington. He will have less scrutiny to worry about if Congress is not nearby. He also thinks the public eye is not paying attention too closely. It is the slow summer months, people are on vacation, Congress is out of Washington so nothing must be happening.
Obama may think he is being sneaky but we will make sure the public knows what he is up to and so will all 100 U.S. Senators. By sending faxes to each Senator's home office, they will realize how important this issue is to the American people. If we are reaching out to them while they are on vacation they will know they must take action. We must flood the home offices with faxes from Patriots across the country demanding our U.S. Senate does not ratify this international gun grab!
Gun advocates are weary of the language in the treaty including the fact that 'small arms and light weapons' are among the included weaponry that could be regulated by the United Nations. The UN Gun Treaty is a lot like ObamaCare; we will not know what it fully entails until it is implemented. It is impossible to trust the UN's reassurance that this treaty will not affect our current gun laws or our Second Amendment. After all, the UN Arms Trade Treaty had previously been rumored as a replacement of the Second Amendment.
The Obama Administration seems to be thrilled with the thought of global gun control. John Kerry cannot wait for it to be signed:
"As your review of the treaty continues, we strongly encourage your administration to recognize its textual, inherent and procedural flaws, to uphold our country's constitutional protections of civilian firearms ownership, and to defend the sovereignty of the United States, and thus to decide not to sign this treaty."
We must make it clear TODAY to the Senate and the White House that the Second Amendment must be protected and that they must reject any and all U.N. Gun Control. Tell them to KEEP THEIR TREATY AWAY FROM OUR GUNS!
All of the evidence suggested Trayvon threw the first punch, Trayvon was on top, Trayvon was unloading significant damage onto Zimmerman, and Zimmerman used deadly force to defend himself. No matter what the facts are, the anti-gunners continue to push their agenda to try to get what they want.
It is our job as Americans and Second Amendment Patriots to meet the anti-gun crowd head on. We will fight any legislation that tries to destroy our self-defense laws or our Second Amendment rights. We need your help in order to launch a significant attack against the anti-gun agenda. They use smoke, mirrors, and lies to push their agenda while we show the facts. So many resources are needed in order to be successful against the anti-gun crowd. Anything you can give us will be substantial in maintaining our goal of protecting America's Second Amendment!
The uncertainty begins in the discussion of small arms. Where will the regulations on our small arms start, and where will they stop? They are even trying to include ammunition regulations in the Arms Trade Treaty! Will the United Nations try to impose international licensing requirements, an international registry, or international?
The last negotiations for an Arms Trade Treaty took place in July 2012, just four months before the Presidential election. Obama did not want to take a big stance for global gun control just months before his re-election but now he has made it clear he is for total gun control. He also told voters he would not be re-visiting negotiations for an Arms Trade treaty but here we are.

Since his re-election it has become clearer than ever what is at the top of his agenda; taking our guns away! The Obama Administration has been exploiting tragedies since the election to push gun control at the city, state, federal, and now GLOBAL level.
Our Senate took a stance before the Presidential election when 51 of them wrote Obama a letter saying they would not support an Arms Trade Treaty. We must let our entire U.S. Senate know we do not support international gun control. They must not ratify this international treaty.

Sincerely Yours,

Alan M. Gottlieb
Chairman
Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

If you prefer to donate by check, please mail to:
Citizens Committee for the Right
to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA)

Dept Code
Liberty Park
12500 NE 10th Place
Bellevue, WA 98005

With more than 650,000 members and supporters nationwide, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is one of the nation's premier gun rights organizations. As a non-profit organization, the Citizens Committee is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States. Contributions are not tax deductible. The Citizens Committee can be reached by phone at (425) 454-4911 or by email to Patriot@CCRKBAUpdate.org
Copyright © 2013 Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, All Rights Reserved.

 

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Government orders 90% of population reduced to save Mother Earth and it soon won't be a joke to laugh at.


The crackpots finally took over the insane asylum. Unfortunately for us, they were not planning on making a horror movie, they were taking over the government. Every government in the entire world! Our World. AGENDA 21 is real.

The Human Race has been declared a hostile species and a threat to the planet: the environmentalists have said so. Obama’s buddy Cass Sunstein, argues strongly for human euthanasia. “…what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. …"  Dave Foreman, Co-Founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.” Roger Martin, environmental activist, “Fewer people mean better lives.” Obamacare death panels. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner said, “We need death panels…until we start allocating health care resources more prudently—rationing, by its proper name..." And now the United Nations has listened to the crackpots and has created Agenda 21.
Additional reference material can be found here:  National Center for the Development of Constitutional Strategies (NCDCS) Problem solving through Constitutionalism  http://ncdcs.wordpress.com/undoing-america/understanding-agenda-21/
A must download to share with neighbors, elected officials and freedom minded governments staffers:  Understanding Sustainable Development – Agenda 21 – For the People and their Public Officials


DailySanity Newsletter from Conservative-Daily.com


Share this on Facebook  Share this on Twitter

Click to display full size.

Dear Patriotic Ladies & Gentlemen,

We regret to inform you that you have been targeted for extinction. The United Nations has decided that you and your offspring are a threat to Mother Earth, and you must be terminated.

Those of you who are mercifully still allowed to live will have to relocate to a designated zone, and you will only be allowed to travel within the corridors outlined by the United Nations, as depicted on the above map.

This is for the good of the Earth, and you must put aside all individual choice and thought and go along with what the experts have deemed necessary in order to save our planet.

Agenda 21’s manual proclaims that:

Global warming, the depletion of fuel, water, food, and the like, is the direct cause of human intervention. The real enemy is humanity itself. The damage people cause the planet is a function of demographics equal to the degree of development. The ecological crisis was really the population crisis. Cut the population by ninety-plus percent and you stop injuring the earth by an equal amount.”
 
 
You may recall Conservative Daily has run a series of articles on Agenda 21 and its indoctrination program known as Common Core, but never have we connected all the dots so definitively for you. The more we research this, the more frightened we become.

The premise is this: “Sustainability” proponents believe that the Earth is under an imminent threat from humans, and therefore humanity must be controlled, limited and ultimately eliminated. The United States of America and other Westernized nations are considered especially dangerous, because our technology, our lifestyles and our free choice consume resources that radical environmentalists believe should only be used by animals and nature.

Agenda 21 lists the following as NOT sustainable: Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.
 
In their own words, these radical “new thinkers” tell you everything you need to know about their agenda. Pay close attention:

Dave Foreman, Co-Founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”

Roger Martin, environmental activist, “Fewer people mean better lives.” 

Professor Philip Cafaro of Colorado State University, “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change.”

Thomas Ferguson, former State Department official: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”

But how can they assure that humans are wiped out?

Hello, Obamacare death panels. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner said, “We need death panels…until we start allocating health care resources more prudently—rationing, by its proper name—the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”

Barack Obama’s science advisor John Holdren advocates a “program of sterilizing women after their second or third child.” And this could be accomplished, he proposes, by “the development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired…The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

Is it adding up for you yet? Are you beginning to see how the dots are connected?

Rahm Emanuel’s brother Dr. Ezekial Emanuel received 2009 stimulus funds for his research council. Emanuel is a huge proponent of rationing care for the elderly and disabled. Obama advisor Cass Sunstein is known for his advocacy of human euthanasia and argues that human life varies in value. Science czar John Holdren states in his book Ecoscience, “To provide a high quality of life for all, there must be fewer people.”

These are the people the President of the United States surrounds himself with, because he agrees with their views and admires their philosophies.


Think of how fondly the Democrats praise Planned Parenthood, how Obama thanks them for doing great work. The world is prepared to KILL OUR CHILDREN if it means the poor, fragile Mother Earth would live to see another minute.

Listen to what a couple of medical ethicists from Oxford University have to say about killing off our population (the word ethics being associated with any of these views is simply appalling): “…what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child.  Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be.”


The problem with all this anxiety over population control is that it’s not necessary: the population is not exploding at alarming levels; birth rates are on the decline. But as Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace says, “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.” 

Slate.com ran an article in January of this year reporting, “according to experts’ best estimates, the total population of Earth will stop growing within the lifespan of people alive today. And then it will fall. This is a counterintuitive notion in the United States, where we’ve heard often and loudly that world population growth is a perilous and perhaps unavoidable threat to our future as a species.”

The article goes on to note that “population decline is a very familiar concept in the rest of the developed world, where fertility has long since fallen far below the 2.1 live births per woman required to maintain population equilibrium.”

Germany, Spain, Western Europe, Russia, and China…all the numbers suggest a declining population, in some places by as much as HALF.

But, this information is inconvenient. Sustainability is the back door through which socialism will take over. And who will administer all this humanitarian justice? The enlightened elitists, of course. James Lovelock told the UK’s Guardian, “Democracy must be put on hold” in order to fight global warming and only “a few people with authority” should rule the Earth until we get this crisis under control.”

Professor Maurice King believes that, “Global sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”

You mean nothing to these elitists, who believe that “human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs” – that is from John Davis, of the Earth First Journal.


On August 13th Obama is scheduled to give a speech asking for MORE TAXPAYER MONEY to combat climate control.

In essence, he is asking you to sign your own death warrant.

And in case you don’t see the full picture Obama and the globalists are trying to paint for you, you soon will. Obama is hiring a "Behavioral Insights Team" that will look for ways to subtly influence your behavior. This “nudge” program is based on a similar project implemented in England, where people were encouraged to sign up for retirement benefits, or insulate their homes better. It is based on a 2008 book by Obama’s buddy Cass Sunstein, who we told you above argues strongly for human euthanasia.

As a proud American citizen, you should be very frightened right now to see the big picture of what is happening. The environmentalists have taken over the nation’s discourse and are infiltrating our schools as we speak with the educational program known as Common Core. We are all going to be conditioned to believe as Reed Noss of the Wildlands Project that, “The native ecosystems and the collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans.”

Once the humans are contained, confined, and many of them starved off or aborted, the birds and bees and trees can live harmoniously and all will be right with the planet.

Conservative Daily will continue to get the message out about these insidious programs and we will fight tooth and nail against Agenda 21.

    
Sincerely,
Tony Adkins
Conservative Daily

Tell Your Friends!
Make sure your friends read this too...we need every voice we can get to change the status quo in Washington! Forward this to a friend »

Conservative Daily is a media outlet protected by the first amendment and support for our efforts is not tax-deductible. Not interested in receiving emails like this? Unsubscribe instantly. This email was sent to abbyd@fuse.net.

Shuffling Madness Media, 10750 Pine Drive, Parker, CO 80134
Copyright 2013 Shuffling Madness Media. All rights reserved.
 

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Why don't the politicians first decide if the public has a right to self defense?

 
The courts seem to be in a quandary over citizens rights to carry a concealed weapon for self defense. This recent headline says it all: U.S. Court Of Appeals For Third Circuit: “Unsettled Whether 2nd Amendment Applies Outside The Home”. What seems to be the stumbling block is a rather mindless opinion that suggests that an assailant has the right to determine the rules of combat. In other words, if the assailant is bigger or stronger or younger and carries a non-gun weapon, i.e. a club, a knife, etc., and attacks someone who is smaller and weaker or older, how may the victim be allowed to defend themselves? It's called equalization but the learned liberal judges can't seem to figure it out. The woman who carries a concealed handgun is able to defend herself against a more powerful attacker, whom she would otherwise be unable to fight off or run away from. But running away seems to be the only suggestion the liberal anti-gun crowd has to offer. Case in point, as Katie Pavlich reported on Townhall.com.

Director of Bloomberg's Anti-Gun Group: You Should Fight a Guy Wielding an Axe With Your Fists, Not a Gun

Katie Pavlich | Aug 05, 2013
Just three weeks after naming Boston bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev as a "gun violence" victim, Michael Bloomberg's Mayors Against Illegal Guns [MAIG] is embarrassing itself again.
On Sunday (8/4/13), during an appearance on MSNBC’s Hardball, MAIG Director Mark Glaze suggested fighting back against someone wielding an axe with an intent on serious doing harm….with your fists. His larger argument was that unless an attacker has a gun, a victim doesn’t have right to shoot that attacker with a gun of their own in self-defense. Here is the transcript:
MARK GLAZE: Very often somebody will come at you. They might want to have a fistfight. They might come at you with an axe handle.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Would you consider the guy with the axe handle armed or not?

MARK GLAZE: Not with a gun.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: I would consider him armed [laughter].

MARK GLAZE: I have a word for him. I grew up in Colorado where my dad was a gun dealer, and a guy who shoots somebody who has anything other than a gun when they could have done something else like talk or fight with their fists –

CHRIS MATTHEWS: How do you talk to a guy with an axe handle?

MARK GLAZE: Well, you fight him. You run away. You deescalate the situation.
A more practical example is the case of George Zimmerman who was attacked by Trayvon Martin. Martin, who was younger and stronger and knowledgeable of Mixed Martial Arts fighting,  blindsided Zimmerman and knocked him to the ground and got on top of him. Zimmerman was older and heavier an not in good physical condition, was unable to flee, but he did have a concealed handgun. After getting his head slammed repeatedly into the concrete Zimmerman managed to unholster his weapon and shoot Martin at point blank range in the chest. What led up to the altercation makes no difference. Whether Trayvon Martin thought George Zimmerman was following him or not was not justification for his initial attack on George Zimmerman. And besides, Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch captain who was in contact with the police and he was on the lookout for a burglar that had hit several houses. The end result was Zimmerman exercised his right to self defense to save his own life and in doing so Trayvon Martin was killed. It was only after some Black racist politicians had stirred up public sentiment that anyone began to object to what happened. And they blamed the victim not the perpetrator. 


Almost every politician in America has some form of personal protection with them at all times. Be it a concealed handgun or a bodyguard, so they don't have to worry about being attacked. And many court judges are seldom exposed to violence in the streets so how could they understand what the young woman goes through walking through a parking lot late at night. Of course, many judges and politicians, usually Democrats, do understand that the game plan is to push for gun control and gun registration so they sway their opinions to further the disarming of America.

Monday, August 5, 2013

Fresh milk, more than what you think about.


I wouldn't have thought much about printing these photos that came from a friend yesterday. After all, everything about China seems a bit odd. But then I read a story on a Libertarian email bulletin and it all came into perspective. I'm guessing that Louis Pasteur didn't know what he was doing when he invented pasteurization to prevent disease. China has so many people they don't seem to care about such things. Wikipedia says: Pasteur's research showed that the growth of micro-organisms was responsible for spoiling beverages, such as beer, wine and milk. With this established, he invented a process in which liquids such as milk were heated to kill most bacteria and moulds already present within them. Claude Bernard and he completed the first test on April 20, 1862. This process was soon afterwards known as pasteurization.

Then again we have Fresh Milk in China. Right from the goats in the back of the van. At least they're not getting melamine added to make it "improved" like they have been shipping in dog food to America.

Now we hear from the Libertarian Party bulletin:  The Liberty Crier.

Oklahoma Legislator Pushes Raw Milk Delivery To Homes

August 4, 2013

cow raw milk 350x250 ssBy Wayne Greene
A Tulsa legislator wants to loosen state regulations of raw milk dairies to allow them to deliver directly to consumers.

“Basically, my hope is that we can make milkmen legal again,” said Rep. Ken Walker, R-Tulsa. “Since these customers already go to the farm, my sole purpose is to let the farmer deliver to the home.”

State law allows dairies to make “incidental” amounts of raw milk sales directly to consumers at farm sites.

Unlike other commercially available milk, raw milk is not pasteurized or homogenized.
Fans say it is creamier, sweeter, healthier and fresher, but skeptics worry about the potential for disastrous diseases – including rabies – to be spread.

Many other states allow home delivery of raw milk, and some allow raw milk sales in grocery stores, Walker said.

“I think people choose raw milk because the process of pasteurization robs the milk of nutrients, and a lot of people think there are health benefits to drinking raw milk,” he said.
Oklahoma Legislator Pushes Raw Milk Delivery To Homes [continued]
Is this progress or is this going backward? We used to have fresh milk delivered to our homes in the 1940s and it was still pasteurized. So why the push to eliminate the benefits of pasteurization since it has been proven to kill disease? Is this fresh (unpasteurized) raw milk movement the product of a mentality whose first priority is legalizing marijuana? Because that is what the Libertarian Party seems to have evolved from. Pot heads.

 
  

Sunday, August 4, 2013

Republicans not the only ones with foot-in-mouth disease. Catholic lawyer in Kenya sues Israel in the Hague over wrongful crucifixion of Jesus Christ.


I suspect that when the national news media gets this they will use it to try to make a lot more Christians hate Israel. The Blaze reported it on July 31st on their web site and my further research has revealed the details. A Catholic lawyer in Kenya has filed a lawsuit before the International Court of Justice in the Hague to place the blame for the death of Jesus Christ on Israel and nine other respondents. Now of course, the basis of the story is totally ridiculous, but given the fact that some Christians are influenced by negative news stories regarding matters of faith, i.e. recall the "don't vote for Mitt Romney because he isn't a Christian", this one could be used to further chip away at support for Israel among Christians. The English language Ghana web site Spy Ghana has the story:

Crucifixion Of Jesus; Pontius Pilate, King Harold (sic) Sued

By
Dola Indidis, a lawyer, Roman Catholic, and former spokesperson for the Kenyan Judiciary, filed the lawsuit regarding Jesus’ death with the International Court of Justice, the primary judicial branch of the United Nations based at The Hague in the Netherlands.
Indidis filed the lawsuit against Pontius Pilate, several Jewish elders, King Herod, Tiberius (Emperor of Rome 42 BC-37AD), the Republic of Italy and the State of Israel.
“I filed the case because it’s my duty to uphold the dignity of Jesus and I have gone to the ICJ to seek justice for the man from Nazareth,” Indidis told the Nairobian in a recent interview.
His selective and malicious prosecution violated his human rights through judicial misconduct, abuse of office bias and prejudice.”
Indidis claims the goal of his lawsuit is to have “a declaratory judgment declaration that the trial judgment and sentence entered were badly done and therefore null and void,” according to The Blaze.
Additionally, the lawyer argues that Jesus’ sentence was incompatible with Galilean law at the time, as the sentence for blasphemy was being stoned to death, not crucifixion.
According to the Jerusalem Post, Indidis named the Republic of Italy and the State of Israel in the lawsuit because when these two states gained independence, they incorporated the laws of the Roman Empire into their new government systems. These are the same laws that were in effect when Jesus was crucified.
Indidis initially submitted his case to the Kenyan High Court in Nairobi in 2007, but it was rejected for not having enough legal standing, especially since parties Indidis wishes to prosecute have been dead for 2,000 years.
Although Standard Media reports that the International Court of Justice has created a preliminary panel to consider Indidis’ case, an ICJ spokesperson told Legal Cheek that it would not be considering the case, as it is out of its jurisdiction.
Read the rest here:  http://www.spyghana.com/crucifixion-of-jesus-pontius-pilate-king-harold-sued/

And here is the complete 25-page lawsuit in .PDF format http://www.kenyalaw.org/Downloads_FreeCases/Trial%20of%20Jesus.pdf#page=1&zoom=70,0,792
Granted, according to the lawsuit, the State of Israel trails the list of respondents and is shown last in 10th place. But other than the Republic of Italy, all of the other respondents are long since deceased.
TIBERIUS (EMPEROR OF ROME 42BC-37AD) ............... 1ST RESPONDENT
PONTIUS PILATE (GOVERNOR OF JUDEA) ................  2ND RESPONDENT
ANNAS............................................... 3RD RESPONDENT
JEWISH CHIEF PRIEST ................................ 5TH RESPONDENT
JEWISH ELDERS....................................... 6TH RESPONDENT
JEWISH TEACHERS OF THE LAW...........................7TH RESPONDENT
KING HEROD ..........................................8TH RESPONDENT
THE REPUBLIC OF ITALY .............................. 9TH RESPONDENT
THE STATE OF ISRAEL ............................... 10TH RESPONDENT
Here is the original story on The Blaze:

There’s a Lawyer Petitioning the Hague Court Over the Unfair Trial of…Jesus

A Kenyan lawyer has petitioned the International Court of Justice in the Hague asking it to declare that the trial of Jesus 2,000 years ago was invalid, because it was conducted in a manner contrary to the principles of a fair trial, media in Kenya and Israel report.

Lawyer Dola Indidis who is a former spokesman for Kenya’s Judiciary says, “I want a declaratory judgment declaration that the trial judgment and sentence entered were badly done and therefore null and void.”

Indidis first filed his case on behalf of the ‘Friends of Jesus’ in 2007 in Kenya’s High Court in Nairobi, but the court ruled it had no jurisdiction.

He then filed his case at the UN’s top judicial body in the Hague against Tiberius (Emperor of Rome 42 BC-37AD), Pontius Pilate, a selection of Jewish elders, King Herod, the Republic of Italy and the State of Israel, the Jerusalem Post reports.


From Doug Giles' ClashDaily.com, Allan Erickson writes, I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS, MR. OBAMA....


I Have a Few Questions, Mr Obama …



. . . since the mainstream media won’t ask.

Questions for the President at his next press conference:

Four dead in Benghazi and many seriously injured under suspicious circumstances, a government cover up, witnesses gagged, questions unanswered, investigations derailed. That’s not a scandal?

Reporters’ records seized, false allegations leveled by DOJ, reporters threatened, reporters and editors prevented from doing their jobs, cover ups, government intimidation. That’s not a scandal?

Guns run to drug cartels in Mexico, hundreds killed with them, including our border agents, no follow through to arrest perpetrators, instead, cover up, allegations that American guns cause Mexican violence, border security virtually ignored, government interference with investigations. That’s not a scandal?

The EPA used as a legislative arm of the executive branch installing rules that Congress voted down, a clear violation of the Constitution. The EPA used to persecute political opposition. Not a scandal?
NSA surveillance you authorized seriously suspected of violating citizen rights, and that’s not a scandal?

Recess appointments and illegal war in Libya, both impeachable offenses. Not a scandal?

The IRS used to stomp down conservative groups so they cannot educate and influence citizens about Founding principles which contradict your radicalism. This is clearly an unconstitutional use of power, amounting to illegal political activity. That is a phony scandal?

ObamaCare, passed illegally and unethically, called a train wreck by the very man that helped write it and get it through Congress, promises to bankrupt the country, a measure designed to redistribute wealth, not provide care, a series of laws and regulations violating privacy, the doctor-patient relationship, and the sovereignty of the states. That is not a scandal?

Your records, Mr. President. You’ve released virtually nothing about your life, your education, your term in the Illinois legislature, nothing. Now a respected country sheriff and his investigators, along with document experts, insist the birth certificate you released is a forgery. This means you are hiding something, that it is likely you are not “natural born”, a requirement in the Constitution for becoming President. And this is not a scandal, Mr. Obama?

What would qualify as a scandal in your view, Mr. Obama? Oh. That’s right. You have already answered that question. It’s scandalous for citizens to own guns, possess private property, keep the fruits of their labor, determine for themselves what kind of schools they prefer, select their own doctor, speak up about matters of conscience, freely exercise their religion, advocate original founding principles, or worse yet, join the Tea Party.

About the author: Allan Erickson

Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Ten years ago he started his own training and recruitment company in the Pacific Northwest. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is also the author of "The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence," Tate Publishing, 2012. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and freedom. To contact him, email: allanlerickson@gmail.com

Saturday, August 3, 2013

From Israel, Adina Kutnicki commentary on BENGHAZIGATE’s CRIMINAL Cover Up: Hiding Witnesses, Changing Identities & Repeatedly Polygraphing CIA Survivors




BENGHAZIGATE’s CRIMINAL Cover Up: Hiding Witnesses, Changing Identities & Repeatedly Polygraphing CIA Survivors…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


Criminals engage in cover ups all the time. The more heinous the crime, the more elaborate the tracks. Yet, many times they are caught as a result of their backpedaling. This will (eventually) be the case with Obama Inc., as this gangster-like regime attempts classic subterfuge, knowing full well that the lying media has their backs. Yes, they do, but not the alternative one. 
From the onset, this site has featured Benghazigate as an impeachable offense, but certainly not the only one. Far from it. Dear heavens, what has become of the gateway to freedom, at least when compared to many other nations? Hardly perfect, but certainly better than most – until now.
So, when this site posited that it was the Pyromaniac-in-Chief’s ‘missing time’ which required ‘outing’, it was precisely to explain why Obama Inc. was moving mountains to keep survivor’s mouths shut! Can anyone imagine the domestic ramifications, let alone worldwide reverberations, for it to become widely known – via major media outlets, that is, if they conduct their due diligence – that the leader of the free world was engaging in ‘risky monkey business’, as Benghazi exploded and Americans were slaughtered in Libya? This blogger feels in need of a shower, just reporting on it, but gay sex, alcohol and illegal substances were on the menu! H E L L O…political earthquake time.
The above explosion is in conjunction with the real reason for the overthrow of Qadaffi; to facilitate the largest weapons smuggling operation in U.S. history, albeit without the advice and consent of Congress. Yes, even CNN is confirming said gun running conclusions…nice of them to jump on board! In fact, Syria’s Brotherhood Mafia was the immediate intended beneficiary, but not the only one. After all, there are many Brothers to take care of. This was reported herein back in November 2012 (and fully explained within the attached links), a full 9 months ago, and 2 months after the regime’s mouthpieces started weaving their (video) tales. Mind you, for being an ‘obedient spinner’, Susan Rice was amply rewarded, as the Liar-in-Chief’s National Security Adviser! Does it get any more twisted? It is as if Al Capone is running the free world and handing out rewards to his enforcers, not unlike in the Sicilian Mafia via the capo di tutti capi, the “boss of all bosses”. Pinkie swears.
In light of the aforementioned, isn’t it clear why the CIA is polygraphing Benghazigate witnesses almost monthly (unheard of in the history of the Agency), while Obama Inc is hiding the survivors and changing their names as well?
BREAKING>>> GOP Rep: Obama WH Is Hiding Benghazi Survivors AND CHANGING THEIR NAMES (Video)

Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, August 1, 2013, 9:40 PM

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) was on with Greta Van Susteren Thursday to discuss the Obama scandals.
This came after Jake Tapper at CNN broke the news that there were “dozens” of CIA operatives on the ground in Benghazi on 9-11 when the consulate came under attack and the agency is going to great lengths to make sure whatever it was doing, remains a secret.
Gowdy told Greta the Obama Administration is hiding the survivors, dispersing them around the country, AND changing their names.
“Including changing names, creating aliases. Stop and think what things are most calculated to get at the truth? Talk to people with first-hand knowledge. What creates the appearance and perhaps the reality of a cover-up? Not letting us talk with people who have the most amount of information, dispersing them around the country and changing their names.”
And, at the same time Obama is hiding the survivors around the country he’s calling Benghazi a ‘phony’ scandal.
While all these criminal acts are coming to the fore via alternative media, doesn’t it become easier to internalize the ‘whys and wherefores’ of those who keep ‘dropping like flies’?
Patriots, let us agree on one thing: This regime, with Barack HUSSEIN Obama in the vanguard, must be led into jail cells. Think of it thusly: akin to a two-fer. For if ‘Obama Gotta Go’, so too must Hill, and her dreams of becoming the next POTUS will go up in smoke! Btw, Humala, Hill’s Deputy COS and wifey of deviant Weiner – wanna be Mayor of NYC – will surely be dragged in.
Faster…faster…nowhere to run, nowhere to hide!

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Major Nidal Malik Hasan clarifies for all what other Muslims must feel about America.


Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the self-described Muslim Soldier of Allah, who is in prison awaiting Court Martial for multiple counts of murder, sent hand-written and typed documents to Fox News describing his actions on November 5, 2009 at Fort Hood, Texas. Nidal Malik Hasan is accused of the mass shooting of unarmed servicemen and women with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder which occurred less than a month before he was due to deploy to Afghanistan. In the documents he speaks of how he considers his Muslim faith to be at odds with his American citizenship and allegiance with the United States Constitution.
In the only document bearing a date -- Oct. 18, 2012 -- Hasan writes: "I, Nidal Malik Hasan, am compelled to renounce any oaths of allegiances that require me to support/defend (any - sic) man made constitution (like the constitution of the United States) over the commandments mandated in Islam ... I therefore formally renounce my oath of office ... this includes my oath of U.S. citizenship."

In another document, the only one which is typed, Hasan declares that American democracy and Shariah law are incompatible. "There is an inherent and irreconcilable conflict. ... in an American Democracy 'we the people' govern according to what 'we the people' think is right or wrong; even if it specifically goes against what All-Mighty God commands."
These admissions by Major Hasan also address what kind of relationship other Muslims living in America must be thinking about, because to be a devout Muslim who follows the commands of the Prophet Mohammad in the Qur'an, all Muslims must hold their religion in higher regard than their citizenship. All devout Muslims must feel compelled to wage war against every non-Muslim as they do every day in the Middle East. Maybe those here that feel the same way as Major Hasan should follow his example and renounce their citizenship, as well, and leave American soil before they feel obligated to commit Jihad against the rest of us. And, yes, we already knew that Islam was not compatible with our Constitutional Republic, which is exactly why Islamic Sharia law must never be allowed in our court rooms.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides. And I am not a Muslim.

 

Patriot Humor: If Obama had a city... what would it be?


The President's City

July 30, 2013

2013-07-30-humor-1
2013-07-30-humor-2
2013-07-30-humor-3
2013-07-30-humor-4

 2013-07-30-humor-5