The terrorist attack on the Boston Marathon: If we are going to look everywhere then lets start looking.

It doesn't surprise me when certain ultra-leftists in the news media display their total bias and start pointing fingers at conservative groups to suggest they were behind some recent attack. As an example, soon after it became known that the shooter in the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado was identified as John Holmes one commentator immediately went to the Colorado Tea Party web site and found someone named John Holmes was a member and began accusing the Tea Party as the perpetrators. It was some days later that we learned the shooter was a different John Holmes. But what really does surprise me is how often conservative web sites have a penchant for ignoring other conservative sources when they look for suspects or dig into some details after a terrorist attack such as the one that caused so many deaths and injuries at The Boston Marathon. Below is a snip from a very reliable source that has some interesting information about the original "person of interest" that was investigated and cleared by the FBI. I have found this information repeated on only two web sites. The big question is why is it not being headlined everywhere. The author, Walid Shoebat, is a well respected Muslim who has revealed many inside secrets about The Muslim Brotherhood since he was once a member.

“Innocent” Saudi has ties to several Al-Qaeda Terrorists

By Shoebat Foundation on April 17, 2013 in Blog, General

Walid Shoebat

A couple of weeks ago we warned America about the very serious problem of Saudi infiltration; many of these Saudi nationals criminals and terrorists.

After the bombings, a Saudi by the name of Abdul Rahman Ali Al-Harbi was hospitalized and became a ‘suspect’, then a ‘person of interest’. His apartment was searched by federal and local authorities. No confirmation has been given so far to his involvement. The Media were quick to claim his innocence, of course.

This brings us to the Boston marathon bombings. Foreign Policy is reporting that he’s ‘no longer a person of interest’, which means he’s “innocent”, right?

Perhaps a quick look at the Arabic sources should raise the eyebrows of every American relative to the extent of the problem at hand. Many from Al-Harbi’s clan are steeped in terrorism and are members of Al-Qaeda. Out of a list of 85 terrorists listed by the Saudi government shows several of Al-Harbi clan to have been active fighters in Al-Qaeda:

#15 Badr Saud Uwaid Al-Awufi Al-Harbi
#73 Muhammad Atiq Uwaid Al-Awufi Al-Harbi
#26 Khalid Salim Uwaid Al-Lahibi Al-Harbi
#29 Raed Abdullah Salem Al-Thahiri Al-Harbi
#43 Abdullah Abdul Rahman Muhammad Al-Harbi (leader)
#60 Fayez Ghuneim Humeid Al-Hijri Al-Harbi

Source: http://aalhameed1.net/vb/showthread.php?t=1565

Then you have Al-Harbi clan members in Gitmo:

Salim Salman Awadallah Al-Sai’di Al-Harbi
Majid Abdullah Hussein Al-Harbi
Muhammad Abdullah Saqr Al-Alawi Al-Harbi
Ghanem Abdul Rahman Ghanem Al-Harbi
Muhammad Atiq Uwaid Al-Awfi Al-Harbi

Source: http://www.muslm.net/vb/showthread.php?169019-أسماء-(90)-سعودياً-لا-زالوا-محتجزين-في-جوانتانامو

There are specific Saudi clans that are rife with members of Al-Qaeda, which makes it quite alarming as to why nearly a hundred thousand student visas are issued to these. Americans are clueless as to clan ties when it comes to terrorism.

Read the rest here: http://shoebat.com/2013/04/17/innocent-saudi-has-ties-to-several-al-qaeda-terrorists/

Piecing together what I have read it appears that the FBI is not being completely open in what they are telling the public. One little detail they have omitted was explaining the presence of the bomb-sniffing dogs at the start and finish line of the race and the announcements that they were only conducting a drill. It certainly suggests they had some clue that something was about to happen but unfortunately they were looking in the wrong place. Perhaps they cannot make any such admissions because the Obama administration has ordered all references to Muslims and Islam banished from the FBI training manuals. It is comforting to read in the mainstream news media the acknowledgement about the al-Qaida English language web site magazine called Inspire that published a story a year ago entitled "How To Make A Bomb In The Kitchen Of Your Mom" and gave details on using a pressure cooker. 

The highest offices of our government have become compromised by Muslim groups such as CAIR and The Muslim Brotherhood who have all gained undue access after a Muslim Democrat named Barack Hussein Obama got elected. And even recently Obama has given preferential treatment to visa requests by Saudi Arabian nationals. One perfect example of this Muslim influence is the fact that an Army Major named Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who identified himself as a "Soldier Of Allah" committed mass murder at Ft. Hood, Texas. While shooting and killing unarmed soldiers he yelled "Allahu Akbar" Allah Is Great at his victims just like other typical Islamic terrorist attacks yet the government declared the Ft. Hood shooting to be a "workplace violence" incident and four years later his Court Martial is still going on. With such power to deflect intentions and associations of Muslim terrorists it may mean the true cause behind the bombings at The Boston Marathon will never be known.

UPDATE: Picked this up from Pamela Geller's Atlas Shrugs web site"

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Saudi National in Boston Bombing being deported on "National Security Grounds"

Steve Emerson just broke the shocking news that the Saudi National, Abdul al-Harbi, first questioned in the Boston bombing, is going to be deported on "national security grounds." He is from a very powerful Saudi family with many terrorist ties. Abdul al-Harbi is a devout Muslim from Medina.

I said it takes longer than 15 hours to investigate all of Abdul al-Harbi's relatives, friends, acquaintances, and business and school friends.

Perhaps a quick look at the Arabic sources should raise the eyebrows of every American relative to the extent of the problem at hand. Many from Al-Harbi’s clan are steeped in terrorism and are members of Al-Qaeda. Out of a list of 85 terrorists listed by the Saudi government shows several of Al-Harbi clan to have been active fighters in Al-Qaeda:

When I heard he was from a very powerful Saudi family, I worried about this kind of thing happening.

Secretary of State Kerry's meeting with the Saudi Foreign Minister Saud Al-Faisal was abruptly closed to the press the day Abdul al-Harbi was being questioned. There is no doubt in my mind that this was discussed.

Today's embarassing display of rolling incompetence and badly mangled leaks led to numerous cancellations of press conferences, mis-identified suspects, promises of imminent arrest, walking back the arrest announcement, and more. They said they would release a statement and then said they wouldn't. 

Very smelly.

UPDATE: IOTW has the photo of the two suspects being sought here. A lot more here.

UPDATE:  Reuters saying Obama met with the Saudis (thanks to IOTW)

- U.S. President Barack Obama met with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal at the White House on Wednesday and discussed the conflict in Syria, a spokeswoman said.
The meeting was not on Obama’s public schedule.

The spokeswoman, Caitlin Hayden, said the president joined a meeting between the Saudi official and Obama’s national security adviser, Tom Donilon.

  

The short history behind America's gun culture.

1. "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson

2. "Those who trade liberty for security have neither." ~ John Adams

3. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms. (see phrase, Endowed by their Creator in The Declaration of Independence.)

4. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.

6. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.

7. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.

8. Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.

9. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.

10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.

11. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday. (figure needs to be updated since Obama became the gun salesman of the century)

12. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.

13. The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.

14. What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?

15. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.

16. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.

17. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.

Why doesn't our government believe that charity begins at home?

  
The news came out in the last few days that Barack Hussein Obama was giving away more money to the United Nations than in previous years. The Obama administration released its fiscal 2014 budget on Wednesday, totaling $52 billion in foreign assistance and support funding. The 2014 request of $1.57 billion for international organizations marks an increase from the $1.55 billion allotted in 2012. The United Nations regular budget, under this plan, would receive $617 million, up from its 2012 funding of $568 million, as part of the total increased $1.2 billion allotted to the United Nations and its affiliated agencies. 

Almost none of the recipient foreign countries actually like us and many actually hate America. Most of the money we give them goes into the off-shore bank accounts of the dictators or ruling party officials that run the countries.

This leads up to the following set of figures that illustrate the extent of our stupid generosity. The email that was sent to me asks this question: "Someone please tell me what the HELL's wrong with all the people that run this country!!!!!" I know the answer to that question, we try to buy our friends but we all know that you can't do that. The fools who run the government think they can.

Both Democrats and Republicans say, "We're broke" and we can't help our own Seniors, Veterans, Orphans, Homeless, Etc.,?????

But, over the last several years THEY have provided direct cash aid to....

Hamas - $351 Million,
Libya $1.45 Billion,
Egypt - $397 Million,
Mexico - $622 Million (in addition to Eric Holder's gun running scheme),
Russia - $380 Million,
Haiti - $1.4 Billion,
Jordan - $463 Million,
Kenya - $816 Million,
Sudan - $870 Million,
Nigeria - $456 Million,
Uganda - $451 Million,
Congo - $359 Million,
Ethiopia - $981 Million,
Pakistan - $2 Billion,
South Africa - $566 Million,
Senegal - $698 Million,
Mozambique - $404 Million,
Zambia - $331 Million,
Kazakhstan - $304 Million,
Iraq - $1.08 Billion (in addition to letting them keep their oil export profits),
Tanzania - $554 Million,

...with literally Billions of Dollars and they still hate us!!!!

But on the other hand, our retired seniors, living on a 'fixed income,' receive NO aid!

Nor do they get any breaks, while our government and religious organizations will pour Hundreds of Billions Of $$$$$$'s and Tons of Food to Foreign Countries!

Someone needs to explain to them that Charity begins AT HOME!!!

There does appear to be one person in our government who does understand that charity begins at home. At least as far as it concerns himself. That person is Barack Hussein Obama, who has taken more multi-million dollar vacations than any other leader of our nation. He has taken three vacations so far this year, one per month. He has played hundreds of rounds of golf and spent millions of dollars flying around the country on Air Force One pushing his gun control program. It costs $179,750 per hour to fly that airplane. Michelle Obama routinely takes dozens of her friends along with her on her vacations all at taxpayer's expense.

Bias in our liberal news media. Doctor kills 100 babies, no one in media cares.

He's Black, he's (obviously) a Democrat, he's an abortion doctor, he kills babies born alive but the mainstream news media has ignored his murder trial in Philadelphia. His name is Dr. Kermit Gosnell.  One Congressman, Republican Rep. Chris Smith from New Jersey said: 'If Gosnell Had Shot Seven Infants with an AR-15, It Would Be National News'. The story isn't about Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice, the story is about the Hollywood-style horror images coming from the eye-witnesses in the trial. Born alive babies screaming as this butcher cut their spinal cords with a pair of scissors to make them die on a table in his abortion clinic. Breitbard.com ran this story yesterday.

Photo: Empty 'Reserved Media Seating' at Abortion Doc Gosnell's Murder Trial

---

by John Nolte 12 Apr 2013 

Via the Get Religion blog at Patheos:

The picture above, for what it’s worth, is of the reserved media seats at the Gosnell trial. It was taken by JD Mullane, a news writer and columnist for the Bucks County Courier Times, The Intel and the Burlington County (NJ) Times. He says:

Sat through a full day of testimony at the Kermitt Gosnell trial today. It is beyond the most morbid Hollywood horror. It will change you.

I was surprised by the picture and asked “really?” He responded “Local press was there, Inky, PhillyMag, NBC10 blogger. Court staff told me nobody else has shown up.”

You need to read the full story.

Dr. Susan Berry wrote a different story about this on Brietbart.com quoting the New Jersey Congressman: “If Dr. Gosnell had walked into a nursery and shot seven infants with an AR-15, it would be national news and the subject of presidential hand-wringing,” said Smith, a member of the House pro-life caucus." 

LifeSiteNews reports that Smith accused the national media of almost uniformly discounting the trial of the abortionist who allegedly snipped the spinal cords of babies who were born alive during abortion procedures in his clinic. Smith referred to the media’s decision to ignore the trial as a deliberate “cover-up.”

"Will the decades-long major national news media cover-up of the brutality—and violence—of abortion methods ever end?" asked Smith. "Will Americans ever be told the horrifying details as to how—and how often—abortionists dismember, decapitate, and chemically poison innocent babies?"

Testimony in the Gosnell trial, that has included descriptions of gruesome acts of beheadings, abuse, death, and body parts of babies in jars, has led to the abortionist’s clinic being labeled a “house of horrors.”

He quoted an editorial in Investors Business Daily entitled, “Newtown in the Clinic: Media ignore the Gosnell Trial,” which chastised a media “transfixed by Newtown” as well as “a basketball coach who shoves and curses at his players,” but provides no coverage of a Philadelphia abortionist on trial for murdering a woman and seven infants.
From the article:

Everybody has heard of Mike Rice, the disgraced former Rutgers basketball coach who was fired after video surfaced of him shoving, kicking and yelling at his players, throwing basketballs at them and — most damning — using "homophobic slurs."

According to the Media Research Center, in one week Rice received 41 minutes, 26 seconds of air time on ABC, CBS and NBC in 36 separate news stories. Gosnell received zero coverage.

Criticizing President Obama for exploiting the Newtown massacre to push a “de facto repeal of the Second Amendment,” on the grounds that if it could save one life it would be worth it, the editorial goes on to point out that, as a state senator, Obama twice voted against a bill entitled the “Born Alive Infant Protection Act.” That bill, IBD notes, "Defined a baby who 'breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of the voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut' as a legal person entitled to the full protection of the law, regardless of the circumstances of its birth."

The dam finally burst the other day when a columnist named Kirsten Powers wrote an opinion piece in USA Today asking why the national news media was ignoring this story. And then suddenly everyone was showing up in court to cover it.

Philadelphia abortion clinic horror: Column

Kirsten Powers 8:49 p.m. EDT April 11, 2013

We've forgotten what belongs on Page One.

Infant beheadings. Severed baby feet in jars. A child screaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven't heard about these sickening accusations?

It's not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page. The revolting revelations of Gosnell's former staff, who have been testifying to what they witnessed and did during late-term abortions, should shock anyone with a heart.

NBC-10 Philadelphia reported that, Stephen Massof, a former Gosnell worker, "described how he snipped the spinal cords of babies, calling it, 'literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the body." One former worker, Adrienne Moton, testified that Gosnell taught her his "snipping" technique to use on infants born alive.

John Nolte at Brietbart.com reported on the mea culpas coming in from different news outlets who were obviously embarrassed by Kirsten Powers' story.

Media Acknowledge Blowing Gosnell Story, Pledge Extensive Coverage

Bloomberg columnist Jeffrey Goldberg writes: "It’s too late now, though, to suppress coverage. [Kirsten] Powers and others have shamed the media into paying attention, and the press is now on the case. It’s remarkable that it took this long."

The Washington Post: "We believe the story is deserving of coverage by our own staff, and we intend to send a reporter for the resumption of the trial next week. In retrospect, we should have sent a reporter sooner."

Politico's Dylan Byers: "Gosnell should be front-page, top-of-the-hour news by primetime tonight. And if it's not, we'll write about it again."

NBC's Joe Scarborough: "A horrifying story out of Philadelphia that the media must cover. We will cover this on Monday." 

Now if only someone in the national news would comment on the Democrats disgusting use of the Newtown, Connecticut tragedy and the unending display of the photos of those 20 dead first graders to foster their anti-gun plan, maybe we can end more of this media bias. But that will never happen because to the leftists in our government and in our media the highest priority they have is doing away with the Second Amendment. With all of the hoopla following Newtown there hasn't been one criticism of the the anti-gun plan's inability to stop criminals from having guns or how they would prevent another mass killing.

  

Heroes of the NRA shaft American gun owners. Again.

We have the National Rifle Association to thank for giving us leftist Democrat Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House in 2008 and all of the Socialist legislation she got passed including Obamacare. In 2010, still suffering from gross tunnel vision, the NRA tried to do the same all over again but the monumental Tea Party movement squashed their plan. The NRA had endorsed even more Democrats than two years before but only 26 got reelected then. Now, more heroes of the NRA, in spite of their NRA endorsements for supporting our Second Amendment rights have stopped the effort of Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul, a staunch conservative, from conducting a filibuster to prevent the U.S. Senate from bringing up life-long anti-gun Democrat Socialist Barack Hussein Obama's gun control bills. The Democrats plan to disarm law-abiding Americans is slowly moving ahead and tyranny is beginning to stir awake in the shadows. And the specter of civil war looms closer at hand.

This raises the question, how does one become a hero of the NRA? Liberal Democrat Senator Harry Reid used to be one before the 2010 elections but a conservative Republican candidate named Sharron Angle, an NRA Life Member and Tea Party favorite ran against Reid that year and was so popular that the NRA decided not to endorse anyone for the Senate race in Nevada. In spite of the lack of endorsement the NRA still gave lots of favorable publicity to Reid when he helped get a shooting range built in his state. Democrat Sen. Harry Reid is the Senate Majority Leader who runs the machine that moves the bills up for a vote. The only requirement looked at by the NRA is an elected representative to pledge to uphold the Second Amendment regardless of their political party or their stand on any other issues. And the NRA policy favors incumbents. Rather than look at the whole range of issues that are used to judge conservatives from liberals such as fiscal responsibility, national defense, abortion, crime and foreign relations, a liberal politician from a state that has a high interest in guns needs only to take that single stand to be endorsed by the NRA but there is no guarantee that politician will honor their pledge and since liberal politicians have much less ethics and character than conservatives, it is more likely that they will buckle under to party pressure and vote the party line.

Senators Joe Manchin, Democrat from West Virginia, and Pat Toomey, Republican from Pennsylvania (two states with a high interest in guns) are both "A" rated by the NRA and both were endorsed by the NRA for reelection. And that same NRA endorsement of 53 Democrats in 2008 which helped in the election of 52 of them allowed the Democrats to gain the majority in the House and the subsequent election of Democrat Nancy Pelose to be Speaker of the House and third in line for President.

ABC News’ Jeff Zeleny and Sunlen Miller report:
Sens. Joe Manchin and Pat Toomey announced a bipartisan compromise today seeking to expand background checks for the sale of guns – both at gun shows and online – that could help break the impasse in the gun-control debate in Congress.

The deal would be added as an amendment to existing gun legislation in the Senate. It opens the door to the biggest potential change in U.S. gun laws in nearly two decades, but still faces deep questions and lingering opposition when the Senate begins voting Thursday on whether to proceed with the gun debate.

When asked by ABC News whether he was worried about risking his “A” ranking with the National Rifle Association, Toomey said:  “What matters to me is doing the right thing. And I think it’s the right thing.”

Here are the names of the 21 NRA "A" Rated Senators who sold out American gun owners. Wonder how many will be endorsed by the NRA next time they are up for reelection?

Republicans
Saxby Chambliss (Ga.) – NRA A rated
Tom Coburn (Okla.) – NRA A rated
Susan Collins (Maine) – NRA C+ rated
Bob Corker (Tenn.) – NRA A rated
Jeff Flake (Ariz.) – NRA A rated
Lindsey Graham (S.C.) – NRA A rated
Dean Heller (Nev.) – NRA A rated
John Hoeven (N.D.) – NRA A rated
Johnny Isakson (Ga.) – NRA A rated
Mark Kirk (Ill.) – NRA F rated
John McCain (Ariz.) – NRA B+ rated
Pat Toomey (Pa.) – NRA A rated
Roger Wicker (Miss.) – NRA A+ rated

Democrats
Max Baucus (Mont.) - NRA A rated
Bob Casey (Pa) - NRA A rated
Joe Donnelly (Ind.) - NRA A rated
Martin Heinrich (N.M.) - NRA A rated
Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.) - NRA A rated
Joe Manchin (W.Va.) - NRA A rated
Tim Johnson (S.D.) - NRA A rated
Jon Tester (Mont.) - NRA A rated
John Warner (Va.) - NRA A rated

One single character trait of a spineless, wishy-washy politician is when they start saying things about feeling a need to compromise or that we need to do the right thing or we all must work together. A sane person would ask, Why? Why do you feel a need to get along with the opposition? Why are you compelled to compromise your principles? Such as when RINO Senator John McCain told an audience in his 2008 Presidential campaign that he would never say anything bad about a fellow member of the Senate. That fellow member of the Senate being the Communist-mentored Muslim Democrat Socialist Barack Hussein Obama who was planning to fundamentally change America into a Marxist Police State. So what are the consequences of this sell-out compromise bill that Manchin and Toomey slipped into a vote?

WND.com  reported the compromise bill: "The legislation offered by Toomey and Manchin would allow doctors to enter mental health records into the national background check system without violating privacy laws."

"But Gun Owners of America characterized that as the “See a Shrink, Lose your Guns” bill."

"The group may have been referring to an accusation by an attorney in Hamburg, N.Y., that the state police are suspending the handgun permits of people who have been prescribed anti-anxiety medication."

Thanks to the Socialized Medicine bill that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi got passed in their typically underhanded way, the same bill that Pelosi famously stated as "You have to pass it before you can read it", our Doctors are now on the front lines of Obama's snitch patrol. Tell a secret to your doctor and a whole army of unelected busybody bureaucrats begin to decide what rights you have. I wonder how far that will go? Will your local drug store keep tabs on your over the counter pain medication? Can a migraine headache prevent you from owning a gun? They will all have access to your confidential conversations that your doctor makes notes about because your electronic medical records will be scrutinized by those unelected Washington bureaucrats. I stand corrected, they already do. Health insurance companies are buying up credit card purchasing records from retail stores to see who is buying tobacco and alcohol products and cross referencing them with their client list to deny medical coverage for any related illnesses. See my blog Saturday, March 23, 2013 Hey, America, you asked for it. You voted for them. Now you're going to get it. Big Brother is watching everything.

So now the salesman's foot is in the doorway, the Senate will begin debating Obama's plans and the arm twisting will begin. And if you propose 1 evil measure and it fails - you lose everything but if you propose 100 evil measures and hope some will pass you still come out ahead. That seems to be the plan to break apart the dozens of Gun Control proposals the anti-gun leftists dreamed up and have each one become a separate law. But wait, as the junk ads on TV always say, there is more. The liberal Democrats and RINO Republicans will always have the United Nations global gun ban treaty to fall back on if the Obama anti-gun plan suddenly fails. Now our future investment in freedom and liberty resides in the Republican controlled House of Representatives. Led by another RINO name John Boehner, famous for his fake sun tans and crocodile tears. Will he too be more interested in compromise than principles? The Doomsday Clock is ticking. 

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides and I am a Life Member of the Gun Owners of America. We do not compromise when we are right.

 

Note to American news media: Go ahead and make more excuses for them.

This in from Jihad Watch. Egyptian Muslims raping a Christian woman in broad daylight yelling "Allahu akbar" (Allah is Great). The woman is being raped because she is a Christian. But according to the leftist American news media this sort of thing is not motivated by religion so we must not place blame on innocent Muslims. What this video shows is the kind of conduct that is typical when Muslims outnumber Christians or have a significant percentage of the population. This same thing happens in India and in some European countries today. As long as they are a minority they pretend to obey our laws. So why do so many Muslims work in America to change our laws to follow their Islamic Sharia code? But of course there are always a few Muslims in America who still want to fight Allah's war against the non-believers. We read about them every day but our news media refuses to identify their religion.

Islam is different from every other religion in the world in one significant regard. While other religions generally follow some version of the Golden Rule, teach peace toward fellow man and/or follow the Ten Commandments, Islam teaches hatred toward everyone who is not a believer in Islam, and specifically names Christians and Jews in the Qur'an as being the most reviled; Islam calls them "People of the book" meaning The Bible and The Torah. While one law in the Ten Commandments says "Thou Shall Not Kill" and it is directed toward everyone, Islam says thous shall not kill another Muslim but it is alright to kill a non-believer. "Allah is an enemy to unbelievers." - Sura - 2:98. "Slay them wherever ye find them and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter." - Sura - 2:191. "O believers, take not Jews and Christians as friends; they are friends of each other. Those of you who make them his friends is one of them. God does not guide an unjust people." Sura - 5:54. "Fight unbelievers who are near to you." Sura - 9:123 (different translation: Believers! Make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Let them find harshness in you. (another source: ) Ye who believe! Murder those of the disbelievers.... "Muslims are harsh against the unbelievers, merciful to one another." Sura - 48:25. "The unbelievers among the People of the Book and the pagans shall burn forever in the fire of hell. They are the vilest of all creatures." Sura - 98:51.

#MyJihad in Egypt: Muslim mob screaming "Allahu akbar" rapes Christian woman in broad daylight 

They're shouting "Nasara! Nasara! Nasara!" (Christians! Christians! Christians!) as they set upon the terrified woman. And then "Allahu akbar" (Allah is greatest) and "There is no god but Allah."
But remember: it is "hate" to oppose this savagery.

(Video thanks to Mark George.)

Posted by Robert on April 9, 2013 10:05 AM

You can read a cookbook and still never be a good cook. You have to be taught the techniques and steps to turn raw food into a feast. You can play violent video games that allows you to kill and maim hundreds of people and while that may make you somewhat anti-social, it won’t automatically turn you into a terrorist. Neither will reading the Qur’an every day turn you into a terrorist unless someone educates you about the purpose of this book of commands by the Prophet Mohammed and reminds you of some of these commands. Mohammed was a leader of a military rebellion who invented Islam as a force to bind his army together. He chose the crescent moon as the symbol of his new religion, a symbol that before Islam existed belonged to the pagan moon god Allah and today stands atop every mosque in the world. Then Mohammed claimed that Allah was the god of the Islam he invented. His so-called religion was based upon and still consists of a barbaric 7th Century way of life. In the 1400 years since it was created, Islam has been responsible for over 270-million deaths in its quest for world domination.

There is no peace in the Religion of Peace and neither is there love for their fellow mankind. There is no compassion or forgiveness in this book only hatred for the non-believers and the People of the Book (the Christian’s Holy Bible and the Hebrew Torah). There is no “golden rule” as is universally thought as, “"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you".

According to the publication entitled, Statistical Islam, an analytical examination of the words contained in the three books of Islam: the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith, the first step in convincing a Muslim of his duty to Islam is to remind him that his Prophet Mohammed was a “perfect Muslim” and the Koran does this no fewer than 91 times. This publication also points out that only 1/3 of the Qur'an applies to Muslims and 2/3 of it is hatred directed against people of other religions.

“He is the divine human prototype, the only pattern acceptable to Allah. The actions and words of Mohammed are so important that they have a special name—Sunna. We find the Sunna in two texts. The Sira is the biography of Mohammed and the Hadith is the collection of hadiths (small stories, traditions) about Mohammed.”

Islam is based on Koran and Sunna. Since the Sunna is found in the Sira and the Hadith, this means that three books contain all the doctrine of Islam—the Trilogy. If it is in the Trilogy (Koran, Sira, Hadith), then it is Islam. If something is not in the Trilogy, then it is not Islam. All of the Islamic doctrine is found in the Trilogy. Now, we have the complete information with no missing pieces.

We have established our first criteria of knowledge. All authoritative statements about Islam must include a reference to the Trilogy to be authenticated. It does not matter what a scholar, imam, media guru, or anyone else says, if what they say cannot be supported by the doctrine in the Trilogy, then it is not Islam. If it is supported by the Trilogy, then it is Islam.

We have been taught that the Koran is the source of Islamic doctrine. However, the Koran is only 14% of the total sacred texts1. Actually, the Sira and the Hadith are 86% of the total textual doctrine2. Islam is 14% Allah and 86% Mohammed. This is very good news. The Koran is obscure, but anyone can understand the life and sayings of Mohammed. These statistics point to the easy way to know Islam—know Mohammed. Anyone, absolutely anyone, can understand Mohammed and hence, Islam.

Muslims know these are facts and therefore work very hard to keep the politically correct news media from writing about them. They have dreamed up a cunning counter-attack by labeling their opponents Islamophobes, people who fear Islam supposedly for no reason, but those who know the truth say: "It isn't Islamophobia when they really are trying to kill you."

Seven years after 19 Muslims hijacked 4 airliners and killed almost 3,000 Americans on 9/11/2001, the news media covered up the background for a one-time Muslim Democrat and helped him get elected. And today, the government has purged its training manuals from all mention of terrorists and Muslims and Islam and the U.S. Army has now labeled Christians, along with al-Qaeda and the KKK as being terrorist organizations.

 

New World Order (conspiracy theory)? Not any more. Joe Biden has now officially called for it.

Biden: ‘Affirmative Task’ Before Us Is to ‘Create a New World Order’

Vice President Joe Biden calls for the creation of a "new world order" at the Export Import Bank conference in Washington on April 5, 2013.

By Nicholas Ballasy http://pjmedia.com/blog/biden-affirmative-task-before-us-is-to-create-a-new-world-order/

For media inquiries, contact nicholasballasy@gmail.com - http://www.nickballasy.com

It is incumbent upon us to recognize that socialists in American politics (mostly Democrats and especially the Democratic Socialists of America, the dominant group of Democrats in Congress) have always wanted to surrender American sovereignty to a One World Government, and as far as the United States of America goes that means abandoning our U.S. Constitution and along with it, The Bill of Rights. The last 10 years have seen much accomplished to that end. The 1st Amendment of the Constitution that guarantees U.S. citizens Freedom of Speech, the 2nd Amendment that guarantees U.S. citizens the Right To Bear Arms, the 4th Amendment that protects our homes against unreasonable searches and seizures, have all come under attack from our Democrat-controlled government. Now we have Barack Hussein Obama about to sign the United Nations treaty to Control Small Arms, which if passed by the Senate, will destroy our citizens the Right To Bear Arms, the only protection we have to defend against government tyranny. What is the New World Order that conservatives have been warning about for more than 50 years? Start with this lengthy explanation from Wikipedia. One thing now is that it isn't a conspiracy any more when the Vice President of the United States calls for it.

New World Order (conspiracy theory)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As a conspiracy theory, the term New World Order or NWO refers to the emergence of a totalitarian one-world government.^{[2][3][4][5][6]}

The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government—which replaces sovereign nation-states—and an all-encompassing propaganda that ideologizes its establishment as the culmination of history's progress. Significant occurrences in politics and finance are speculated to be orchestrated by an unduly influential cabal operating through many front organizations. Numerous historical and current events are seen as steps in an on-going plot to achieve world domination through secret political gatherings and decision-making processes.^{[2][3][4][5][6]}

Prior to the early 1990s, New World Order conspiracism was limited to two American countercultures, primarily the militantly anti-government right, and secondarily fundamentalist Christians concerned with end-time emergence of the Antichrist.^[7] Skeptics, such as Michael Barkun and Chip Berlet, have observed that right-wing populist conspiracy theories about a New World Order have now not only been embraced by many seekers of stigmatized knowledge but have seeped into popular culture, thereby inaugurating an unrivaled period of people actively preparing for apocalyptic millenarian scenarios in the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.^[3][5] These political scientists are concerned that this mass hysteria could have what they judge to be devastating effects on American political life, ranging from widespread political alienation to escalating lone-wolf terrorism.^[3][5]

History of the term

During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II. They all saw these periods as opportunities to implement idealistic proposals for global governance in the sense of new collective efforts to address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve, while always respecting the right of nations to self-determination. These proposals led to the creation of international organizations, such as the United Nations and NATO, and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power in favor of the United States as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism. These creations in particular and liberal internationalism in general, however, would always be criticized and opposed by American ultraconservative business nationalists from the 1930s on.^[8]

Progressives welcomed these new international organizations and regimes in the aftermath of the two World Wars, but argued they suffered from a democratic deficit and therefore were inadequate to not only prevent another global war but also foster global justice. The United Nations was designed in 1945 by U.S. bankers and State Department planners, and was always intended to remain a free association of sovereign nation-states, not a transition to democratic world government. Thus, activists around the globe formed a world federalist movement hoping in vain to create a "real" new world order.^[9]

British writer and futurist H. G. Wells would go further than progressives in the 1940s by appropriating and redefining the term "new world order" as a synonym for the establishment of a technocratic world state and planned economy.^[10] Despite the popularity of his ideas in some state socialist circles, Wells failed to exert a deeper and more lasting influence because he was unable to concentrate his energies on a direct appeal to intelligentsias who would, ultimately, have to coordinate a Wellsian new world order.^[11]

During the Red Scare of 1947–1957, agitators of the American secular and Christian right, influenced by the work of Canadian conspiracy theorist William Guy Carr, increasingly embraced and spread unfounded fears of Freemasons, Illuminati, and Jews being the driving force behind an "international communist conspiracy". The threat of "Godless communism" in the form of a state atheistic and bureaucratic collectivist world government, demonized as a "Red Menace", therefore became the main focus of apocalyptic millenarian conspiracism. The Red Scare would shape one of the core ideas of the political right in the United States which is that liberals and progressives with their welfare-state policies and international cooperation programs such as foreign aid supposedly contribute to a gradual process of collectivism that will inevitably lead to nations being replaced with a communist one-world government.^[12]

Right-wing populist advocacy groups with a producerist worldview, such as the John Birch Society, disseminated a multitude of conspiracy theories in the 1960s claiming that the governments of both the United States and the Soviet Union were controlled by a cabal of corporate internationalists, greedy bankers and corrupt politicians intent on using the United Nations as the vehicle to create the "One World Government". This right-wing anti-globalist conspiracism would fuel the Bircher campaign for U.S. withdrawal from the U.N.. American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966 booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy to the creation of the U.S. Federal Reserve System in 1913 by international bankers, who she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 as the shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, "international bankers" would have been interpreted by many readers as a reference to a postulated "international Jewish banking conspiracy" masterminded by the Rothschilds.^[12]

Claiming that the term "New World Order" is used by a secretive elite dedicated to the destruction of all national sovereignties, American writer Gary Allen, in his 1971 book None Dare Call It Conspiracy, 1974 book Rockefeller: Campaigning for the New World Order and 1987 book Say "No!" to the New World Order, articulated the anti-globalist theme of much current right-wing populist conspiracism in the U.S.. Thus, after the fall of communism in the early 1990s, the main demonized scapegoat of the American far right shifted seamlessly from crypto-communists who plotted on behalf of the Red Menace to globalists who plot on behalf of the New World Order. The relatively painless nature of the shift was due to growing right-wing populist opposition to corporate internationalism but also in part to the basic underlying apocalyptic millenarian paradigm, which fed the Cold War and the witch-hunts of the McCarthy period.^[12]

Is feigning ignorance and begging forgiveness a legal defense for Treason?

In 1972, at the height of the Vietnam War that cost the lives of 58,220 U.S. service members, a war that was dismally orchestrated by the liberals in the State Dept., actress Jane Fonda went on her infamous visit to the heart of enemy territory, Hanoi, North Vietnam, to protest America's involvement. Fonda made anti-war speeches and posed for pictures of herself sitting on an anti-aircraft cannon smiling and singing songs with North Vietnamese soldiers. Jane Fonda committed Treason against the United States by giving aid and comfort to the enemy but because of the influence of the leftist news media, Hollywood liberals and sympathetic Democrats, she was never charged or put on trial for the offense that carries the death penalty. From that day forward Jane Fonda has been known as Hanoi Jane.

In a 60 Minutes interview on March 31, 2005, Fonda reiterated that she had no regrets about her trip to North Vietnam in 1972, with the exception of the anti-aircraft-gun photo. The following year, Jane Fonda married her second husband, Tom Hayden who was one of the initiators of the influential leftist student activist group Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) a Communist front group. According to Wikipedia,

In 1965, Tom Hayden, along with Communist Party USA (CPUSA) member Herbert Aptheker and Quaker peace activist Staughton Lynd undertook a controversial visit to North Vietnam and Hanoi. The three toured villages and factories and met with an American POW whose plane had been shot down. The result of this tour of North Vietnam, at a high point in the war, was a book titled The Other Side. Staughton Lynd later wrote that the New Left disavowed "the Anti-Communism of the previous generation" and that Lynd and Hayden had written in Studies on the Left that, "We refuse to be anti-Communist, We insist the term has lost all the specific content it once had."

Tom Hayden made several other well-publicized visits to North Vietnam as well as Cambodia during America's involvement in the Vietnam War, including an especially controversial one during 1972 to North Vietnam with his future wife, actress Jane Fonda. The next year he married Fonda and they had one child, Troy Garity, born on 7 July 1973. In 1974, while the Vietnam War was still ongoing, the documentary Introduction to the Enemy was released, a collaboration by Jane Fonda, Tom Hayden, Haskell Wexler, among others. It depicts their travels through North and South Vietnam in the spring of 1974.

Her treasonous actions did little to halt her Hollywood career and Jane Fonda went on to enjoy the financial benefits of her films and speaking tours. But in an interview on the Oprah Winfrey Network a few days ago, she feigned ignorance and sorrow for the photo session in Hanoi. “I made one unforgivable mistake when I was in North Vietnam, and I will go to my grave with this,” Jane Fonda says on the Oprah Winfrey Network. Just as every young woman realized her great mistake posing for a slanderous sex photo, but not for engaging in the salacious activity itself, Jane Fonda Fonda said she knew immediately that she had made a mistake when they started taking pictures and has apologized repeatedly, both privately and publicly. Newmax reported the exchange of the interview:

As everyone was laughing and singing, Fonda was led to a gun site, where she sat down.

“And I was laughing and clapping, and there were pictures taken."

As she walked away, Fonda says she suddenly realized that the pictures would be seen in the United States — and they would not look good.

“There were no planes, the gun was not operable. It didn’t matter. This is an image that belied everything that I was,” Fonda said.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Jane-Fonda-Unforgivable-Mistake/2013/04/03/id/497721?s=al&promo_code=13058-1#ixzz2PVQ5FSaR

It is of little comfort to the thousands of American soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice for their country and the thousands more who returned home to be tormented by the anti-war climate that made them not the heroes they should have been but the villains. As they were depicted by another soldier named John Kerry who catapulted his military service into testimony before the liberal Democrat controlled Senate Foreign Relations Committee. A career that has resulted in his affirmation as our Secretary of State. There is no statute of limitation on the crime of Treason. As I wrote here a few months ago:

Sunday, December 2, 2012

The art of distraction, keeping the spotlight off Sen. John Kerry and his quest for Secretary of State.

It is somewhat incongruous to realize that today, Sen. John Kerry occupies the position of Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the very body that launched his political career in 1971.

John Kerry's political career was launched in the U.S. Senate in the Committee on Foreign Relations on April 22, 1971 when he was invited to appear as a representative of the left wing group Vietnam Veterans Against the War. The testimony Kerry gave accused his fellow American troops of blatantly committing war crimes against the civilian population of Vietnam. He was congratulated for his work by leading liberals on the Senate committee. 

Birds of a feather do flock together.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.

 

Democrats pushing new law to legitimize and protect pedophiles.

It began with the Hate Crimes Act of 2009 when Florida Democrat Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL), made his startling revelation about pedophiles. When confronted with a list of 547 paraphilias from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, including pedophilia, he declared that “all of these philias and fetishes and isms that were put forward – need not live in fear because of who they are.”  

Now we have today another Democrat, California Congresswoman, Rep. Jackie Speier CA (D), who wants to federalize a state law to prohibit counseling to change a person’s sexual orientation. But there is a problem with the language of her bill. It legitimizes pedophilia.

The web site Rethink Society carries this explanation.

In regards to California state law SB 1172, which was initiated to ban conversion therapy in California, there were questions regarding the text of the bill.

“This language is so broad and vague, it arguably could include all forms of sexual orientation, including pedophilia,” said Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute. “It’s not just the orientation that is protected—the conduct associated with the orientation is protected as well.”

Who Cares If Pedophilia Is A Sexual Orientation?

It also means that, if pedophilia is a sexual orientation, that discrimination laws also apply to pedophiles. That means you cannot block a pedophile from being a preschool teacher or any other high-risk occupation.

Recently, a United States District Court Judge, William Shubb, sided with Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) by granting their plaintiffs a preliminary injunction against the legislation, which is known as California SB 1172.

“Because the court finds that SB 1172 is subject to strict scrutiny and is unlikely to satisfy this standard, the court finds that plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims based on violations of their rights to freedom of speech under the First Amendment,” wrote Judge Shubb.

“This victory sends a clear signal to all those who feel they can stifle religious freedom, free speech, and the rights of parents without being contested,” said PJI President, Brad Dacus. “We at PJI are ready to fight this battle all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary.

“This will be a long, grueling battle with tremendous consequences for generations to come. We are grateful to those who are willing to support us in this critical time to preserve our freedoms and protect our children,” he continued.

Thankfully, for the time being, this legislation has been blocked, but many questions still remain.

This bill establishes a dangerous precedent for normalizing the behavior of pedophiles while stripping parents of their rights and peace of mind.

One can certainly make the argument that homosexuals are “born that way,” and we generally would not dispute that. However, when we have legislators that are, by default, leaving the door open to extend the “born that way” defense to pedophiles, this crosses a very dangerous line.

Whether a pedophile is born that way or not, it still does not make their behavior acceptable in any way.

If so, then you could declare rapists are “born that way.” They can’t help that they need to rape! Poor them!

Let’s be real.

Sex between an adult and a child too young to understand what is going on is not the same thing as sex between two consenting adults.

The operative word here is “consenting.” Children—by both law and basic common sense—cannot “consent.”

Here is how the problem began with the Democrats holding a solid majority in both houses of Congress in 2009 and Barack Hussein Obama creating his Czars to rule America. As I wrote in December 2009,

An open letter to the group "Mom's Like Me" and parents everywhere.

Among the many radical extremists Barack Hussein Obama has appointed to be his Czars is one Kevin Jennings who founded the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/home/index.html. Documented evidence has been discovered that shows Kevin Jennings’ group the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) has been promoting deviant sex to school kids aged 14 and even younger in various courses. I strongly suggest that anyone concerned about this investigate the links below and see the proof and the extent of deviant material being distributed through schools. I must warn you some of these links contain transcripts and copies of the actual material produced by GLSEN and are EXTREMELY GRAPHIC. 

Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings was the founder, and for many years, Executive Director of an organization called the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. GLSEN started essentially as Jennings’ personal project and grew to become the culmination of his life’s work. And he was chosen by President Obama to be the nation’s Safe Schools Czar http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osdfs/index.html  primarily *because* he had founded and led GLSEN (scroll for bio)   http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2009/05/05192009d.html

Following the passage of the original Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HR 1913) in the House of Representatives, a storm of protest caused the U.S. Senate to delay a vote because it would not have passed. But a Democrat took the House bill and added it to a National Defense Authorization Act as an amendment and it was passed on July 23, 2009 and signed into law. Conservative groups across America waged a tremendous battle to stop this bill. I wrote about it here.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

This is what happens when the Democrats legitimized pedophilia.

Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL), when confronted with a list of 547 paraphilias from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, including pedophilia, he declared that “all of these philias and fetishes and isms that were put forward – need not live in fear because of who they are.”

A recent story hit the news about a Macy's store clerk who was fired from her job because she refused to let a man dressed as a woman from entering the women's fitting room. Seems that Macy's has adopted a policy that permits a zero tolerance against discriminating against any form of perversion directed at the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender (LGBT) community.

            Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman
            Liberty Counsel

“Excuse, me, but men cannot use the women’s fitting room. The women’s fitting room is for women only.” That’s what Natalie Johnson politely told a young man wearing lipstick who entered the women’s fitting room and undressed. And for that, Macy’s fired her because the store’s absurd policy actually allows men to use the women’s fitting room. Liberty Counsel is now helping Natalie get her job back, and even more importantly, we’re asking Macy’s to change this ridiculous policy that places women at risk. Please read my important update on this fast-developing story below – Mat.

Natalie Johnson’s story is generating international news coverage and drawing widespread attention to Macy’s dangerous “Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender (LGBT) policy.”

When Natalie politely told the cross-dressing young man he could not use the women’s fitting room, he and the attorney with him said that Macy’s is “LGBT friendly” and began shouting expletives. Then they demanded to see Natalie’s supervisor.

Natalie’s stand and subsequent dismissal have become international news. Most media outlets are characterizing it as yet another example of the escalating aggressiveness of radical LGBT activists who deceitfully call their disruptive actions a “civil rights” struggle.

Not enough people paid attention when Congress passed Sen. Ted Kennedy’s Hate Crimes Prevention Act in 2009. This new law gave legitimate, Federally protected status for every conceivable form of sexual deviancy known and has spawned a continuous downward spiral of morality in America. 

Now, in an article written by Dr. Keith Ablow on Fox News, Paving the Way for Condoning Child Rape, this doctor writes;

“But, now, there should be no doubt that our culture is poised to begin embracing pedophilia as a lifestyle choice, just like homosexuality. A group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals called B4U-Act, which has representatives from Harvard and Johns Hopkins, gathered recently in Baltimore to organize their push to change the negative perception of pedophiles and encourage them to get help in a nonjudgmental environment.”

Few people realize that the homosexual lifestyle itself, of which pedophilia is often associated, was always considered a mental disorder until the American Psychiatric Association (APA) voted to change it. In the early 1970s, activists campaigned against the APA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders classification of homosexuality as a mental disorder, protesting at APA offices and at annual meetings from 1970 to 1973. In 1973 the Board of Trustees voted to remove homosexuality as a disorder category from the DSM, a decision ratified by a majority (58%) of the general APA membership the following year.

Conservative groups waged a tremendous battle in the Spring of 2009 against a new law they had called The Pedophile Protection Act which gave official Federal recognition to every deviant lifestyle. The American Family Association said since "sexual orientation" nowhere is defined in the law, "this law will give pedophiles, voyeurs, and exhibitionists special protections, which is why the bill has correctly been called 'The Pedophile Protection Act.'"

In the House version, an effort to amend the bill to exclude “pedophilia” from the Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HR 1913) was defeated in committee along party lines. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL), when confronted with a list of 547 paraphilias from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, including pedophilia, he declared that “all of these philias and fetishes and isms that were put forward – need not live in fear because of who they are.”

Following the passage of the original Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HR 1913) a storm of protest caused the U.S. Senate to delay a vote because it would not have passed. But a Democrat took the House bill and added it to a National Defense Authorization Act as an amendment and it was passed on July 23, 2009 and signed into law.

No one should be surprised that the ugly face of pedophilia is rising to a legitimate status. It has always been around. One investigation into the Catholic Church pedophile priest cases mentioned that one of the priests had actually been a member of NAMBLA. An article in Wikipedia documents the history of The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).  NAMBLA is a pedophile and pederasty advocacy organization in the United States that works to abolish age of consent laws criminalizing adult sexual contact with minors, and for the release of all men who have been jailed for sexual contacts with minors that did not involve coercion.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.