Is Obama planning to rule America in exile?

There have been different versions of this story in the last few days but none of the stories have contradicted anything mentioned in any other story, they simply leave different parts of it out. Barack Hussein Obama is taking a really huge contingent of politicians and staff workers out of the country on a 10-day trip to India, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea. He has over 500 security personnel on the ground in India making arrangements. He has taken over an entire hotel with over 800 rooms. He has a fleet of 40 armored limousines along with private aircraft and an entire aircraft carrier task force of 34 ships for protection. Apart from the astronomical cost of this extravagant trip,  since it must have been planned before the elections and the Democrats knew well in advance they were going to pay for their two year long power trip, this whole thing has taken on the appearance of a government in exile. While that point of view is more fantasy that reality, recent statements from Islamic leaders in Pakistan, the arch-enemy of India, calling upon Obama to proclaim himself leader of the Muslim world most likely explain the real reason for the extraordinary level of protection.

WorldNet Daily News  reported on Sept. 9th "Ayatullah Durrani wants U.S. President Barack Obama to take his place as a Caliph,” or ruler, of the Islamic nation. “The coming Eid would expectedly be observed on 9/11; this a golden opportunity for President Obama to offer Eid prayers at Ground Zero and become Amir-ul-Momineen or Caliph of Muslims. In this way, all the problems of Muslim World would be solved,” stated Minister of State for Industries and Productions Ayatullah Durrani, according to Pakistan’s The Nation newspaper. The newspaper reported Durrani called its offices and argued the Muslim world was in “dire need” of a supreme leader and that the position would earn Obama the exemplary titles of what Durrani termed “Mullah Barrack Hussain (sic) Obama,” or “Allama Obama.”

India, is well aware of Obama's connection with the Muslim world and has its own history with the millions of Hindu's slaughtered by Muslims in the past. So it stands to reason that India would be a logical place to find any number of people who would like to plan an attack on him. Two years ago a band of Muslim terrorists invaded a hotel in Mumbai, India and massacred 160 civilians.

Minnesota Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann spoke to Newsmax about Obama's trip and revealed a few other details of the level of protection being taken.

 Obama leaves Friday on a trip that begins in India and will also take him to Indonesia, South Korea and Japan. Reports are circulating that the president and his entourage of about 3,000 officials, business people, journalists, and security personnel will spend some $200 million a day during his 4-day visit to India, which would put the tab for the entire trip well over $1 billion.

“We have never seen this sort of an entourage going with the president before,” Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann told CNN’s Anderson Cooper in an interview that aired on Wednesday.

The mainstream leftist news media made a lot out of the story yesterday about Barack Hussein Obama's conciliatory statement on the election results and his willingness to work with the Republican leadership in the House. Obama must be practicing Taqiyya, the Islamic strategy of lying to further the interests of Islam, or do the Democrats practice the same thing, too? -  when he says things like that to his liberal allies in the media. Then, just as Islamic leaders do elsewhere, he goes and says something completely different to some other group. Here is another story out of Newsmax.

Obama Tells Left-Wing MoveOn: I Will Fight GOP

Thursday, 04 Nov 2010 04:14 PM 

President Barack Obama may have expressed humility during his conciliatory news conference Wednesday over the shellacking he took in the midterm elections, but just hours after speaking to the nation, he made it very clear in a phone call to left-leaning activist group MoveOn that he is not willing to compromise his core beliefs.

“We always knew bringing about change in Washington wouldn’t be easy, and it might get tougher in the days ahead,” Obama told the liberal organization's supporters a day after Republicans won the House in a landslide. “The message I took away from the elections is very simple: The American people are still frustrated. They still want change; we just have to work harder to deliver the change the American people want.”

Obama said he and activist organizations like MoveOn must work harder pushing the progressive agenda “until every American sees real change in their own lives . . . We didn’t sign up for doing what was easy, we signed up for doing what was right,” he said of his policies to fix America. “We are going to continue to take all the time it takes –– and all the effort it takes –– to get our country back on track.”

Finally, a comment on one thing Obama said in his so-called "conciliatory" speech about the elections. Keep in mind that as much as so many Americans despise Barack Hussein Obama for his Marxist/Socialist platform and his association with communist groups and terrorists such as Bill Ayers and Bernadette Dorhn, Obama is still a highly educated person. So why does a person who once gave lectures on Constitutional Law fail to understand the differences between "rights" and "privileges" that every  American seems to know about? During that speech on the results of Tuesday's elections, Barack Hussein Obama said that America has just exercised a "privilege"  to go out and vote. That is not the way MY country was formed. Maybe Obama would like the masses to think if voting is a "privilege" then maybe that "privilege" can be taken away from you.

On another web site called Sheikyermami someone said: "It is very important that you understand the difference between a “right” to vote, which you exercise, and the “privilege” that Hussein Obama would like to regulate.  Hey, he chose the word, he is a lawyer educated at Harvard, and a “law professor” (actually, he was a “lecturer,”  who taught Alinsky style subversion, and there is a very large difference between professor and lecturer) at the University of Chicago, a reputable institution at one time. It is the difference between a camel and a rolls royce."

"There are no accidents in choosing between the words “right” and “privilege,” so I have to conclude he meant precisely as he said, precisely as he read from his prepared remarks.  It is best you understand the difference, clearly. 

It is also the difference between a citizen and a subject. Citizens have rights while subjects only enjoy privileges. We all know the famous words "We are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights..." Three times in recent months Obama has used that line but in each reference to it he has deleted the part about our being "endowed by our Creator". Is this because Obama most likely considers himself as royalty and every American as being his subjects?