Sunday, June 30, 2013

Moving from 1st place to 2nd place to 3rd place to ZERO, how disappointed Republicans deal with their political remorse.

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has been my hero since the day she was chosen to run for Vice-President on the Republican Party ticket in 2008. Sarah Palin has always epitomized the strong, patriotic female conservative with her Mama Grizzly and Lipstick on a Pit Bull attitude. Now I suspect she is about to consider the biggest mistake of her life and I am afraid a great number of her loyal fans will follow her. Jeff Poor wrote yesterday on The Daily Caller, "Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican nominee for vice president responded to a Fox News Channel viewer’s Twitter question Saturday about the possibility of her and conservative talker Mark Levin abandoning the Republican Party and creating something called the “Freedom Party.”

When true Republicans stand fast on the traditional principles of their party they win elections. Unfortunately, there are too many Republicans In Name Only (RINOs) who have managed to destroy the image we represent. It was no coincidence that Sarah Palin was chosen to run along side one of the party's biggest RINOs, Arizona Senator John McCain. Without Sarah Palin on the ticket, I and a whole lot of other conservative Republicans would have probably stayed home on election day in 2008. This is not the first time that a strong liberal influence has taken hold of the Republican Party. I was there in New York when the state Republican Party was dominated by ultra liberals Nelson Rockefeller and Jacob Javits. In fact, what the conservative Republicans did then in the early 1960s is just what Sarah Palin is thinking of doing now. Abandoning the Republican Party and creating a new political party. Sarah Palin is calling her party The Freedom Party, the disenfranchised Republicans in New York called their new party The Conservative Party.
If history has a way of repeating itself, Sarah Palin's Freedom Party will become relegated to a distant 3rd or 4th place in the national political power base. The New York State Conservative Party was only successful in electing one candidate to a national office in the last 50 years and that was James Buckley who became a one term U.S. Senator. James Buckley was the brother of noted columnist William F. Buckley and shared his notoriety. From the inception of the Conservative Party their greatest influence was in cross-endorsing a handful of conservative Republicans in local elections. Their one-time success at cross-endorsement was when they helped elect Republican Alfonse D'Amato to the Senate (also for one term) but on the national level there are only 8 states that allow fusion tickets combining vote tallies from more than one line: Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, New York, Oregon, South Carolina and Vermont.

Wikipedia has a rather complete story about the history of the New York State Conservative Party. 
The Conservative Party of New York State is a political party in the United States active in the state of New York, holding "Line C" on ballots directly below the Democratic and Republican parties. It only operates in New York State, and is not part of any larger party.
In New York State's elections, the Conservative Party is ranked fourth place in terms of membership, behind only the Democrats, Republicans, and the Independence Party, but ahead of the Greens and Constitution Parties.[1] As of November 1, 2011, a total of 147,993 voters, or 1.3% of New York State's total enrollment, are registered with the party.[2]


Electoral History of the Conservative Party of New York State
The Conservative Party of New York State was founded in 1962 by a group including J. Daniel Mahoney, Kieran O'Doherty, Charles E. Rice, and Charles Edison, out of frustration with the perceived liberalism of the state's Republican Party. A key consideration was New York's fusion voting, unusual among US states, which allows individual candidates to receive votes from more than one party. The Liberal Party of New York, founded in 1944, had earlier benefitted from this system.

The Conservative Party founders wanted to balance the Liberal Party's influence. One early supporter was National Review founder William F. Buckley, who was the party's candidate for mayor of New York City in 1965. In 1970, his brother James Buckley was elected to the U.S. Senate as a Conservative Party candidate; in 1976, he ran for reelection as a candidate of the Republican and Conservative Parties, losing to Daniel Patrick Moynihan. In the 2004 U.S. Senate election, the Conservative Party endorsed Marilyn O'Grady to oppose Republican candidate Howard Mills and incumbent Democratic Senator Charles Schumer.
My strongest advice to Sarah Palin is in the words of someone she may admire: "You don't change horses in the middle of the stream." And it comes from the mouth of the most famous Republican of all, Abraham Lincoln. From an 1864 speech by Abraham Lincoln, in reply to Delegation from the National Union League who were urging him to be their presidential candidate. 'An old Dutch farmer, who remarked to a companion once that it was not best to swap horses when crossing streams."

As far as national politics goes, third party movements only manage to split the conservative vote. Put a Democrat on the ballot against a Republican and a Third Party candidate and if the third party candidate is a conservative, the Democrat usually wins. The only recognizable third party we have today is the Libertarian Party but in spite of their conservative leanings, they seem to have been created for the sole purpose of legalizing marijuana. The Libertarian Party has virtually no international platform and wants a whole slew of state and federal laws repealed to prohibit one activity or another. In several noted examples, when a Libertarian Party candidate ran in a local election the Democrat always won and usually the votes gathered between the Republican and the Libertarian was greater than what the Democrat had received. A few noteworthy Libertarians such as U.S. Senator Rand Paul and Congressman Thomas Massie won their elections in Kentucky by running on the Republican Party ticket. And that is the only way to win.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

In defense of Paula Deen, I ask everyone: "How many times have you used the word 'Nigger'?

I don't watch Paula Deen's cooking show, I don't have any of her cookbooks and I am not one of her fans. But I am a big supporter of Freedom of Speech and Justice and happen to disagree with the way she has been destroyed by a hypocritical bunch of Politically Correct liberal snobs. Paula Deen lost her famous cooking show and most of her endorsements all because she admitted in a sworn deposition that she once used the word Nigger many years ago. And the story behind that is worthy of more than a brief mention. But those hypocritical snobs haven't been reminding us of the details. Before Paula Deen became noted as a culinary expert on Southern Cooking, she worked as a bank teller when she was a young woman. One day a Black man came into her bank and waved a gun in her face and robbed the bank. She went home and told a family member what happened and in her terrified state she referred to the bank robber as a Nigger. And then recently she responded truthfully when she was asked.

How many of us have had less traumatic experiences with Black people and used the same language? Do you recall back in the 1960s we had widespread rioting in our streets. It was the starting point of the Civil Rights Movement. Sure, most or all of the riots were caused by a communist revolution in our streets but it was also a turbulent time that saw the launching points for the careers of Malcolm X, The Black Panthers and the The Nation of Islam. And we watched it all from the relative safety of our living rooms on national television. Did any of us curse these hoodlums and would-be terrorists as Niggers in the heat of passion? 

That was then and this is now and most of the white people in America today, with the exception of the Democratic Party inspired Klu Klux Klan, or the White Supremacist Aryan Brotherhood, use that kind of language any more. So does that make any of us a racist? No, it does not. Matter of fact I pride myself in my friendship with several Black conservatives who stand up and fight for America.

Just as Jesus once said, 'Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.'

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.
According to a story on Paula Deen voted for and supported Barack Hussein Obama. They wrote: "Deen, who campaigned for President Obama in 2008 and cooked alongside Michelle Obama on national TV, was ranked as the fourth highest-earning celebrity chef in 2012. She’s now under fire for admitting in a legal deposition to use of the “N”-word many years ago." I do NOT agree with Paula Deen's politics but she was still railroaded by some personal comments made scores of years ago and that is wrong.
Also, another liberal Democrat named Alec Baldwin seems to be getting a free pass from his fellow liberals for making several spurious attacks against a known homosexual writing on Twitter “I’m going to find you, George Stark, you toxic little queen, and I’m gonna f--k…you…up” is an “alleged slur?” and following that with “If [sic] put my foot up your f--king ass, George Stark, but I’m sure you’d dig it too much?"
So, as Noel Sheppard wrote on Newsbusters "It was a metaphysical certitude that liberal media members were going to once again show their hypocritical colors and defend Alec Baldwin’s homophobic attack on a British reporter Thursday.

"ABC’s David Muir came through for the high-strung actor on Saturday’s World News actually calling the attack an “alleged slur” (video follows with transcript and commentary):"

But that is what liberal do. The named are all interchangeable: Liberal, Democrat, Hypocrite.


Friday, June 28, 2013

Daily Sanity: Another IRS scandal - Where does it stop? IRS scandals are hurting Americans

DailySanity Newsletter from


Where does it stop? IRS scandals are hurting Americans 

Mr. Chairman, on the advice of my counsel, I respectfully decline to answer any questions and invoke my Fifth Amendment privilege to remain silent.”
Who is Gregory Roseman and why is he important?
Roseman “is or was” (doesn’t mean he was fired) a deputy director of acquisitions at the Internal Revenue Service. He’s accused of helping a friend get dozens of contacts through IRS procurement potentially worth HALF A BILLION DOLLARS of the People’s money.
The Inspector General’s report alleged Roseman’s “cozy relationship” with Strong Castle Inc., and with the President Braulio Castillo was much more “friendly” than he told the committee. Castillo had denied that he had any kind of personal relationship with IRS officials, but it didn’t take an investigation long to refute his story:
  • More than 350 messages between the two men included inappropriate homophobic slurs, offensive jokes, and comments about the appearance of other IRS.
  • Months of records for text messages at “contract junctures” were accidentally deleted according to Castillo.
  • It was reported that Castillo even asked his IRS friend for help in “structuring a deal” to set up a new company that would focus on selling technology to the IRS.
Castillo was also questioned by the committee for “earning” Veterans disability payments for a foot injury received, not in combat, but while playing football at a military prep school, aka high school! Castillo went on to play college football at the University of San Diego, and then more than 20 years later, he APPLIED for and RECIEVED Veterans disability payments!
In an intense exchange during the hearing, Rep. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., a decorated Iraq war veteran and who lost both her legs in combat, noted that Castillo's application for veterans benefits allowed him to promote Strong Castle as a small business operated by a disabled veteran.
"My feet hurt too," Duckworth said, "In fact, the balls of my feet hurt continuously…” Duckworth asked Castillo how severe his injury was rated by the VA.
After Castillo said his sore ankle was rated at 30 percent, Duckworth pointed to her own arm. "My right arm was essentially blown off and reattached ... and I'm still in danger of losing my arm. I can't feel my arm. My disability rating for that arm is 20 percent," Duckworth said.
"I don't set the ratings," Castillo replied.
While plagued with scandals, the IRS also unjustly targeted Conservatives, Tea Party Americans and intimidated groups applying for tax exemption. Now we see how the IRS treats their FRIENDS as compared to average Americans! The Internal Revenue Service awarded contracts to Strong Castle Inc., an information technology firm in Leesburg, Virginia solely on the relationship between Castillo and Roseman, the panel’s report stated. 
We need a special prosecutor to expose and stop it all!
If, we the people, make a simple math error on a tax form, we are guilty until innocent, but the IRS agents stealing the people’s money are considered innocent until proven guilty?
Don’t wait for someone else to speak up…today’s the day we all say NO MORE!
Everyone can see this is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the latest government scandals.  How BIG is the iceberg? 
An independent prosecutor must be appointed by Congress for the IRS!
The Internal Revenue Service just revealed that over $50 million has been used by employees (many having IRS credit cards!) on employee conferences!
Wealthy and well-connected FRIENDS of the IRS are being awarded lucrative contracts.  Now, the report reveals that IRS employees used credit cards for their own personal items!  Just the tip of an iceberg?
  • $2,655 were spent on diet pills, romance novels, steaks, a smartphone and baby-related items, including bottles, games and clothes…
  • $418 for novelty decorations and swag at managers’ meetings, including kazoos, bathtub toys and “Thomas the Tank Engine” wristbands
  • $3,152 to rent a popcorn machine and buy prizes for an employee event, including bandanas, stuffed animals, sunglasses and stovepipe hats.
  • Purchase of 28 bottles of wine for 41 guests in attendance at an international event.
That’s not all, here’s an ARMAGEDDON SIZED KICKER!
  • Two IRS credit cards were used to buy online pornography!
It’s easy, just click and tell Congress you are not going watch your money disappear on corruption while President Obama is raising taxes to spend more of your hard earned money on another too big, too wasteful, too corrupt government bureaucracy for healthcare!
Join the conversation on Facebook
Joe Otto
P.S. Tell Your Friends!
Share this on Facebook  Share this on Twitter
Make sure your friends read this too...we need every voice we can get to change the status quo in Washington! Forward this to a friend »

Conservative Daily is a media outlet protected by the first amendment and support for our efforts is not tax-deductible.
Shuffling Madness Media, 10750 Pine Drive, Parker, CO 80134
Copyright 2013 Shuffling Madness Media. All rights reserved.

Thursday, June 27, 2013

FBI pulls 'Faces of Global Terrorism' bus ads after receiving complaints.

FBI Pulls ‘Faces of Global Terrorism’ Bus Ads

The FBI has taken down its Seattle-area bus ads featuring the “Faces of Global Terrorism” after receiving complaints, including from one member of Congress, that the ads stereotype Muslims.

Last week, Washington congressman Jim McDermott (D) wrote a letter to FBI director Robert Mueller, saying the ads “only serve to exacerbate the disturbing trend against Middle Eastern, South Asian and Muslim-Americans.” ”When you start saying that this is the face of terrorism, you are really stigmatizing a whole group of people,” he added.

According to the Seattle Times, King County Metro, the city’s transit authority, had received six complaints about the ads. An FBI spokesperson said the decision to remove all 46 ads was because of “the feedback we are getting.”

The FBI pointed out that the ads show terrorists from all over the world, including from African countries, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Chechnya; and three were born in the U.S. McDermott countered that it is hard to distinguish the faces as the buses drive by.

Jeff Siddiqui, the founder of American Muslims of Puget Sound, applauded the FBI’s decision to pull the ads. He said that his organization could now “rebuild a relationship” with the agency. “Please God, let it be a relationship of open communication and trust.”

The ads will be taken down in the next seven to ten days.


Wonder if this tactic would work on those wanted posters in the Post Office? Just get some friends to file complaints.

Bare Naked Islam has a different take on this:

SEATTLE: Left wing media want to know if this FBI-sponsored ad campaign on Global Terrorism is ‘racist?’

Apparently the moonbats are ignorant of the fact that Islam is not a race. The fact that the photos on this sign showing Faces of Global Terrorism are ALL Muslims, is not racist, Islamophobic, or xenophobic. It is the truth…something the mainstream media have a problem using in their stories about Muslims.

Seattle Weekly  In a letter to the FBI requesting they pull the campaign from Seattle buses, U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) sounds off on what he says is “offensive to Muslims and ethnic minorities” and “encourages racial and religious profiling.” (Well, DUH, that’s the idea, especially when a $25 million reward is offered!)

The ad shows sixteen faces of wanted terrorists, all of whom appear to be from predominantly Muslim regions. McDermott calls foul, writing that the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list includes people who are not Muslims (but the vast majority ARE)

“The…ad will likely only serve to exacerbate the disturbing trend against Middle Eastern, South Asian and Muslim Americans.” (Ewww, we wouldn’t want to offend Muslim terrorist supporters, now would we?)

The ad is the work of the Puget Sound Joint Terrorism Task Force, and are part of the U.S. Department of State’s Rewards for Justice Program.

As downtown news blog Fifth Avenue Seattle reported on June 4, the program is offering $25 million in rewards for information leading to the terror suspects’ arrests. A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that the ad campaign itself cost $25 million.

We are trying to reach someone with the FBI to get comment on their purported dastardly-ness, but the news release announcing the program put it like this:

“Members of Seattle’s community have time and time again shown themselves to be concerned about protecting their families, their neighbors, and their freedom. Many despicable plots from illicit drug trafficking to violent acts of terrorism have come to the FBI’s attention because vigilant Seattleites came forward with a tip.”



Tuesday, June 25, 2013

I am getting tired of the undeserved honors some conservatives are giving Barack Hussein Obama.

I read several dozen conservative blogs and news sources every day. Some, myself included, often refer to Barack Hussein Obama in uncomplimentary terms such as our Muslim-in-Chief or Communist-mentored Dear Leader (as they call the dictator of North Korea) or even a P.O.S. But many of them continue to heap unintentional praises on Barack Hussein Obama, the very same person they ridicule and condemn, by referring to him as "president". As far as this blogger goes that last sentence is as close as I will ever get to writing the name and the undeserved title in the same sentence.

We all agree that Barack Hussein Obama is the most despicable American politician in history. We all agree that he deserves no honors or platitudes for the things he does and says. So why do so many bloggers and conservative commentators pay homage to this despot by preceding his name with the title "President"? In the context of literal accuracy it should be sufficient to merely write his name "Barack Hussein Obama" when referring to him. Adding the title, for which there is mounting evidence that he does not deserve or is qualified to hold, is both self-defeating and contradictory and sounds like some form of capitulation. 
Is it possible that some of you are guilty of the same Political Correctness that you scorn?
I would love to convince my fellow bloggers to discontinue this practice of using the term "President" until such time as we have a "President" who belongs to America and believes in America. Barack Hussein Obama does neither because he has no love for America or for Americans. He has no love for the Judeo-Christian concepts that led our inspired Founding Fathers to the creation of our once-great nation and our Constitutional Republic. Barack Hussein Obama has often stated his preference for Muslims and Islam which both represent a contradiction to our Constitution and our way of life that embraces God and Freedom and Liberty and our Laws. He deserves nothing more than impeachment and imprisonment and most certainly not some undeserved honor.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.


Sunday, June 23, 2013

Revisiting the history of Democrat coverups of terrorist attacks in America. Adina Kutnicki from Israel lays out their dirty laundry. Dead bodies mean nothing to Democrats.

Yes, Indeed, as Hillary Clinton remarked, "What difference does it make?" when asked about the four dead Americans in Benghazi, Libya. Or even Barry Soetoro //aka// Barack Hussein Obama who never met a Muslim he didn't like and doesn't believe Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan was an Islamic terrorist when he yelled "Allahu Akbar" as he slaughtered unarmed soldiers in Ft. Hood, Texas. Democrats will do anything to get elected or reelected:  Lie, cheat, steal or even cover up the murder of Americans by the enemy of America. Yes, indeed, what difference does it make. Dead bodies mean nothing to Democrats.

Billy Boy Clinton’s Presidency: Marred By Much More Than Diddling An Intern…A Tale of Islamic Jihad Cover Ups…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

What does the Oklahoma City 1995 bombing have in common with TWA Flight 800? More to the point, what don’t they have in common? In fact, both tragedies occurred under Clinton’s Presidency and have proven to be travesties of American injustice. Cover ups galore. Islamic jihad too.
Oh dear, this is so yesteryear, why is this site dredging up old national wounds? Aren’t the dead already buried and shouldn’t we just let them rest in peace? And what about their loved ones and their pain…never mind Bill’s discomfit, Hill’s as well. Again, why the trip down memory lane, isn’t the reign of Obama Inc torturous enough?
Well, as luck would have it – or not, depending on whether the truth is your barometer – this blog has explored the penchant for Demster (throw in an occasional Repub too) cover ups, and the parts played by their media lap dogs. And it is not as if this is “news” herein, but it is highly relevant (satisfying as well) that explosive film footage is now upping the ante. How so?
Yet before we go to this week’s “news”, let us begin at the beginning of said disasters and the media’s complicity factor. Mind you, without a compliant media none of the skeletons stay buried. None at all. As such, when a parroting media ceases their due diligence, all manner of white washes – or in this case, Allah-washing – becomes possible.
Specifically, re Oklahoma City’s 1995 bombing: Most significantly, R. James Woolsey, Director of Central Intelligence,1993-1995 tells a different tale too, diametrically opposed to the media proffered version, a version conjured up by the highest denizens in the Justice Dept. In fact, Woolsey is so convinced of the veracity of his claims, he penned an attribution for the back cover of an explosive book, ‘The Third Terrorist’ ( decrying the official version, dutifully reported by a compliant media! Media digging for facts….. what’s that?
R. James Woolsey, even though a part of the establishment, is first and foremost a patriot.  ”This fascinating product of Jayna Davis’s near-decade of brave, thorough, and dogged investigative reporting effectively shifts the burden of proof to those who would still contend that McVeigh and Nichols executed the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing without the support of a group or groups from the Middle East.”
To make a very long story short, here’s the deal from a few in the know -
Frank J. Gaffney Jr., President of the Center for Security Policy stated ” With the publication of this fascinating account, Jayna Davis will be recognized for what she is: an outstanding journalist willing to risk everything – her career, her financial security, even her life –  to discover and illuminate the facts about foreign complicity in the murderous 1995 bombing in Oklahoma City. Thanks to her book, these facts can no longer be ignored, or concealed. And those who Ms Davis reveals have systematically done both for nearly a decade must be called to account.”
Dr. Constance C. Menges, Former Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and former National Intelligence Officer, CIA contends ”With enormous skill, courage, and persistence, Jayna Davis pursued the foreign terrorist connections to the tragic attack on the federal building in Oklahoma. Now her fast-paced-book reveals the facts that the Clinton administration did not want to confront. This is a must-read for all who want to see beyond the headlines.” Indeed.
And Dan Vogel, FBI Special Agent (retired), former Public Information Officer for Oklahoma City FBI field office added this “This is a must-read for anyone trying to figure out what our government has been doing (or not doing) for the past decade to protect this country from international terrorists. Jayna’s book will chill your blood then make it boil.”
Having spent considerable time researching the above for a related project, it is beyond a shadow of a doubt, what the government purposefully hid from the public – with the aid of a non-inquiring media – led in multiple ways to 9/11/01, though not exclusively so. The point being, keeping facts hidden from the public has deadly consequences, allowing them to operate with their eyes glued shut! -
Yet the cast of characters who covered for wild Bill are still operating, some under the radar, others right inside Obama Inc – recycled garbage-like. Then, as now, the goal of those who shield Islamic terror are of like-mind. Bringing down America – in order to “reshape/transform” her – is part of the global re-ordering -

So what’s the “news”? 


Jack Cashill exposed corruption behind original investigation

Seventeen years after the Paris-bound TWA Flight 800 blew up off the coast of Long Island, producers Tom Stalcup and Kristina Borjesson have released a new documentary –simply titled “TWA Flight 800” – that has the very real potential to re-open the investigation into the plane’s destruction.
Kudos, in particular, to Stalcup. A Ph.D. physicist by background, he has dedicated the last 16 years of his life to exposing what is arguably the most flagrant government cover-up in American peacetime history.
Borjesson has likewise been involved from the beginning. As a producer at CBS in 1996 when TWA 800 was destroyed, she sacrificed her future at CBS to get at the truth. Together, they have produced a documentary that is compelling, convincing and, finally, deeply moving.
Jack Cashill and James Sanders exposed the corrupt TWA 800 investigation in their book “First Strike” — get it now at WND’s Superstore
The producers made two strategic moves to force the media to look seriously at their conclusions. One was to rely heavily on the testimony of a half-dozen highly credible whistleblowers from within the investigation.
The second was to avoid politics. When James Sanders and I produced the video documentary “Silenced” on this subject 12 years ago and the book “First Strike” two years after that, we made the marketing mistake of identifying the logic of the cover-up.
That logic led to the White House. Sixteen years ago, in the home stretch of a difficult re-election campaign, Bill Clinton faced a problem very similar to one that Barack Obama would face in 2012. This is something the media did not want to know, let alone share.
An event took place that threatened the “peace and prosperity” theme of his campaign – specifically, the shoot-down of this doomed airliner with 230 people on board 12 minutes out of JFK.
Although the word was not used back then, the Clinton White House, with the help of a complicit media, rewrote the event’s “narrative” to assure re-election. Again, as with Benghazi, that narrative was clumsily improvised almost on a daily basis.
Knowing the media had his back, Clinton responded much as Obama did: deny, obfuscate and kick the investigatory can down the road until after the election.
One central figure appeared in each drama: Hillary Clinton. She stood by Obama’s side in the Rose Garden on Sept. 12 as he spun reality into confection.
Throughout that long night of July 17, 1996, she holed up with Bill and Sandy Berger in the White House family quarters, assessing their narrative options much as Obama did on Sept. 11, 2012.
By removing politics from the equation, Stalcup, who appeared in “Silenced,” and Borjesson have attracted a fair share of major media attention.
In their well-researched recreation of the plane’s final minutes, they wisely refrain from saying who pulled the trigger. But the evidence that someone fired missiles at the plane overwhelms the dispassionate observer.
Through file footage and commentary, the producers do an unerring job of showing how the forces of government –particularly Jim Kallstrom of the FBI and certain actors at the NTSB – conspired to misdirect the investigation.
The video closes with names and images of those who refused to be interviewed. Several, including Kallstrom, appeared in the video in news footage. The final refusenik is Bill Clinton. He had a lot to hide.
In a confidential taped interview with historian Taylor Branch on Aug. 2, 1996, Clinton laid the blame for TWA 800’s destruction on Iran. “They want war,” he told Branch.
Clinton may or may not have been lying, but he did not want to mess with Iran, at least not right before an election he already had in the bag.
To control the post-crash narrative, the White House allowed the FBI to talk only to The New York Times. Four weeks after the disaster, the Times would report, “Now that investigators say they think the center fuel tank did not explode, they say the only good explanations remaining are that a bomb or a missile brought down the plane.”
A missile attack was too obvious and ominous. So a week later, likely under White House pressure, and without any new evidence, the FBI shifted its storyline fully away from a missile to a bomb.
“Prime Evidence Found That Device Exploded in Cabin of Flight 800,” reported the Times above the fold on Aug. 23, just a few days before the Democratic National Convention.
The Times reached this conclusion by interviewing exactly none of the 270 FBI eyewitnesses to a likely missile strike. Sanders and I interviewed scores of them, as do Stalcup and Borjesson.
But even this scenario threatened the peace and prosperity message to be promoted at the Democratic National Convention just days away. And so the story was allowed to die. For the next three weeks, there was no meaningful reporting at all.
In mid-September, two months after the crash, the FBI shifted the narrative once again from a bomb to a center fuel tank explosion, a possibility that had been ruled out a month earlier. The other media unquestioningly followed the Times. They too had a president to re-elect.
Without ever raising its voice, “TWA Flight 800” makes mincemeat out of the mechanical failure explanation. Stalcup walks the viewer knowingly through one set of evidence after another.
In an emotional sequence towards the documentary’s end, a young female family member of one of the deceased sums up the anguish that she and so many others close to the investigation have felt: “It’s very frustrating that nobody gives a sh** anymore.”
One suspects that Hillary “What difference does it make” Clinton would have only confirmed this woman’s worst suspicions.
Readers, it was not long ago (back in 2005) that this blogger penned an explosive op-ed, ‘The Opening of Jihad On U.S. Soil’, at Israel National News, essentially tying in Billy boy’s Presidency with dereliction of duty regarding Islamic jihad. Its efficacy lies within knowledge gleaned through less than six degrees of separation from original sources- And it is this proximity which renders said claims all the more explosive, even though the opening act of jihad occurred back in 1990. Enough said.
I want to echo one of the comments made by a reader of this commentary on Adina Kutnicki's web site because I have read about this bizarre story in the past. For those who are unfamiliar with this, I suggest you Google the words: "Dead Clinton associates". A few of the more informative compilations with the back stories can be found here:  here: and here:
upaces88 on said:
I am still shocked….I thought I had become numb…I was wrong. I know…well, we all knew… there was more than just a stupid “stain on a dress”….I knew about the “Clinton Corpse List.”
I did NOT know about this.

Friday, June 21, 2013

It's beginning to appear like every bill the Democrats push through Congress is aimed at getting more Democrat voters.

Obamacare Health Care Exchanges are Democrat Party Front Organizations

Think ACORN on steroids.
Check it out:

Now, on to the Investor’s Business Daily. They have an editorial that explains in quite extensive detail how Obamacare is actually a funding operation for Democrat Party operatives and a technique for improving increasing Democrat Party voter registration.
“The Obama administration granted a whopping $910 million to California to set up its insurance exchange. That money is not for bandages, surgery, nurses and doctors to care for the sick. … Shockingly, the $910 million is slated for bureaucracy, including rich compensation packages for exchange employees.” In fact, the executive director of the exchange in California will make $360,000 a year. The exchange money, this $910 million, is being used for computer equipment, public relations, and outreach. 
What is the exchange? It’s supposedly where you go, by mandate, to buy your health insurance. The exchange is supposed to just be a catalog, basically. And the only thing in the catalog are insurance policies, and you go there and you pick yours. You go there, decide what you want. That’s what the exchange is. Instead, the regime has decided to use these exchanges, probably part of the original plan, as Democrat get-out-the-vote efforts complete with walking-around money and employment for loyal Democrats. 
“California lawmakers passed a law (Senate Bill 35) requiring that voter registration be part of the health insurance exchange.” California lawmakers, again, passed Senate Bill 35 that requires voter registration be part of the health insurance exchange. Now, you think you’re going to the exchange to pick your insurance policy. Guess what? You’re gonna get pressured to register to vote, if you’re not, and maybe even if you already are. “Last month, Covered California announced $37 million in grants to 48 organizations to build public awareness about the opening of the health exchange on Oct. 1.” 
In other words, they’re treating this as the grand opening of a great shopping center, a great mall. They’re doing this to attract all kinds of people. It’s a government bureaucracy. It would be no different than if the DMV started running ads to get you to show up. 
“Of the 48 organizations that got grants, only a handful are health-care related.” For example, Covered California announced $37 million in grants to 48 organizations to build public awareness about the opening of the health care exchange. Now, why in the world would the California NAACP get $600,000? But they did. The California NAACP got $600,000 of Obamacare money, California exchange money, to go door-to-door canvassing and registering voters, and to create presentations at community organizations, presentations about the Democrat Party, presentations about registering and supporting the Democrat Party and its candidates.
Continue Reading on ...

Read more:

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Harry Reid shafts stupid Republicans who voted to debate the Amnesty Bill. Plans to cut off the debate.

File this under, I told you so. Read my blog from yesterday.

Democrats are pushing for Amnesty for only one reason: votes, Votes and more VOTES.

Center For Individual Freedom

Alert: Now That 30 Republican Betrayers Have Voted to "Debate" The Gang of Eight Amnesty Bill in the Senate, Harry Reid Wants to Cut Off Debate and Push a Quickie Vote on Amnesty This Coming Week.

       It was a betrayal. Senate Republicans had the chance to KILL the Gang-of-Eight Amnesty bill by simply rounding up 41 votes against bringing Amnesty to the floor of the Senate... but they didn't.

       Instead, these 30 Republican betrayers voted to breathe new life into a massive Amnesty bill they could have killed outright.

       To add insult to injury... many of you who have called these 30 betrayers are reporting back to us that they're telling you a half-truth... that they only voted in favor of "debating" Amnesty on the floor of the Senate... and somehow, refusing to kill the Gang of Eight Amnesty scheme should not be construed as support for Amnesty.

       And here's the ultimate irony... Harry Reid just announced that he's going to move to cut off debate and force a vote on the Gang’s Amnesty bill as early as this coming week... so much for voting in favor of simply "debating" Amnesty.

       Time is short. We can still kill Amnesty, but killing it starts with calling some elected officials on the carpet.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the United States. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the U.S. Senate.

Send My Blast Faxes

Here Are The Names Of The 30 Betrayers...

       Before we name them, let's clear the air. When these 30 Republican Senators voted in favor of "debating" Amnesty, they did so KNOWING FULL WELL that it would be all the more difficult to stop Amnesty by allowing it to hit the floor of a Democrat-controlled Senate.

       Don't be fooled by elected officials who tell you they really oppose Amnesty, then vote to give it life. Voting to bring the Gang of Eight bill to the floor of the Senate for debate is support for Amnesty... plain and simple.

       Ask yourself... if you opposed something and had the power to kill it, would you vote to kill it or would you vote to give your opposition the opportunity to pass it?

       And don't be fooled if they should tell you that Harry Reid tricked them by moving to cut off their precious debate. If they didn't know it would happen, they should have known that it would happen.

       Here are the 30 Republican betrayers: Alexander (R-TN), Ayotte (R-NH), Blunt (R-MO), Burr (R-NC), Chambliss (R-GA), Chiesa (R-NJ), Coats (R-IN), Cochran (R-MS), Coburn (R-OK), Collins (R-ME), Corker (R-TN), Cornyn (R-TX), Fischer (R-NE), Flake (R-AZ), Graham (R-SC), Hatch (R-UT), Heller (R-NV), Hoeven (R-ND), Isakson (R-GA), Johanns (R-NE), Johnson (R-WI), McConnell (R-KY), Moran (R-KS), Murkowski (R-AK), Paul (R-KY), Portman (R-OH), Rubio (R-FL), Thune (R-SD), Toomey (R-PA), Wicker (R-MS).

       We must get to them now because when Harry Reid moves to cut off debate, we have yet another opportunity to defeat the Gang of Eight Amnesty bill once and for all… But only if we can get 41 Senators, including many of the Republican betrayers listed above, to vote the right way.

       That’s right. Harry Reid is about to give us another bite at the apple because he knows that his chances of passing Amnesty will erode with each passing day; so he wants to pass it quick...

       He's taking a risk. He's giving us another chance to win, but this time around we must not allow ourselves to be fooled by Republican Senators who are ALREADY plotting to lose and planning to tell you: "I only voted in favor of cutting off debate and bringing Amnesty to a vote, but after I did, I voted against it."

       Remember, it only takes 41 votes to kill Amnesty – and the opportunity to get those 41 votes is once again imminent.

       That's why you must make it clear to these Republican Senators that you don't want them to simply vote against Amnesty... you want them to defeat the Gang of Eight Amnesty scheme once and for all.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the United States. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the U.S. Senate.

Send My Blast Faxes

Republicans Must Hear From You Now Because Too Many Of Them Are Actually Plotting To Lose This Fight.

       Think about it. If you were a Republican Senator and you refused to kill Amnesty out of some misguided belief that the legislation should be "debated" on the floor of the Senate; and Harry Reid then moved to cut off your precious debate and force a quickie vote... how would you react?

       Any rational person would explode: 'To hell with you Harry Reid, I will not tolerate such shenanigans... your Amnesty bill dies today.'

       But some of our Republican leaders are not acting rationally. Instead, they're burning the midnight oil to cut a deal BEFORE a vote on Reid's coming motion to cut off debate can take place.

       Politico reports: "Reid urged his colleagues to get in other significant amendments as soon as they can. That includes an effort by Sens. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and John Hoeven (R-N.D.) to come to some sort of compromise on border security language with the Gang of Eight."

       Politico goes on to report: "Corker said on Monday that the group of senators working on a compromise on border security that could appeal to both Democrats on Republicans is getting close, but wouldn’t tip his hand."

       "'There are a number of folks who are working together to try to attempt to get to that place... I think we’re getting close. But again there’s a number of conversations underway and it continues to be slightly fluid..."

       No, your eyes are not playing tricks on you. They're not just trying to cut a deal... they're hustling to cut a deal, which is simply UNACCEPTABLE.

       They've lost their way... they're on the wrong track... someone needs to set them straight before it's too late... and that someone is you.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the United States. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the U.S. Senate.

Send My Blast Faxes

Beware Of Deals, Triggers And Compromises.

       What is fueling this Republican betrayal? Opinions abound, but the editors of National Review Online just gave us some food for thought on the matter.

       "This bill is in no small part a... product of the media-consultant complex that has convinced Republicans that immigration reform is the key to the Hispanic heart, and that Hispanic votes are the key to winning future presidential elections."

       And National Review Online adds that, for Gang of Eight Amnesty supporters, the "play now is clearly to come up with some fig leaf of an amendment on enforcement that won’t affect the fundamentals of the bill [Amnesty], while giving enough Republicans cover to vote for it."

       Here's a news flash for our Republican Senators: Hispanics aren't going to vote for you because you helped Democrats grant Amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, and the American people already know the "enforcement provisions" that appear in this Amnesty bill are bogus. Stop looking for cover.

       National Review Online again: "Most of the so-called security triggers in the bill are paper tigers. The requirement that those applying for amnesty have clean criminal records in fact allows for two misdemeanor convictions and, like most of the triggers, can be waived by the Department of Homeland Security."

       National Review Online yet again: "[T]he fines for illegal immigrants contemplated by the Gang of Eight can, under the current bill, be waived by DHS, and the collection of unpaid taxes applies only to levies already assessed by our dear friends at the IRS. The main security provisions of the legislation require only that DHS draw up a plan for security."

       Here's the bottom line. Our immigration system is indeed broken. Washington broke it and it can't be fixed by simply allowing politicians in Washington, who are beholden to special interests, to continue breaking it.

       Our border is not secure (despite far too many false promises in the past to secure it), millions of people who are playing by the rules and attempting to enter the United States legally are forced to take a back seat, and granting Amnesty to those who have broken the law by coming here illegally will only encourage millions more to do the same.

       Senator Ted Cruz had it right when he said: "I think we should all be champions of legal immigrants making the system work and not just welcoming, but celebrating legal immigrants," and that real reform should not be "held hostage to an issue that is deeply divisive... We need to improve legal immigration... we need to streamline it... we need to reduce the bureaucracy... the red tape.. the waiting periods... one of the reasons we see illegal immigration at the levels we do is because our legal immigration system is no working effectively."

       We stand with Senator Cruz. We need real immigration reform... compassionate immigration reform... common-sense immigration reform... but real reform will NEVER happen if we allow politicians in Washington to pass this Gang of Eight Scamnesty bill... And the sooner we kill this fraud, the sooner we can enact real immigration reform.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Republican Member of the United States. Or alternatively, send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the U.S. Senate.

Send My Blast Faxes

Yours In Freedom
Center For Individual Freedom

Center for Individual Freedom
815 King Street
Suite 303
Alexandria, VA 22314
Phone: 703-535-5836
Fax: 703-535-5838
CFIF is a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit constitutional advocacy organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights. Contributions to CFIF are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.

Reposted from Israel: The “Down Low” POTUS And Rev Wright’s Guiding Hand: Trinity Church’s Many Secrets Stripped Naked…Addendum To: Mysterious Deaths Never Far From Barack HUSSEIN Obama …Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The “Down Low” POTUS And Rev Wright’s Guiding Hand: Trinity Church’s Many Secrets Stripped Naked…Addendum To: Mysterious Deaths Never Far From Barack HUSSEIN Obama…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Here’s the poop and the scoop: this blogger has too many localized menaces to angst over, leaving little time/energy to obsess over another adult’s sexual proclivities. Who cares.

However, the calculus changes if the following ensues: a gang-bang by radical gay activists via infiltration into kiddie confines (their indoctrinating march into the public schools must be cut off at the knees); as well as the hidden lifestyle of the leader of the free world, demarcating a treasure trove of blackmail potential.

Add to the bonfire four dead males (one was his gay lover..another…the jury’s still out), and it becomes more than enough circumstantial evidence against the bent POTUS. Average folks end up in prison cells, and for a whole lot less. Besides, those unlucky enough to cross swords with ‘The One’ keep dropping like flies. So, if peeking into another’s private life ever made sense, a navel gazing towards Obama’s “significant others” surely qualifies. And the reference is not about Michele!

As previously demonstrated, ‘Mysterious Deaths Are Never Far From Barack Hussein Obama’ -
Indictment Number One.

And if a POTUS plays fast and loose in all walks of life, who is to say that he should EVER be trusted – sexually or otherwise? ‘What Constitutes Mysterious Deaths Under The Obama Regime…’ lays out a solid circumstantial case against an immoral regime, emanating from the Radical-in-Chief -
Indictment Number Two.
Now, onto the latest nail in the above indictments, surely worthy of media scrutiny. Where’s a grand jury when you need one?


‘Matchmaker’ Rev. Jeremiah Wright ‘provided cover for gays’ 

NEW YORK – “Ten years ago, the New York Times reported on a growing underground subculture in the black community known as Down Low, comprised largely of men who secretly engage in homosexual activity while living “straight” lives in public.

It’s within that subtext that opposition researchers for Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign began investigating rumors that Rev. Jeremiah Wright was running a “matchmaking service” for members of his Trinity United Church of Christ known as the Down Low Club, which included Barack Obama.

Over the past several months, WND investigators have interviewed a number of members of the church who claim the president benefited from Wright’s efforts to help black men who engage in homosexual activity appear respectable in black society by finding them a wife.

The 2003 New York Times story, “Double Lives on the Down Low,” said that though many black men reject “a gay culture they perceive as white and effeminate,” they “have settled on a new identity, with its own vocabulary and customs and its own name: Down Low.”

The Times said that while “there are black men who are openly gay, it seems that the majority of those having sex with men still lead secret lives, products of a black culture that deems masculinity and fatherhood as a black man’s primary responsibility – and homosexuality as a white man’s perversion.”

The Down Low Club at Trinity “doesn’t have meetings, and it isn’t like the Rotary Club,” a source identified for this article as “Carolyn” explained to a WND investigator in Chicago.

“It was more that Wright served as a matchmaker,” said Carolyn, a 20-year member of Trinity who has played a role in church administration and knows the Obamas personally.

“He kept his eye on the young guys coming up in Trinity,” she said, “and if he spotted someone that acted or looked gay, then Wright would give them kind of a guidance counselor-type direction on how to keep down low – how to do the things they wanted to do, but then also getting married and looking ‘respectable’ – being part of black society.”

To Trinity insiders, the Down Low Club was simply known as “the program.”

“That’s the terminology. At Trinity, you’re urged to ‘get with the program,’” explained a male beneficiary of the Down Low Club. “What that means is it’s OK to go ahead and have sex with men, just as long as you ‘get with the program’ and marry a woman, somebody no straight guy would want to marry.”

The wife, the Down Low Club member explained, is “your ‘beard,’ your cover – so you can look like you’re living a straight life, even though you’re not.”

The male source was a “computer consultant” who claims not to know “scratch” about computers. But “getting with the program” at Trinity meant he could keep living a “gay” life and receive lots of computer consulting work thrown his way by Trinity, as long as he was willing to marry an unattractive woman who otherwise might have ended up a lonely spinster with no means to provide for living.

Carolyn explained that for many black families, attending Trinity was a way out of poverty.

“Trinity was a chance to network,” she said. “The stuff preached was hateful, but about 70 percent of those who go there ignore the radical rhetoric and just trying to get ahead.”

Carolyn said Trinity “helped a lot of blacks get successful and connected.”

“That’s what Wright did for Obama,” she claimed. “He connected Obama in the community, and he helped Obama hide his homosexuality.”

Openly homosexual author and commentator Keith Boykin, a former White House adviser to President Bill Clinton, mentions Obama’s former pastor, Wright, on pages 264-265 of his 2005 book “Beyond the Down Low: Sex, Lies, and Denial in Black America.” While Boykin doesn’t refer to the Down Low Club by name, he regards Wright as among a small group of ministers who are “coming to grips with sexuality and opening up a dialogue with heterosexuals, homosexuals, and bisexuals in the pews.”

Chicago-based author, businessman, speaker and HIV/AIDS activist J.L. King wrote a controversial book in 2005 called “On the Down Low: A Journey into the Lives of ‘Straight’ Black Men who Sleep with Men.”
He was a guest on Oprah Winfrey’s Chicago-based TV show in 2004, which described him this way: “J.L. King had a life most would envy. He married his high school sweetheart, had two healthy children and was on the fast track to success. But, unbeknownst to his family and friends, he had a dark secret—he was living on the down low.”

Carolyn and the other members of Trinity who provided statements corroborating her testimony were insistent that WND conceal their identities as a condition of being interviewed.

“I’m still scared to discuss any of this,” Carolyn said.

“At Trinity, if you even hint at talking about Obama being gay, you are reminded of our dear departed choir director,” she said. “He was killed, and it wasn’t a robbery. The Christmas presents weren’t touched. The TV was not taken, nothing in the apartment was missing.”

Carolyn’s reference was to Donald Young, the 47-year-old homosexual choirmaster at Trinity who died of multiple gunshot wounds in his Chicago apartment Dec. 24, 2007.

Young’s murder was preceded Nov. 17, 2007, with the execution-style murder of 25-year-old Larry Bland, another black gay member of Trinity United. He also was murdered in his home, dying of multiple gunshot wounds, according to his death certificate.

Just two days after the murder of Young, a third openly “gay” member of Wright’s church, Nate Spencer, reportedly died of septicemia, pneumonia and AIDS.

Sensational charges
As WND reported last month, a prominent member of Chicago’s homosexual community claims Obama’s participation in the “gay” bar and bathhouse scene was so well known that many who were aware of his lifestyle were shocked when he ran for president and finally won the White House.

In April, WND reported a federal judge dismissed a libel case against Larry Sinclair, a homosexual who claimed Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign had paid to rig a polygraph test regarding Sinclair’s sensational charge that he had sex and used cocaine twice with Obama while Obama was an Illinois state senator. Sinclair tells his story in “Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder.”

WND also reported former radical activist John Drew has said that when he met Obama when Obama was a student at Occidental College, he thought Obama and his then-Pakistani roommate were “gay” lovers.
In addition, rumors have swirled around Obama’s relationship with his personal aide and former “body man,” Reggie Love, who resurfaced on the eve of the Republican National Convention to support his old boss. Love resigned from the White House in November 2011 after compromising photographs of him as a college student received wide circulation.

WND also has documented in two separate articles, here and here, that Obama wore a gold band on his wedding ring finger from the time he attended Occidental College through his student days at Harvard Law School.

Shocking phone call
Sinclair gave an affidavit to the Chicago Police Department regarding contacts he says he had with Young just prior to Young’s murder.

According to Sinclair’s affidavit, published in its entirety beginning on page 56 of his book, he contacted Obama’s presidential campaign in September 2007. Sinclair says he requested that Obama correct claims he made about when he stopped abusing drugs to reflect use of crack cocaine during their sex encounters in November 1999.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Obama had stated famously he stopped using marijuana and cocaine in college, implying his drug abuse ended when he had completed his first two years of college at Occidental in Los Angeles.

Sinclair explained that when he made contact with the Obama campaign in September 2007, he provided callback numbers, in case the campaign wanted to get in touch with him.

Then, in late September or early October 2007, as Sinclair stated in his affidavit, he received a call from a male identifying himself as “Mr. Young,” who stated he was responding to calls Sinclair had made to the Obama campaign.

“This first call shocked me in that this ‘Mr. Young’ asked me why I had not asked Senator Obama to disclose sexual encounters I had with Mr. Obama in 1999,” Sinclair’s affidavit reads. “I was shocked as I had never mentioned to the campaign or anyone working for the campaign any sexual encounters. The call ended with Mr. Young stating I would hear from someone in a few days.”

Sinclair claims it was in a second call from “Mr. Young” that he began to suspect the man had been sexually intimate with Obama. Sinclair said he drew that conclusion “by the tone of the conversation” and by its “sexual nature.”

In late October 2007, Sinclair received a text message from “Mr. Young” stating Young “was intimately involved with Senator Obama and that Obama was discussing with him and his pastor how to publicly acknowledge Senator Obama’s drug use in 1999.”

The text message also indicated Obama wanted to make sure Sinclair had not discussed the sexual encounters or drug use with any media at that time.

In November 2007, Sinclair received a second text message from “Mr. Young,” advising him that Obama would publicly correct his statement as to the last time he used drugs and that Sinclair did not need to concern himself with publicly disclosing it.

Then, in early December 2007, Sinclair received his last contact with “Mr. Young,” with Young making it clear Obama had no intention of acknowledging publicly his use of crack cocaine in 1999.
After Young was murdered, Sinclair had several contacts with Young’s family.

“In several telephone conversations with his sisters, brothers, nieces and others, I was reassured that the family of Donald Young believed he was murdered to protect Barack Obama,” Sinclair wrote. “It also became clear, right from the start that members of the Young family were truly fearful of speaking out publicly, to this day, they fear for their own personal, physical safety.”

On July 17, 2010, the supermarket tabloid The Globe published an interview with Norma Jean Young, the 76-year-old mother of the slain choirmaster, in which she expressed fear that her son was murdered to protect Obama.

“What was the cause of my son’s death?” Norma Jean Young asked in the Globe interview. “I’m very suspicious that it may have been related to Obama. Donald and Obama were very close friends. Whatever went on with this is very private. I am suspicious of a cover-up!”

She insisted there is “more to the story,” calling on Chicago police to ramp up their investigation.
“I do believe they are shielding somebody or protecting somebody,” she told The Globe.

Asked who would benefit from a cover-up, Norma Jean Young said, “It could be anyone, including Obama.”

Shortly after the Globe interview was published, Norma Jean Young left Chicago and lived for a while in Peoria, Ill. Her current residence is unknown.

The murders of Donald Young and Larry Bland remain today open cases of unsolved homicide.”
FEW things rile up average folks more than a wayward spouse. Now imagine all of the above and nail onto it the following outrage: a POTUS who “learned” in the pews of a Pastor, who aided and abetted serial adultery. Ain’t Black Nationalist Theology a breath of fresh air…stripped of puritanical constraints of monogamy!

Color this ( white ) blogger a prude – that’s worth a chuckle – but a POTUS who takes “marriage” advice; plus rears his kiddies, in a Church led by a Pastor who bends over backwards to accommodate a “down low” lifestyle; is unworthy of taking care of cats and dogs, let alone the stewardship of the free world!

“Obama Gotta Go”…straight into a jail cell…while we all bebop to - 

UPDATE: just came upon this very credible site…looks like this gay Conservative activist blogger views things in a mirror image light -