Friday, March 22, 2019

Should Chief Justice John Roberts be removed from the Supreme Court if he broke the law?

The integrity of judicial decisions demands impartiality. But what happens when someone holds a gun to the head of the blind lady holding the scales of justice? In this case, the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

This first quoted source is dated, March 1, 2019.
Bloomberg
Politics
Hold the Revolution: Roberts Keeps Joining High Court Liberals
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-01/hold-the-revolution-roberts-keeps-joining-high-court-liberals
“Chief Justice John Roberts is showing a new willingness to side with the U.S. Supreme Court’s liberal wing after the divisive confirmation fight over Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Roberts joined the liberals Wednesday in two rulings that left the conservatives in dissent. Most notably, he cast the deciding vote to order a new look at the mental competence of a death row inmate who says he can’t remember the crimes he committed.”
Why would he do such a thing?

Chief Justice John Roberts has been a reliably conservative upholder of the Constitution since he was appointed to the Supreme Court by President George W. Bush in 2005. But in 2012, he went off the deep end over the ObamaCare matter. 

When the ObamaCare case went before the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012, Chief Justice John Roberts appeared to be inclined to overturn it on the rule of law which declared the mandate as a penalty was unconstitutional, but then he switched his position at the last moment and wrote the deciding opinion to uphold ObamaCare on a new technical definition where Roberts dreamed up how the mandate was instead a tax.
It was rumored at the time that he had been blackmailed with the revelation about illegally adopting two Irish born children.
Source:  Personal Liberty column written by Bob Livingston
More Evidence That The U.S. Government Is A Criminal Enterprise, July 15, 2013 
https://personalliberty.com/more-evidence-that-the-u-s-government-is-a-criminal-enterprise/
“It’s likely that Chief Justice John Roberts, who switched his vote in the final minutes before the Supreme Court released its Obamacare decision, did so because he was blackmailed over the illegal adoption of his children.”
But first some background. 

Do you know how Barack Hussein Obama became a U.S. Senator from Illinois? Obama won the seat in 2004 in an election against Alan Keyes who replaced Republican Primary election winner, Jack Ryan. Therein lies the mystery.
Jack Ryan was a popular Republican Senator from Illinois. He was married to Jeri Lynn Zimmerman, former Miss Illinois 1989, later known as Hollywood actress Jeri Ryan from 1991-1999.  During their divorce, Jeri Ryan claimed in court that her husband took her to sex clubs in New York and Paris. The important point is the divorce records were sealed by the court. It was rumored that someone loyal to Barack Hussein Obama managed to get a hold of the records and release them to the media, which caused Jack Ryan to end his reelection campaign and resign.

Source: Jeri Ryan -- The Real Obama Girl
https://www.tmz.com/2008/02/15/jeri-ryan-the-real-obama-girl/
“If Barack Obama ends up winning the White House, the first person he should probably thank on Election Night is ... Jeri Ryan. Like, "Star Trek's" Seven of Nine Jeri Ryan? Yup.

Let's explain. Back in 2004, when Obama was a small-time State Senator from Illinois and running for a U.S. Senate seat, his GOP opponent was Jack Ryan, a super-wealthy businessman who was actually favored in the contest -- and who had gone through a messy divorce from ... Jeri Ryan.

The divorce was a slapfight of Hasselhoffian proportions, and Jeri's allegations that Jack had forced her to go to sex clubs in New York and Paris -- and wanted her to have sex with him in the clubs -- completely ruined Jack's campaign ... and Obama went on to win the seat. And now, perhaps, the one in the Oval Office.”
So is it even possible to question the integrity of any of Barack Hussein Obama's most trusted aids who managed to get a copy of records sealed by a court? It is not too far a stretch to imagine that given the level of political intrigue in Washington that someone would look for an angle to twist some arms. If Obama was so desperate to protect his landmark legislation, is it conceivable he would blackmail the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?

Back in August 2005, a website called Underneath the robes, which specialized in rumors heard in the hallways of our highest courts, ran a story about the adoption of two Irish-born babies by Chief Justice John Roberts and his wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts.
 
In 2000, Chief Justice John Roberts and his wife Jane Sullivan Roberts adopted two infant babies born that same year in Ireland.  According to the law in Ireland at the time, children born in Ireland could only be adopted by citizens of Ireland. To skirt around the law, the two infants were flown to Bolivia where the adoption was finalized.
It is very possible the source for the blackmail, if that is what happened, came from this courthouse blog in 2005. All it would take would be a whisper in the ear that we know you broke the law so you better play our game.
Source: https://underneaththeirrobes.blogs.com/main/2005/08/the_roberts_ado.html

3. So were the children adopted from Ireland?

This is not clear -- the Associated Press reports that they were "adopted from Latin America." This seems a bit puzzling, in light of the Time magazine report indicating that the children were born in Ireland. Also, their blonde hair and fair skin do not seem conventionally Latin American. Perhaps the children were born in Ireland, but were in Latin America immediately prior to their adoption.

4. How were the children adopted?

According to The New York Times, based on information from Mrs. Roberts's sister, Mary Torre, the children were adopted through a private adoption. As explained by Families for Private Adoption, "[p]rivate (or independent) adoption is a legal method of building a family through adoption without using an adoption agency for placement. In private adoption, the birth parents relinquish their parental rights directly to the adoptive parents, instead of to an agency.”
A person who identified herself as Ellen immediately posted the following comment to sum up the rumor.
Comment by: Ellen.
Does Ireland place children for adoption internationally? If not, then he probably did some finagling to have the children sent to Bolivia so they could adopt them in that country. But that doesn't really make any sense, as he and his wife are not citizens of Bolivia.

A possible scenario: The Roberts wanted to adopt, put out some feelers, found two pregnant women around the same time in Ireland, and it was all arranged privately. I don't think it's common practice to set out to adopt one child and then suddenly have an opportunity to adopt a second almost immediately after. Usually, for the common folk, you have to wait and then go through the process again for the 2nd child.

But the scenario above would enable them to skirt US (?) and Irish law, perhaps.

The fishy thing is who was responsible for the children after they left Ireland and arrived Bolivia? I don't think an adoption agency would be party to whatever occurred here.

Posted by: Ellen | August 09, 2005 at 11:07 PM
Just today, I read CNN author Joan Biskupic's abbreviated excerpt from her book, “The inside story of how John Roberts negotiated to save Obamacare”, on CNN Politics. Given the fact that CNN is one of the prime sources of Fake News, it is easy to suspect anything relating back to the Democrats self-anointed holy man, Barack Hussein Obama, would be scrubbed clean of any innuendo.  I wanted to ask her what she may have known about the rumor that the Chief Justice was being blackmailed to change his position on ObamaCare because of his illegal adoption of two Irish children from Ireland. The only contact I could find was for Kait Howard, Publicist, BASIC BOOKS so I sent her an email. kait.howard@hbgusa.com I will update this if, and when, I get an answer.


Sunday, March 17, 2019

Fighting for life in Commonwealth

Fighting for life in Commonwealth

FRANKFORT, Ky. (KT) - At least now we have clarity on the issue. Now that the hard left has dropped the pretense of “safe, legal and rare” or “a collection of cells is not a fetus,” we can better see beneath their masks. With the passage of a barbaric new law in New York, we now see that the true agenda of pro-abortion advocates across this nation is the mass murder of innocent babies, even after they have been born and are crying for their mothers.

That’s a difficult line to read, much less to allow to sink in to one’s consciousness. Tragically…monstrously, it is an accurate reflection of the liberal position in New York and Virginia, and is sadly true for some liberals in Kentucky as well.

I am grateful that the vast majority of my fellow Kentuckians will not stand for this in our Commonwealth. We will not allow the most innocent among us to be treated in this horrific manner. That is why, led by our administration, we have passed some of the most effective pro-life measures in America today. I applaud the General Assembly for the overwhelming bipartisan support of these measures. On average, these bills passed with over 80 percent support of representatives and senators from both parties.

In Kentucky we have laws to:

·        Ban abortions after 20 weeks (when babies can feel pain).

·        Require an ultrasound before abortion so the mother at least has the option to see her baby.

·        Protect babies from being dismembered in the womb.

My legal team has been working tirelessly to defend many of these laws in court. Defending Kentucky law should be the responsibility of the attorney general, who Kentucky voters elected for that purpose. But Andy Beshear not only has refused to defend these laws, and thus defend babies, he recently wrote a letter that can only be described as desperate.

In a futile attempt to intimidate our legislators from passing additional protections in this session, Beshear decried proposed bills for 2019 as unconstitutional. Beshear has now made a habit of being to the left of Planned Parenthood on abortion. He previously (and erroneously) wrote that our 20-week abortion ban would be unconstitutional, even though Planned Parenthood has never challenged that law in court.

Speaking of court challenges, the effectiveness of our pro-life laws and of my administration’s legal team was made evident in recent weeks when Planned Parenthood and other hard left, pro-abortion groups announced their intent to pool their ample economic and legal resources to fight against Kentucky babies. Those groups are bringing $90 million into our state, along with additional armies of liberal lawyers to try to tear down Kentucky laws protecting life.

As we ponder the heinous nature of the New York law and the bill that was shamelessly proposed in Virginia, Kentuckians must realize that pro-abortion radicals are even suing for the right to dismember a third trimester baby.

They are suing for the right to commit barbaric acts and our attorney general is standing with them…not us. Our administration is even forced to defend a 20-year-old law in court that merely requires an emergency room transfer agreement to ensure the safety of the mother and baby in the event of a botched abortion.

Not long ago, I was mocked by a handful of liberals in the media and entertainment industry when I cautioned about the “culture of death” that now pervades video games, much of our “entertainment” and a startling amount of our music. Can those same critics honestly make light of those cautions in the midst of the grotesque celebrations in New York as they legalized infanticide?

Recently, liberal politicians and entertainers were lauded as courageous during the Women’s March for defending a “woman’s right to choose.” Applauding infanticide and playing word games by calling murder a “choice” as one panders to hard-left supporters is anything but courageous. On the contrary, standing up for life, with the current state of our culture and against the countless millions of lobbying dollars from leftists, is a display of true courage. I am grateful to all those men and women who take that valiant stand every day.

As long as I am Kentucky’s governor, I too will take that courageous stand. As long as the Bevin administration exists, we will fight with all of our intellect, our talent, and our heart to defend the innocent. We will fight for life.

Matt Bevin is governor of Kentucky.

Friday, March 15, 2019

Why are Republicans in Congress afraid of defending our country?

Sometimes I get a little sick listening to the purists complain about everything President Trump does. How many people realize that in January 2017 when Trump entered the White House it was still staffed by hostile people loyal to Barack Hussein Obama. In the ensuing two years Trump has been working in the most toxic atmosphere ever seen in Washington trying to get his agenda in place and the lily-livered Republicans have been back stabbing him ever since.

Donald Trump was being given a lot of bad advice from the very beginning. Yes, he could have and should have fired all the Obama loyalists, not just among the White House staff but in the Justice Dept. and in the FBI. He also should never have appointed any sitting member of Congress to his Cabinet. And Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions was a perfect example why. Sessions was a reliable conservative but he was too closely attached to the Washington establishment and in the end his seat was taken by a Democrat.

The only proper place there should be any purists in our government is on the Supreme Court as in the example of the late Justice Anton Scalia who referred to himself as an "originalist". We certainly don't need them in Congress. Our country is facing a monumental crisis and we MUST defend our borders otherwise our Sovereign Nation will cease to exist. We have been looking at a slow moving invasion by hostile forces and our Republican leaders seemingly refuse to acknowledge it. The only way to protect ourselves is to build a wall along our Southern boarder. And President Trump is determined to get it built any way he can.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Democrats speak to Democrats in coded messages only they understand.

Have you ever heard of Aesopian Language? I am sure you have heard it spoken but didn't know what it was. This is the definition from Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesopian_language
"Aesopian language is communications that convey an innocent meaning to outsiders but hold a concealed meaning to informed members of a conspiracy or underground movement."
Here is a perfect example from recent news. House Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi says: "We do the Lord's work." And makes you think of the only Lord you know, Jesus. But Nancy isn't talking about Jesus, she is talking about Barack Hussein Obama, the deity of the Democrat Party.
Obama was their god. Pelosi still does his work. This is who she worships.
These pictures are how Democrats envisioned him. All the photos on the top row are official White House pictures taken by the White House photographer. Isn't it coincidental that so many images managed to pick up a glowing halo around his head to convince low-educated people this was a holy man of some sort.

All the pictures on the bottom row are from various left wing publications that show how Obama is adored by his followers. And the similarity to Christ-likenesses is just another coincidence.
Never assume you know who or what they are talking about because Democrats speak to Democrats in coded messages only they understand.
 My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.

Friday, January 11, 2019

Child brides approved by Obama administration.

Just revealed, between 2007-2017, during the Obama administration, US State Dept approved applications of child brides. “there were 5,556 approvals for those seeking to bring minor spouses or fiancees, and 2,926 approvals by minors seeking to bring in older spouses” “Middle Eastern nationals had the highest percentage of overall approved petitions.”

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/01/11/child-brides-us-approved-thousands-bride-requests-over-decade/2545951002/

Wednesday, January 9, 2019

Dem Party 'Has Gone So Far Left It's Unrecognizable'

Maybe some people in the conservative news media think the Democrat Party has become unrecognizable but I haven't. I can see it for what it really is very clearly. For over a Century the Democrat Party has been labeled the party of Treason. Now that Left-wing Democrats are in control of the House of Representatives their previously covert agenda will become visible. The battle to destroy America has begun. The faces may have changed but not the message. As the last image shows this problem has been going on for over a century.





 

Wednesday, November 7, 2018

2018 Mid-term elections. Libertarians still helping Democrats get elected

Anyone who thinks that the Libertarian Party is a logical choice to being a conservative Republican should understand how often Libertarian candidates help Democrats get elected.
The Senate race in Montana is a perfect example.  Democrat Jon Tester has been projected to win with 49.4% against Republican Matt Rosendale with 47.8%. But there was a third party Libertarian candidate named Rick Brekenridge with almost no campaign to speak of who pulled in 2.9% of the vote.
Just as what happened in Virginia 4 years ago, the Libertarian candidate received a valuable assist with a statewide printing and mailing boosting the Brekenridge campaign and no one knows where the money came from.
In Virginia, an investigation proved that the Democrat Party paid for a similar state-wide mailing that helped the Libertarian candidate pull in just enough votes to allow the Democrat to narrowly pass the Republican.
Whether or not the Libertarian candidates are suffering delusions of grandeur or just overblown egos, their presence on a ballot enables the Democrats to siphon off  votes  that would have go to the Republican.

Here's the complete story on the Virginia election.

Wednesday, November 6, 2013


Libertarians funded by big Democrat supporters help defeat Republican in Virginia governor's race.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides




Thursday, June 21, 2018

The root causes of political madness


Dr. Lyle Rossiter is a forensic psychiatrist. In 2006 he wrote a book called "The Liberal Mind, The Psychological Causes of Political Madness". This book has become a mainstay of political humor poking fun at liberals and Democrats alike. Now a new fact has been uncovered that adds to the story.
In New York City, the Mecca for liberal education is Columbia University. On the Columbia University campus there are probably more liberals, socialists, communists and Democrats per capita than anywhere in the world. What many people do not realize is that in 1900, Columbia's Morningside campus was once the home of another institution, the Bloomingdale Insane Asylum.

So the root causes of political madness stem from the foundations of an old insane asylum.

https://untappedcities.com/2013/07/30/five-of-nycs-former-asylums-converted-into-apartments-classrooms-churches-and-more/2/

Quote: "The Bloomingdale Insane Asylum once occupied much of what is now the Columbia University Main Campus. In 1821, the asylum opened its doors, and twenty years later, when the New York City Lunatic Asylum opened for the destitute, Bloomingdale essentially became reserved for wealthier patients (although it failed to offer better treatment). The hospital grounds eventually became filled with gardens and walkways to assist with the patients’ recuperation. In the 1880’s, the asylum’s properties were sold off to different institutions in Morningside Heights, including Columbia University. Today, the only remaining building from Bloomingdale is Buell Hall, which houses the university’s Maison Fran├žaise French cultural center and some architectural galleries."
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides

Monday, November 6, 2017

The plot to take over the world is not a Sci-Fi fantasy, its real.

Another mass shooting

Another mass shooting yesterday morning claimed the lives of at least 27 people attending Sunday service at the First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs in a small town in Texas. This follows another shooting in Las Vegas where twice as many people were killed at a concert. And everyone is asking why. I think I know the answer. I strongly believe we are witnessing the most violent movement in history to sway public opinion on gun ownership. The only objective is to disarm American citizens and whoever is behind it will do anything to win.

Two days ago ABC News broadcast a Diane Sawyer report
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/isis-recruit-young-americans-50904740
"How ISIS is trying to recruit young Americans Video - ABC News" It documented how ordinary people could be recruited by the Islamic Terrorist organization to commit acts of terrorism.

It is just that simple for evil people to find anyone willing to do the things they want. There are certainly enough crazies out there spending countless hours playing role model Internet games filled with gore and bloodshed. Isn't
doing the real thing just the next logical step?

And the big question is WHO ARE THEY? Who is behind it? Would you believe a plot to literally take over the world? What do you think a “One World Government” is? From what current events tells us it is most likely a collaboration between American Leftist Elites, Democratic Socialists and International Socialists and Communists such as George Soros who are pushing for One World Government. They have effectively disarmed the citizens in every country except the USA. And every push to convince the public to agree to disarm in every country was precipitated by a mass shooting. It happened in Australia, in Great Britain, in Norway, Finland, Slovakia, Belgium, The Netherlands, Canada and France. It happened  in too many places. And now the people in those countries no longer have the means for self-defense. Or to protect themselves from a tyrannical government.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.

Sunday, December 18, 2016

We know this truth to be self evident: Illegals Voted.

Liberals are having a psychotic episode over the election of Donald Trump. Their threats before the election to leave America and give up their citizenship if he won were very entertaining to hear. Now that Trump did win they are coming out of the woodwork like an army of termites crying, screaming, rioting in the streets and foaming at the mouth that Trump-Is-Not-My-President. It's as if they were part of a choreographed flash mob or a church choir all singing the same song. Since most of this is being financed by the same left wing people its safe to say they are being choreographed.
The headlines on cable news and print media carry the same or similar messages as Breitbart reported today: CNN’s Rye: Trump’s election “Far from legitimate,’ ‘That guy is not my president’  to Michael Moore: Trump ‘Has no right to enter’ White House. Its bad enough to be brainwashed by the mainstream media and virtually every talk show on TV with this same unending monologue, but some leftists have gone a step further and have been taunting and threatening the Republican delegates to the Electoral College to “vote their consciences’ when the delegates assemble in each state capitol tomorrow to vote. Even a handful of has been Hollywood leftists with deep pockets have joined in to produce videos aimed directly at each delegate to offer more persuasion to switch their vote.
All of this because Hillary Rodham Clinton won the overall popular vote while Donald J. Trump won the states with the most Electoral Votes. The liberals claim that Hillary’s 3-million popular vote plurality over Trump makes her more deserving to be president. But what about those 3-million votes? Where did they come from?
New York and California gave Hillary a very big win that accounts for most or all of her popular vote plurality but these states have always been traditional Democrat controlled strongholds. They are also two of a handful of states that don’t require voter identification to register or to vote. It has been estimated that there is anywhere from 10-20 million illegal immigrants living in the United States with over a million living in California alone. And, as with those people on welfare, they usually vote for Democrats in very large numbers.
To make matters worse, if that is even possible, courts have frequently ruled against voter ID requirements, and even showing proof of citizenship. And last but not least, Barack Hussein Obama publicly advised a young  immigrant woman who asked if she should fear voting, because immigration will come and get her and her family. The exact transcript of the exchange was reported on BizPacReview.
Here is the exact question Obama was asked by actress Gina Rodriguez in a live pre-election interview Nov. 3:

“Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens — and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country — are fearful of voting. So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?”

“This is not true,” Obama said. “And the reason is — first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself, and there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for.”


With the highest ranking Democrat in the nation telling people it is OK to break the law and vote even if you are not a citizen and not to worry about anyone trying to deport you, it is obvious that a very large number of votes received by Hillary Rodham Clinton did not come from citizens of the United States. So just how many valid votes did she get? If the recount effort in Michigan is any clue, 37% of the precincts in Detroit found that they could not re-certify the count totals because they found too many discrepancies, doesn't that tell you something?
‘This Isn’t Normal’: Too Many Votes In 37% Of Detroit Precincts
In 248 of Detroit’s 662 precincts, more votes were recorded on voter machines than should have been in the November presidential election, The Detroit News reports.
The state will audit the 20 precincts that showed significant problems. The audit was triggered by shocking results at one polling place where 306 people were recorded to have voted, but only 52 ballots were found sealed in the container.
None of this is really surprising since the national Democratic Party is just as lawless and has always been as corrupt and dishonest as Hillary Rodham Clinton and the entire Clinton Family Foundation //aka// the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Old time Democrats will always remember the traditional instructions to: "Vote early and vote often." And keep track of the local obituaries so you can always vote in the name of a recently departed. 
Strip away all these illegal votes and Donald J. Trump was elected by a landslide.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides