Sunday, September 30, 2012

Barack Hussein Obama's documented list of infamous firsts.

When the Founding Fathers, who gave birth to our great Constitutional Republic, first asked Gen. George Washington to be our leader, some wanted him to be crowned King. Washington declined the offer and we have had an elected president instead. Today we have an Imperial Presidency. A fraudulent imposter who was manipulated into the White House by way of a communist conspiracy. A man named Barack Hussein Obama who started looting our Treasury to pay off his friends and to enjoy a lavish lifestyle - one fit for a king. A lifestyle that he and his family have cost American taxpayers more than a billion dollars. 


The first president to abandon freedom. The first president to go to war on freedom of speech. The first president to align with enemies of freedom vowing to destoy America and our very way of life. The first president to co-sponsor a resolution at the UN restricting the freedom of speech under the shari'a (Islamic law).

If he wins, America is lost.

"President Barack Obama's Complete List of Historic Firsts" Director Blue

Law and Justice

• First President to Violate the War Powers Act (Unilaterally Executing American Military Operations in Libya Without Informing Congress In the Required Time Period - Source: Huffington Post)
• First President to Triple the Number of Warrantless Wiretaps of U.S. Citizens (Source: ACLU)
• First President to Have His Attorney General Held in Criminal Contempt of Congress For His Efforts to Cover Up Operation Fast and Furious, That Killed Over 300 Individuals (Source: Politico)
• First President to Issue Unlawful "Recess-Appointments" Over a Long Weekend -- While the U.S. Senate Remained in Session (against the advice of his own Justice Department - Source: Heritage Foundation)
• First President to Sue States for Enforcing Voter ID Requirements, Which Were Previously Ruled Legal by the U.S. Supreme Court (Source: CNN)
• First President to Encourage Racial Discrimination and Intimidation at Polling Places (the New Black Panthers voter intimidation case, Source: Investors Business Daily)
• First President to Refuse to Comply With a House Oversight Committee Subpoena (Source: Heritage Foundation)
• First President to Arbitrarily Declare an Existing Law Unconstitutional and Refuse to Enforce It (Defense of Marriage Act - Source: ABC News)
• First President to Demand a Company Hand Over $20 Billion to One of His Political Appointees (BP Oil Spill Relief Fund - Source: Fox News)
• First President to Have a Law Signed By an 'Auto-pen' Without Being "Present" (Source: The New York Times)
• First President to Have His Administration Fund an Organization Tied to the Cop-Killing Terrorist Group, the Weather Underground (Source: National Review)


• First President to publicly announce an enemies list (consisting of his opponents campaign contributors; and to use the instrumentalities of government to punish those on the list - Source: Heritage Foundation)
• First President to Attempt to Block Legally-Required 60-Day Layoff Notices by Government Contractors Due to His Own Cuts to Defense Spending -- Because The Notices Would Occur Before the Election. (Source: National Journal)
• First President to Intentionally Disable Credit Card Security Measures (in order to allow over-the-limit donations, foreign contributions and other illegal fundraising measures - Source: Power Line)
• First President to send 80 percent of a $16 billion program (green energy) to his campaign bundlers and contributors, leaving only 20% to those who did not contribute. (Source: Washington Examiner)
• First President to issue an Executive Order implementing a "Racial Justice System", a system that tries to achieve "racially equivalent outcomes" for crimes (Source: Daily Caller)
• First President to Send Millions in Taxpayer Dollars to His Wife's Former Employer (Source: White House Dossier)


• First President to Move America Past the Dependency Tipping Point, In Which 51% of Households Now Pay No Income Taxes (Source: Center for Individual Freedom)
• First President to Increase Food Stamp Spending By More Than 100% in Less Than Four Years (Source: Sen. Jeff Sessions)
• First President to Abrogate Bankruptcy Law to Turn Over Control of Companies to His Union Supporters (Source: Wall Street Journal)
• First President to Propose Budgets So Unreasonable That Not a Single Representative From Either Party Would Cast a Vote in Favor (Sources: The Hill, Open Market)
• First President Whose Economic Policies Have the Number of Americans on Disability Exceed the Population of New York (Source: CNS News)

• First President to Sign a Law Requiring All Americans to Purchase a Product From a Third Party (Source: Wall Street Journal)
• First President to Sue States For Enforcing Immigration Laws Passed by Congress (Source: The Arizona Republic newspaper)
• First President to See America Lose Its Status as the World's Largest Economy (Source: Peterson Institute)
• First President to Attempt to Bully a Major Manufacturing Company Into Not Opening a Factory in a Right-to-Work State (Boeing's facility in South Carolina - Source: Wall Street Journal)

Energy Policy

• First President to Endanger the Stability of the Electric Grid by Shutting Down Hundreds of Coal-Fired Plants Without Adequate Replacement Technologies (Source: National Electric Reliability Corporation - PDF)

National Security and World Affairs

• First President to Openly Defy a Congressional Order Not To Share Sensitive Nuclear Defense Secrets With the Russian Government (Sources: ABC News, Rep. Michael Turner)
• First President to send $200 million to a terrorist organization (Hamas) after Congress had explicitly frozen the money for fear it would fund attacks against civilians (Sources: American Thinker, The Independent [UK])


But remember: he will not rest until all Americans have jobs, affordable homes, green-energy vehicles, and the environment is repaired, etc., etc., etc.

You want to help stop this insanity? Send a few bucks to America's Comeback Team.

Daily Sanity says, Brace yourself, Civil War may be coming to America. My thoughts and my concerns, exactly.

DailySanity Newsletter from

Civil War In The U.S.? Brace Yourself

You have to hand it to Obama. At least he is keeping his promises.
July 02, 2008 – Colorado Springs, Colorado: Presidential candidate Barack Obama announces, “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
And now the Department of Homeland Security is busy purchasing bulletproof checkpoint booths; riot gear, hollow point bullets, and now sniper grade ammunition, among other things.
“This is tyranny, “ says Alex Jones at InfoWars.
Fax Congress Now!
In March of this year, the Department of Homeland Security purchased 450 million rounds of .40 caliber hollow point bullets, even though these types of bullets have been illegal in international warfare since 1899.
Since November of 2011, the DHS has purchased a total of 1.4 billion rounds of ammunition—and now they recently released a series of new purchase orders on the FedBizOpps website requesting over 2 million more rounds of sniper-grade ammo.
So ask yourself why the federal government is busy purchasing checkpoint booths, anti-radiation pills, and large assault vehicles, and why they are so vague and dismissive when someone presses them to explain why.
And, Join the Conversation on Facebook
Obama is nationalizing industries (automakers, the internet, healthcare) and going around Congress to impose his agenda (Net Neutrality, the Dream Act, cybersecurity). America is now paying the price for the “hope and change” propaganda of 2008.
And he is placing the DHS front and center as the Gestapo of the United States.
This is the same agency that gropes you at the airport (and steals your belongings with increasingly regularity); and they also released a report warning of radical groups in the U.S. comprised of Christians, war veterans, pro-life supporters and small government promoters.
Are conservatives now going to be labeled as “terrorists” by the Obama administration and singled out for destruction?
His administration has targeted many conservative individuals and groups for auditing; it is no reach to assume he will use the power of the government to stamp out any dissenters.
As Obama clears government agencies for firepower, he is working to take away our rights to bear arms and defend ourselves. Consider:
  • The Obama administration is working with the United Nations to disarm all Americans through the Small Arms Treaty.
  • He has used his corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder and his comrades at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms (ATF) to sell arms to Mexico in an effort to force Congress to limit our Second Amendment rights.
  • Under an expansion of the civil forfeiture doctrine, Obama has just given the ATF the power to seize your firearms if they choose to, without due process, and even if you are not under investigation. Under Obama’s new decree, if the ATF says they are going to confiscate your firearms, they can.
  • The draft cybersecurity order, which would place all activities on the Internet under the jurisdiction of the DHS, included gun control language, encouraged by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY). When that cybersecurity bill didn’t pass, Obama began drafting one of his own, which he plans to introduce by Executive Order, … will that EO contain limits on our Second Amendment right to bear arms?
If you weren’t already concerned about the power the Department of Homeland Security is amassing, you should be now—especially because we don’t have a President who respects the Constitution and the rights it gives us.
The ACLU made a Freedom of Information Act request and found that since 2009…during Obama’s entire presidential term…Justice Department spying on Americans has increased 64 percent.
Be aware that former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said that defeating terrorism will require the use of more “soft power,” meaning civilians will need to contribute more. And he wasn’t just touting Big Sis Janet Napolitano’s line of “see something, say something;” the Associated Press reported that he was calling for the “creation of new government organizations, including a permanent group of civilian experts with a wide range of expertise who could be sent abroad on short notice as a supplement to U.S. military efforts.”
The Department of Defense’s Civilian Expeditionary Workforce directive will establish that “soft power.”
Members of the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce shall be organized, trained, cleared, equipped, and ready to deploy in support of combat operations by the military; contingencies; emergency operations; humanitarian missions; disaster relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability operations of the Department of Defense in accordance with DoD 3000.05
This is not something that can be ignored!
The DHS continues to request more firepower, their reasons for doing so continue to be vague, and Obama continues to give them more control over our daily lives. All this as he ignores the corruption and scandal going on within the agency itself, which is overrun with criminal allegations and corruption!
We must, as Alex Jones at InfoWars urges, become like Paul Revere and expose the purchases the DHS is making, while we lean on Congress to stop this military-like behavior by a domestic agency. Our Constitution and our Bill of Rights must be defended against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
And, Join the Conversation on Facebook

Tony Adkins

Friday, September 28, 2012

A different view on that now famous 47% comment.

The problem with having a private speech recorded surreptitiously is that it doesn't provide for follow-up questions to clarify one's remarks. I am referring, of course, to the comments made by Mitt Romney about the 47% of Americans who will be voting for Democrats in general and Barack Hussein Obama in particular. At the outset I think that the word "Americans" should have been defined as "people who don't pay taxes". Now read the statement this way: "47% of people who don't pay taxes will be voting for Barack Obama". Sounds a bit different doesn't it? I happen to be one of those Americans who don't pay taxes BUT sure as hell am not in that 47% who would vote for Obama. I most certainly would never vote for any Democrat, especially one with Obama's treasonous reputation for his associations with known communists and terrorists. 
I don't pay taxes because I have no Earned Income. I am 72 years old and have been retired for 11 years and have only a pension check and a Social Security check coming in every month and these two sources of funds are not taxable. By some accounts I may be considered in the low-income class but I manage to get by with what I have because I paid off my mortgage a long time ago. I also do not collect Food Stamps or any other free stuff from the government. I didn't write the tax laws and neither did Mitt Romney. He pays the taxes he owes based on the law. That cannot be said for some of the officials in Obama's administration who failed to pay the taxes they owed the government.

I am not making excuses for Mitt Romney's lack of clarity in a private meeting of his supporters. I was prompted into writing this after reading a story on Fox News about a video of a black woman who was boasting about her free Obama cell phone. It then  became clear how widespread the numbers are of people who don't pay taxes.
In 2008, there were 7.1 million Lifeline accounts nationwide. There are 12.5 million today, according to Bloomberg News. About half of those are mobile phones sold by Miami-based TracFone, Sprint and hundreds of smaller regional companies. The government pays those carriers up to $10 per month for each program subscriber. Users, in turn, get free phones and 250 minutes of monthly airtime.
The fact that there were 12.5 million free cell phones four years ago paid for by the Federal government in the hands of low income people certainly gives weight to the thought that these people would want to vote for Obama if they were made to believe he alone was responsible for them. In light of our dismal Democrat-created economy, there are probably a whole lot more free phones out there today. Read the whole story here  but while the first two paragraphs tell it all, the video carries all of the fervent emotion.
 Protester outside of Romney rally explains how Obama gives all minorities free phones and that is why they should vote for him. Cleveland Ohio, September 26, 2012
Viral video touting free 'Obama phone' puts spotlight on federal program
A viral video of an Obama supporter touting her “Obama phone” has put the spotlight on an obscure federal program that provides discounted phone service to qualifying low-income Americans.
“Keep Obama as president,” the animated woman says on the video. “He gave us a phone.”
It matters not that the free cell phone program was in place years before Obama stole the White House. What is important is that many of those in the 47% group who don't pay taxes, the ones on Welfare and live in government housing projects, get free medical care and collect Food Stamps have been made to believe that Obama is the source of their great free gifts. And I'm sure that many Democrats have spread the word that a Republican administration along with a Republican dominated Congress would certainly cut that estimated 2-billion dollar cell phone giveaway program to save money. While history tells us that it was the Republicans under Abraham Lincoln who freed the slaves it was the Democrats who created the KKK to intimidate the Black people and later on created the Welfare programs to make them dependent on Democrats to keep the free stuff coming their way and all they were expected to do was return the favor and vote for them. And the votes keep coming in, even after they die.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides


Thursday, September 27, 2012

Media Research Center finds that major news outlets are biased toward Obama and other Democrats. Sign the petition to voice your protest.

Everyone knows that liberals own the news networks. They also own most of the entertainment industry, too, so pro-Obama bias has been creeping into our living rooms from far too many TV shows.Some broadcaster/journalists have actually been seen reading from prepared scripts sent out by left-wing propaganda sources. Now a well-respected research group has offered proof of the leftist bias being broadcast across the airwaves. This 2012 election year has been bringing the liberals to a state of euphoria in their attempts to reelect their Marxist/Socialist Democrat hero Barack Hussein Obama. It has also brought the same news media to the point of exhaustion in their non-stop attempts to cover up every bad story that tarnishes their hero's reputation. FOX News has this story.
The big three broadcast networks devoted dozens of stories last week to Mitt Romney's supposed "47 percent" gaffe but gave just a fraction of that air time to covering an audio tape of controversial remarks by President Obama, according to the Media Research Center.

The MRC examined how much total air time each story got last week and found coverage of the Romney remarks overpowered coverage of the Obama remarks by a 13-1 ratio.

The center found that ABC, CBS and NBC - on their evening and morning shows -- spent 88 minutes and 42 total stories on Romney. They spent six and a half minutes and eight stories on Obama.
Here is the letter from the Media Research Center and the link to the petition just issued by them. Please click this link to sign the petition.

Join Rush Limbaugh - Sign Brent Bozell's
Open Letter to the Media

This election year so much of the broadcast networks, their cable counterparts, and the major establishment print media are out of control with a deliberate and unmistakable leftist agenda.

There is a reason why the media are viewed with such disdain by the American public, as evidenced by every recent poll on the issue.

That's why it's vital for you to join the over twenty conservative leaders including Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, Mark Levin, and Ed Meese III in signing MRC President Brent Bozell's open letter to the media calling them out for their deliberate and calculated attempts to rig the 2012 presidential election.

After you sign the letter, please chip in a tax-deductible donation so MRC can continue to expose and neutralize liberal media bias.
The Letter States:
This election year, so much of the broadcast networks, their cable counterparts, and the major establishment print media are out of control with a deliberate and unmistakable leftist agenda. To put it bluntly: you are rigging this election and taking sides in order to pre-determine the outcome. In the quarter century since the Media Research Center was established to document liberal media bias, there has never been a more brazen and complete attempt by the liberal so-called "news" media to decide the outcome of an election. 
A free and balanced media are crucial to the health of this country. It is your duty as journalists - as outlined in the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics - to "distinguish between advocacy and news reporting," while simultaneously "seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues."
There is a reason why the media are viewed with such disdain by the American public, as evidenced by every recent poll on the issue.
You have breached the public trust by willfully turning a blind eye to the government's public policy failures, both domestic and foreign, while openly and shamefully smearing Gov. Mitt Romney. You are:

  • Painting conservative ideas as extreme, while refusing to report the disastrous consequences of liberal programs enacted since 2008.
  • Submerging the truly horrendous economic conditions America is facing and focusing only on minor political issues.
  • Characterizing conservatives as cruel budget "slashers" instead of responsible officials trying to avoid a debt catastrophe.
  • Focusing on alleged shortcomings in Romney's business record instead of Obama's record as the chief executive, whose policies contributed to a failed economy.
  • Deliberately covering up embarrassing government failures and scandals, including the Solyndra debacle, Fast & Furious, and national security leaks which have put American lives in jeopardy.
  • Pouncing on real and perceived missteps by conservatives, portraying them as bumbling incompetents, while suppressing embarrassing and incendiary remarks made by Vice President Joe Biden to prevent him from becoming a liability.
  • Portraying conservative opposition to tax hikes as an impediment to deficit reduction while failing to highlight how liberal tax increase policies will cause massive damage to the economy and cause the deficit to explode.
  • "Fact-checking" conservatives in order to discredit their arguments while regularly refusing to "fact-check" liberals who are distorting the truth.
We the undersigned – representing millions of Americans from our respective organizations – are now publicly urging our members to seek out alternative sources of political news in order to make an intelligent, well-informed decision on November 6.
It is time the American people turn you who are offending off, once and for all. You have betrayed their trust.

L. Brent Bozell, III 
Media Research Center
Gary Bauer
Campaign for American Values
Kenneth Blackwell
Hon.J. Kenneth Blackwell
Former, U.S. ambassador
U.N. Human Rights Commission

Morton Blackwell,
The Weyrich Lunch

David Bozell
Executive Director
For America

Brian Brown
National Organization for Marriage

Al Cardenas
American Conservative Union

Colin Hanna
Let Freedom Ring

Laura Ingraham
National Radio Host

Matt Kibbe
President and CEO

Amy Kremer
Tea Party Express

Curt Levey
Committee for Justice

Mark Levin
Author and National Radio Host

Rush Limbaugh
National Radio Host

Jenny Beth Martin
Tea Party Patriots

Ed Meese III
Ronald Reagan Distinguished Fellow in Public Policy,
Chairman of the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies
Heritage Foundation

Mike Needham
Chief Executive Officer
Heritage Action

Karl Otteson
U. S. Federation of Small Businesses Inc

William Pascoe
Executive Vice President
Citizens for the Republic

Tony Perkins
Family Research Council

Alfred S. Regnery
Paul Revere Project

Mathew D. Staver
Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel

Richard Viguerie


Sunday, September 23, 2012

A very scary thought: Conservative Christians Will Give Obama Second Term

I got this in an email from the Northern Kentucky Tea Party. If the writer is correct in thinking conservatives may not want to vote for Mitt Romney because he is not a Christian then we are in big trouble. And this is something we all need to talk to our friends about, just in case they might feel the same way. There is no margin for error in the November elections. Either we throw Barack Hussein Obama and his corrupt, Godless Marxist/Socialist anti-American cohorts out of office or we face the real probability that our Constitutional Republic will cease to exist. That means the end of our Bill of Rights, including no more Second Amendment, no more Free Speech, no more Right to Assembly, no more Liberty.
The pols are showing a tight race, so every conservative, no matter what your religious convictions may be, has got to go out and vote for every Republican on the ballot, including Mitt Romney. If you even think about voting for a third-party candidate out of protest you must understand that by denying Romney your vote you WILL be voting for Barack Hussein Obama because any vote not going to Romney is a vote for Obama. And one more thought, to ensure our Liberty we must also elect a veto-proof Congress with a solid Republican majority, just in case Obama wins.
Conservative Christians Will Give Obama Second Term
As conservative Christian, I would love nothing more than to be able to vote for a Christian president.  I know of many other conservative Christians who feel the same way.  And because of their faith and convictions, they may well give Barack Obama a second term as president and insure the complete collapse of America.
I’ve heard a number of friends say that they will not vote for Obama or Romney because neither of them are Christian.  They either intend to vote for Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, or a write-in candidate that is a Christian or not vote at all.  I’ve tried to explain to them that by throwing their votes to anyone other than Romney will only serve to improve Obama’s chances of winning re-election.
Sadly, they counter with the statement that if all Christians voted this way, it would make a difference.  The fact is, not all Christians will vote this way and no one other than Obama or Romney stand a chance of winning the election.  Taking their votes away from Romney will only help Obama.
Even though Romney is a Mormon and Johnson a Christian, Romney favors more Christian values than Johnson does.  Gary Johnson professes to be a Lutheran, but he favors and endorses abortion and same-sex marriage.  Johnson also endorses the legalization of marijuana.  Romney is against abortion, same-sex marriage and the legalization of marijuana.
However, it seems that none of this matters to some conservative Christians.  All they care about is voting for a Christian, regardless of how liberal his values and morals are.  My response to them on this issue is to consider that God used Rahab, a non-Hebrew prostitute to save the Hebrew spies that Joshua sent to spy out the Promised Land that God promised His people.  God also used Balaam’s ass to keep him from certain destruction.  If God can use a prostitute and an ass to save His people, then I’m sure He could use a Mormon to help save America.
On the converse, I seriously doubt that God would bless America if we re-elect a Muslim leader whose religion promotes the complete destruction and annihilation of Christians worldwide.  If you don’t believe it, just look at how much of His blessing He has pulled away from America during the reign of Obama.  The more our nation embraces Obama’s heathen ways, especially the endorsement of same-sex marriage and the further removal of all things Christian, the more God has turned His blessings into judgments.
If conservative Christians do not vote for Mitt Romney, it greatly increases the chances of Obama’s re-election and the further removal of God’s blessings.  More Obama means more of God’s judgment and I’m not sure how much more judgment America can stand before we can stand no longer and fall into ruin.


Saturday, September 22, 2012

Why Mitt Romney is Unlikable!

This is circulating on the Canadian computer emails. Thought you might like to read it.
 A lot is being said in the media about Mitt Romney not being "likable" or that he doesn't "relate well" to people. Frankly, we struggled to understand why. So after much research, we have come up with a Top Ten List to explain this "un-likabliity."
Top Ten Reasons To Dislike Mitt Romney: 
1. Drop-dead, collar-ad handsome with gracious, statesmanlike aura. Looks like every central casting's #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief. 
2. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her, including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS. 
3. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?) 
4. Can't speak in a fake, southern, "black preacher voice" when necessary. 
5. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School...and by the way, his academic records are NOT sealed. 
6. Doesn't smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs, not even in the counter-culture age when he went to college. Too square for today's America?

7. Represents an America of "yesterday", where people believed in God, went to Church, didn't screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!
8. Has a family of five great sons....and none of them have police records or are in drug rehab. But of course, they were raised by a stay-at-home mom, and that "choice" deserves America's scorn. 
*9. Oh yes.....he's a MORMON. We need to be very afraid of that very strange religion that teaches its members to be clean-living, patriotic, fiscally conservative, charitable, self-reliant, and honest. 
10. And one more point.....pundits say because of his wealth, he can't relate to ordinary Americans. I guess that's because he made that money opposed to marrying it or inheriting it from Dad. Apparently, he didn't understand that actually working at a job and earning your own money made you unrelatable to Americans. 
* Why is being a Mormon considered a thing of concern, but being a Muslum isn't? More weirdness! 
My goodness, it's a strange world, isn't it? 
            Personal Information:
            His full Name is: Willard Mitt Romney
            He was Born: March 12, 1947 and is 65 years old.

            His Father: George W. Romney, former Governor
            of the State of Michigan.

            He was raised in Bloomfield Hills , Michigan.

            He is Married to Ann Romney since 1969; they five children.

            B.A. from Brigham Young University,

            J.D. and M.B.A. from Harvard University

            Mormon - The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints

            Working Background:
            After high school, he spent 30 months in France as a Mormon missionary.

            After going to both Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School simultaneously, he passed the Michigan bar exam, but never worked as an attorney.

            In 1984, he co-founded Bain Capital a private equity investment firm, one of the largest such firms in the United States.

            In 1994, he ran for Senator of Massachusetts and lost to Ted Kennedy.

            He was President and CEO of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games.

            In 2002, he was elected Governor of the State of Massachusetts where he eliminated a 1.5 billion deficit.

            Some Interesting Facts about Romney:

            Bain Capital, starting with one small office supply store in Massachusetts, turned it into Staples; now over 2,000 stores employing 90,000 people.

            Bain Capital also worked to perform the same kinds of business miracles again and again, with companies like Domino's, Sealy, Brookstone, Weather Channel, Burger King, Warner Music Group, Dollarama, Home Depot Supply and many others.

            He was an unpaid volunteer campaign worker for his dad's gubernatorial campaign 1 year.

            He was an unpaid intern in his dad's governor's office for eight years.

            He was an unpaid bishop and state president of his church for ten years.

            He was an unpaid President of the Salt Lake Olympic Committee for three years.

            He took no salary and was the unpaid Governor of Massachusetts for four years.

            He gave his entire inheritance from his father to charity.

            Mitt Romney is one of the wealthiest self-made men in our country but has given more back to its citizens in terms of money, service and time than most men.

            And in 2011 Mitt Romney gave over $4 million to charity, almost 19% of his income.... Just for comparison purposes,

            Obama gave 1% and Joe Biden gave $300 or .0013%.

            Mitt Romney is Trustworthy:

            He will show us his birth certificate

            He will show us his high school and college transcripts.

            He will show us his social security card.

            He will show us his law degree.

            He will show us his draft notice.

            He will show us his medical records.

            He will show us his income tax records.

            He will show us he has nothing to hide.

            Mitt Romney's background, experience and trustworthiness show him to be a great leader and an excellent citizen for President of the United States.

            You may think that Romney may not be the best representative the Republicans could have selected. At least I know what religion he is, and that he won't desecrate the flag, bow down to foreign powers, or practice fiscal irresponsibility. I know he has the ability to turn this financial debacle that the current regime has gotten us into. We won't like all the things necessary to recover from this debt, but someone with Romney's background can do it. But, on the minus side, he never was a "Community Organizer", never took drugs or smoked pot, never got drunk, did not associate with communists or terrorists, nor did he attend a church whose pastor called for God to damn the US.


From Atlas Shrugs: CNN cuts off interview with Pamela Geller when facts come out about CAIR.

The following headline and transcript was copied from Jihad Watch. The left-wing news media does not want the public to hear any concise, fact-based arguments that contradict their propaganda. Here is a perfect example.

Pamela Geller on CNN: Segment abruptly cut when she started speaking about Hamas-linked CAIR

Last night, CNN's Erin Burnett cut my interview short when I began to discuss Hamas-CAIR and its co-conspirator status in the largest terrorist funding trial in our nation's history. I secretly recorded the whole interview and posted it along with the video today. It went viral. 

In response, CNN has released the whole video on YouTube. Good. But it's certainly not the same thing as airing it.
What an interesting place to end the interview -- just a coincidence, I'm sure! But it actually didn't end there. Pamela Geller has the story:
Here is the video of my interview with Erin Burnett on CNN earlier. The video cuts off at the end of the description of the ADL. Here is a transcript of the portion that CNN didn't run. I secretly recorded my interview and included the audio of the missing portion in the video as well. The interview was 14 minutes long, but CNN cuts it off at discussion of Hamas-CAIR, 9 minutes in. Much thanks to Big Fur Hat for dropping the secretly recorded audio of the entire interview into the video above.
This is what CNN's Erin Burnett censored:
PG: And CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood group --

EB: That is the organization, right, Council on American-Islamic Relations, they said these are hate ads and part of a larger problem.

PG: CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist funding trial in our nation’s history. They were named as Muslim Brotherhood. They’re a Hamas group in America. Hamas is – the first paragraph of their charter calls for the annihilation of Israel. Is CAIR ever gonna support me and support freedom? Of course not. They’re not -- to me, they’re not a legitimate group. To me they’re a subversive group whose stated goal, according to an internal captured document in the Holy Land trial, was to eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within. So that is a compliment. Seriously.

EB: OK, let me ask you about this issue about savages again, because I think that is part of the problem here. At least -- when people look at that ad -- it is a word chosen – will you admit this? – to make people recoil and pay attention.

PG: No.

EB: To poke up. To perk up and say, Look at this.

PG: No, it’s an accurate word. The definition of savage works, because any war on innocent civilians is savagery. Would you call those that beheaded a colleague, Daniel Pearl, savages?

EB: I would call them murderers.

PG: You wouldn’t call them savages? I would. I would call them savages. I would call Nazis, that slaughtered millions and millions of Jews and gypsies and homosexuals, I would call them savages. So I think now it’s not arbitrary: I think when you go to a dictionary and you look up what savage means, and that’s the definition –

EB: Uncivilized and barbarous.

PG: That’s right.

EB: So lemme ask you something else. When people see your name, you are a controversial person, which I know that you say that you’re not, but you are. I’m gonna say that I think that that is the case.

PG: You’re allowed, you’re allowed.

EB: All right. You have done other things as well. Obviously, as I mentioned, you were against the Ground Zero Mosque.

PG: I was against the Ground Zero Mosque.

EB: You have questioned the authenticity of President Barack Obama being born in the United States.

PG: No, that’s not true. That is absolutely not true. I ran a digital forensic examination calling into questions alterations that were made to the Certification of Live Birth. I don’t know what’s on the long form. I don’t know what’s on the vault copy. But I did say – and I didn’t say it, an actual digital forensic examination specialist said, there were alterations made to the original COLB. All I said was, What’s on the original vault copy that he doesn’t want us to know? That was all I said. Now, they change it, and they morph it – listen, I’ve written hundreds of articles. Two books. I update Atlas Shrugs, my blog, every day. You don’t have to guess as to my position. There’s no ambiguity to my position. You can read me.

EB: You said the president was a Muslim.

PG: I never said that. I never said he was a Muslim. I said, whether he is or he isn’t, what would he be doing differently? And--

EB: But isn’t that – but see, that, this -- these are the rhetorical games that one can play. Saying that let’s look into a digital forensic of an American citizen’s birth certificate is calling into question whether they were born here. Saying whether you are or aren’t a Muslim when you’ve been very passionate about your Christian faith is raising the question of someone, whether someone is or isn’t a Muslim, as if somehow being a Muslim is perceived as being negative.

PG: But you’re accusing me of something I never said. Let’s discuss what I said. I’m happy to discuss everything that I said. The same thing with Barack Obama. I don’t know what’s on the vault copy. Every other president has released the vault except him. It makes you question. Now you’re gonna say, “Pamela, you’re not allowed to question.” This is America. I can question. And frankly, I still think it’s a question. I do, I think it’s a question. And I do think that Obama is Islamophilic – yes, that’s what I said. I didn’t say he was a Muslim. There’s no way to know what’s in the man’s heart. And frankly, by their fruits ye shall know them, so we know him. I don’t know what’s in his heart, and I don’t care.

EB: The Center for American Progress calls you an “Islamophobia grass roots organizer.”

PG: Yeah. And American Center for Progress is an uber left-wing, Soros-funded, subversive organization. I mean, these are not legitimate organizations if you’re a rational, thinking person that loves individual rights, that believes in individual rights over statism, that believes in individual rights over collectivism. I’m sorry, but these are not legitimate organizations.

EB: Who you gonna vote for?

PG: Really? I’m voting for President Romney. So here we go: Geller Endorses Romney, there’s your headline!