Two stories here to place the subject in contrast. First off is a commentary on the DOJ working with the Holy Land Foundation terrorist funding trial unindicted co-conspirator Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the pro-communist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to threaten First Amendment Freedom of Speech Rights against anyone who writes uncomplimentary stories about Muslims. The second story is a recap of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Westboro Baptist Church lawsuit who ruled that even hateful speech is a protected right. As Robert Barnes wrote in the Washington Post on March 3, 2011,
The First Amendment protects a fringe church's anti-gay protests at military funerals, a nearly unanimous Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in a powerful opinion that spoke to the nation's tolerance for even hateful public speech.
The court's most liberal and most conservative justices joined in a decision likely to define the term. It writes a new chapter in the court's findings that freedom of speech is so central to the nation that it protects cruel and unpopular protests - even, in this case, at the moment of a family's most profound grief.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that Westboro Baptist Church's picketing at fallen soldiers' funerals "is certainly hurtful and its contribution to public discourse may be negligible." But he said the reaction may not be "punishing the speaker."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
People Power Against the Department of Justice
By: Cliff Kincaid
Accuracy in Media
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and its allies, the Council on
American Islamic Relations and the Southern Poverty Law Center, are on
the defensive after thousands of people turned out in Tennessee on
Tuesday night to protest a scheme to censor criticism of Islam.
The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a key component of a
network of Muslim Brotherhood organizations in the U.S., called the
turnout a “mob” and praised the Obama/Holder Justice Department for
standing up to local residents.
CAIR said “a large group of protesters heckled and interrupted
speeches by Bill Killian, U.S. Attorney of the Eastern District of
Tennessee, and by Kenneth Moore, FBI special agent in charge of the
Eastern Tennessee District.”
In fact, the DOJ had provoked the reaction by announcing beforehand
that people using the Internet to criticize Muslims might be prosecuted
for civil rights violations and that the meeting on “public discourse in
a free society” in Tennessee would examine this alleged problem.
Killian had announced
in advance that he would address “how civil rights can be violated by
those who post inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims on social
media.”
In order to explain how the censorship campaign would work, Killian
and the local FBI agent, Kenneth Moore, had worked with the American
Muslim Advisory Council (AMAC) to schedule the event at the
Manchester-Coffee County Conference Center in Manchester, Tennessee, on
the night of June 4.
The center was completely filled, however, and hundreds more had to
rally outside, where Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, who co-founded
Stop Islamization of Nations (SION), spoke to the crowd. Videos show Geller and Spencer rallying the people on behalf of freedom of expression.
“I talked with many of the people who had driven hours to get to the
rally—a farmer and his son, an orthodox Jewish family, World War II
veterans and many more,” said James Lafferty, chairman of the Virginia
Anti-Shariah Task Force (VAST), who was on the scene. “They all said the
same thing—the Justice Department is trying to curtail free speech by
promising increased scrutiny of any Internet posts which mention Islam.”
He said the angry reactions inside the conference center followed “a heavy dose of jihadist propaganda by the AMAC folks.”
He explained, “A long video
about Islam in Shelbyville, Tennessee, followed the usual B movie story
line—Muslims come to town, ignorant locals react badly. Muslims
demonstrate that they are honorable and just, ignorant locals and
Muslims are now the best of friends and there is a lesson here for
anyone else who doubts Islam’s noble intentions.”
He said the film footage of a few angry people at the June 4 event
“gave the stereotypical ‘angry mob’ scenario for the hostile media,” but
that Killian’s presentation was itself “very condescending and
provocative” because of the implication that local residents had no
right to complain about the spread of radical Islam in their state.
An Islamic Center in Chattanooga, Tennessee features “Strong Islamic studies,” a term that implies Sharia, or Islamic law.
Lafferty said it was entirely predictable that when Killian mentioned
the name of the Attorney General, Eric Holder, who is neck-deep in
several scandals, people in the audience booed. “Every mention of Holder
had the same effect,” he noted.
Killian’s speech, Lafferty said, was that “Muslims are misunderstood
and they are no different than you or me” and any criticism of Islam is
“hate-mongering and bigotry.”
“The biggest story of the event was the crowd,” Lafferty said. While
some people were angry and animated in their reactions to Killian’s
lecture on “hate crimes,” he said there was intimate knowledge of
Islamic practices and that when Muslim speakers at the podium with
Killian talked about Islam as a peaceful religion which valued good
citizenship, people interrupted with the word “takiya,” a reference to
the Islamic concept of deception.
However, CAIR and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) insisted
that local residents, as well as Geller and Spencer, were at fault for
reacting to the DOJ campaign against the First Amendment. This became
the story line of much of the coverage of the event.
The SPLC works hand-in-glove with the Obama/Holder Justice Department, smearing opponents of radical Islam as “Islamophobes.”
But Lafferty of VAST said the focus was “that a special meeting was
being conducted to talk about the Department of Justice’s commitment to
protect the rights of one religious group—Islam.”
Lafferty and others question why the Justice Department has singled
out Muslims for special protection and that such a practice reflects
adherence to Sharia, or Islamic law, over and above American law and the
Constitution.
He noted that the DOJ based this meeting on the fact that a local
Tennessee politician had posted a stupid gag on Facebook about targeting
Muslims, and that the incident was “being used as the pushing off point
for Justice to scrutinize every statement about Islam on the Internet.”
“Both Pamela Geller and the incomparable Robert Spencer spoke
brilliantly about free speech and the threat posed to it by government
suppression,” Lafferty said.
Cliff Kincaid is the Director of the AIM Center for Investigative Journalism and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Westboro Baptist Church Wins Supreme Court Appeal Over Funeral Protests
MARK SHERMAN
03/02/11 09:34 PM ET
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a grieving
father's pain over mocking protests at his Marine son's funeral must
yield to First Amendment protections for free speech. All but one
justice sided with a fundamentalist church that has stirred outrage with
raucous demonstrations contending God is punishing the military for the
nation's tolerance of homosexuality.
The 8-1 decision in favor of the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka,
Kan., was the latest in a line of court rulings that, as Chief Justice
John Roberts said in his opinion for the court, protects "even hurtful
speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate."
The decision ended a lawsuit by Albert Snyder, who sued
church members for the emotional pain they caused by showing up at his
son Matthew's funeral. As they have at hundreds of other funerals, the
Westboro members held signs with provocative messages, including "Thank
God for dead soldiers," `'You're Going to Hell," `'God Hates the
USA/Thank God for 9/11," and one that combined the U.S. Marine Corps
motto, Semper Fi, with a slur against gay men.
Read more here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/02/westboro-baptist-church-w_n_830209.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The first story above mentions the showing of a pro-Muslim propaganda film about Shelbyville, Tennessee as some lame attempt to cover the issue with white-wash, but it gives no details about why this particular town was of any consequence. Well, maybe I should remind my readers about this story that I posted 2 1/2 years ago. Now wouldn't it be of some concern to everyone who either lived in Shelbyville or was a consumer of Tyson Chicken products if some Muslim workers wrote "All Americans must die." on a factory wall? So why would public discussion about this be inflammatory?
The second story shows the extent of importance given to our First Amendment Free Speech Rights by the U.S. Supreme Court who ruled that even hateful speech is a protected right.
Every piece of good journalism is supposed to begin with
an opening paragraph that identifies the important elements related to
the story: Who, what, where, when and why. Without these details it is
impossible to fully understand or grasp the entire picture. Case in
point, the Tyson Chicken plant in Shelbyville, Tennessee. In the past
few years the Tyson Chicken plant has hired a large number of Somali
immigrants and these workers are predominantly Muslim. The workers began
to demand accommodations for their Muslim religion and Tyson agreed to
allow them time off to celebrate the Muslim holidays. Tyson Chicken in
Shelbyville went out of its way to be accommodating to its Muslim
employees in 2008, when it adopted Eid al-Fitr as an official plant
holiday.
The NBC affiliate station, WSMV-TV Channel 4 News reported this story today. 10:49am | December 25, 2010
'All Americans Must Die' Written On Plant Wall
Threatening Graffiti Provokes Extra Tyson Security
Reported By Deanna Lambert
The Shelbyville chief of police and a former Tyson employee confirmed
that threatening messages surfaced this week, leading to extra security
at the plant.
"A couple days ago, they had a terrorist threat that was written on the
bathroom walls that said 'all Americans must die,'" said a woman, who
said she wanted to remain anonymous to protect her relative, who works
inside the plant.
"They've complained for years, as to why these people are being hired in
our food department when we are worried about our safety as Americans,
you know, and that's something we all need to think about," she said.
Of
course, in our age of political correctness, this story did not mention
anything specific about the workers nationality or religion so the
point about a terrorist message seems a little confusing. A careful
search of the Internet reveals there have been other stories warning
about terrorist activity in food related areas and all of them have left
out some missing critical pieces of information.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No foreign language comments allowed. English only. If you cannot access the comments window send me an email at Oldironsides@fuse.net.