From the time the Pilgrims arrived on American soil, faith in God played an important part in shaping our nation. Images of Moses adorn the Supreme Court in recognition of the Judeo-Christian origin of our laws. But it was Taxes, loss of Liberty and oppression from a mad king that led our Founding Fathers to write The Declaration of Independence and start The American Revolution. Today, those who stand for these ideals no longer call themselves The Silent Majority because we are silent no more.
But not for Glen Greenwald from POLITICO, who must have been living under a a rock for most of his life.
For Greenwald its not Muslims, its us - who are “creating
a radically different — and more oppressive — set of rules, laws and
punishments for a class of people in the United States based on their
religious affiliation is a disgrace of historic proportion.”
For Greenwald, Sami al Arian is a victim of American injustice.
As predicted in this article, CAIR and its gullible
allies forgot all about Shaima Alawadi after it turned out that her
murder was related to her own family.
Dwight Schultz, Georgette Gelbard and Tommi Trudeau recently joined
The Glazov Gang to discuss Why The Left Abandoned Shaima Alawadi — a
murdered Muslim woman whom the media and progressives professed immense
concern for when they thought she was killed by an “Islamophobe.” Now
that it turns out that she was killed by a member of her own family, the Left has abruptly lost all interest in Shaima Alawadi.
Everywhere in the world it is the same: demands for
“rights,” leading to an increasingly separate cultural and political
identity, demands for accommodation of Sharia, and inevitably,
increasing conflict.
“Muslims demand separate identity in new constitution,” from the Himalayan News Service, April 16
Greenwald really needs a dose of Muselmanic diversity:
Diversity: They Drive Us Out, We Invite Them In(Gatestone)
“Islamic countries have become more Islamic because of a
deliberate policy that drives non-Muslims out; non-Islamic countries
have become more Islamic because of a deliberate policy that invites
Muslims in.”
So, consider their most compelling argument: Muslims must not recognize any form of government not instituted by Allah. I think it's time we said, lets start demanding a loyalty oath to OUR Constitution and OUR laws if you want to live here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No foreign language comments allowed. English only. If you cannot access the comments window send me an email at Oldironsides@fuse.net.
This blog site uses cookies from Google and from Stat Counter to analyze visitor traffic. The only information captured by these stat counters are your IP address along with your city, state and country. The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires this notice. If you don't want this information recorded you should leave now and don't come back.
My name is Nelson Abdullah. I am 77-years old and after 40 years of working for two major airlines, I retired 15 years ago in 2002, a few months after the 9-11 attack on America. My wife and I have been married for more than 56 years. We celebrated our Golden Anniversary in April 2010.
My wife and I are both lifelong Catholics and registered Republicans.
Our country was created as a Constitutional Republic, a nation of laws, held together by the fabric of the Constitution. The Constitution limits the powers of the government while the first ten amendments, called The Bill of Rights, guarantee the rights of We The People. Defending the Republic.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” —The Declaration of Independence—July 4th, 1776.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No foreign language comments allowed. English only. If you cannot access the comments window send me an email at Oldironsides@fuse.net.