Sunday, April 29, 2012

NEWSMAX: Obama to tout attack on Osama bin Laden.

Just read this account on Newsmax about Obama getting ready to take credit for the Navy SEAL Team 6's successful take down of Osama bin Laden and I recalled seeing a picture made up by one of Barack Hussein Obama's admirers during his 2008 campaign. I've added my own caption to the picture below. I have only quoted one key paragraph from the Newsmax story but this should set the tone for the rest of the 2012 campaign. In spite of Barack Hussein Obama's close ties to radical Muslims and communists, he will be portrayed in the following months as an all-American super hero.

"I would have done it myself personally but I was too busy planing my next vacation."

Obama to Open Situation Room to Tout bin Laden Attack

Saturday, 28 Apr 2012 10:03 AM
By Dave Eberhart

As Obama opens the secretive White House Situation Room as an interview stage to hail the one-year anniversary, the broader goal for the president is not to just to remind voters of an enormous victory on his watch, it is to maximize a political narrative that he has the courage to make tough calls that his opponent might not.
And this just in from Move America Forward:
OBAMA GOES BACK TO CLAIMING CREDIT
ONE YEAR AFTER SEALS KILLED OSAMA BIN LADEN
 
In just a few days we will mark the 1 year anniversary of the day our Navy SEALs tracked down and took out the terrorist leader Osama bin Laden. But President Obama, in an election year, with sagging poll numbers, desperate for a boost, has taken again to claiming credit for the success of our troops.

Obama has used the rarefied setting of the Situation Room to give an interview about how he made the decision to send in Special Operations forces. Vice President Joe Biden gave a speech saying the re-election slogan would be "Bin Laden is dead and General Motors is alive." The president’s campaign released a Web video showing former President Bill Clinton praising Obama’s fortitude, as it questioned whether Mitt Romney would have made the same decision.
- NY TIMES  4/28/2012

OBAMA IS PRACTICING THE SAME TYPE OF BUMPER-STICKER
POLITICS THAT HE ALWAYS CRITICIZES. SHAMEFULLY TRYING TO SCORE POLITICAL POINTS FROM WHAT OUR TROOPS ACCOMPLISHED .


Pathological Politics – Predatory Partners and Persecuting Patriots

From Terresa Monroe-Hamilton's Noisy Room
Reposted with permission.

Pathological Politics – Predatory Partners and Persecuting Patriots

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton





In the notorious tradition of Nixon’s Enemies List, Obama is now openly persecuting patriots at every opportunity. He tries to shame them, taint them, marginalize them and if all that doesn’t work, he sends goons after them and either imprisons them or threatens them with imprisonment. He’s using every agency at his disposal, with a special emphasis on the EPA, FDA, IRS, SEC, ATF and Fish and Wildlife authorities. And he has hired a whole governmental ‘army’ to enforce his dictates and go after his enemies. Welcome to the American Stasi.
We have watched how Obama smears those who would dare to donate to Mitt Romney’s campaign. That should make us want to donate even more, not back down and cower in fear. We all know that Obama is determined to be reelected legally or illegally – he doesn’t care. He just wants to hold on to his power, so he can finish what he started – destroying America with his pathological politics of corruption, greed and evil. If the elections don’t suffice, he’ll invent an emergency to ensure his death grip on the throat of America.
Look at how Gibson Guitars has been treated. They have been raided multiple times, but they can’t defend themselves because in the last three years, this administration won’t say what crime they are charging them with. They are destroying a good and honest company that creates jobs and does business production here in America. Their crime – successful capitalism. Something Obama will not tolerate.
Then there are farmers. The EPA is clamping down on the Amish and others who don’t follow every regulation in an effort to put them out of business and it is working. I hear the stealthy, sly footsteps of Cass Sunstein. Soon, very soon, the government will control all our farmland and food. Then if you step out of line, they’ll just starve you to death. Farming on your own property will be illegal. It’s coming – bet on it. Right now they are seizing farmer’s bank accounts. The FDA is now using the terrorist based “Bank Secrecy Act” as justification to invade, investigate and even confiscate the bank accounts of Americans in the agricultural business.
From The Examiner:
The Bank Secrecy Act that came out of the events of 9/11, which has been expanded during the decade long war on terror, is now being used to criminally attack farmers who choose not to use banks as their sole or primary source for monetary transactions. This is especially relevant after the credit crisis of 2008, where many American[s] began withdrawing money from banks after bank solvency came into question.
This banking law, which allows for the unwarranted confiscation and seizure of funds based solely on perceived impropriety, is one of many new policies created under the Bush and Obama administrations to control the public, and the flow of money in the United States. Beginning in 2013, new capital controls are set to be implemented which will make it extremely difficult to move dollars in and out of the country, and more recently, the Obama administration diverted funds from other departments to hire thousands of IRS agents for the new healthcare system that will also commence in 2013.

Ted Nugent on Regulations
 
Glenn Beck – We Are All Criminals Now
 Now, we turn to Ted Nugent, who has been all over the news as of late. Evidently Obama has had Ted Nugent in his sights for at least two years and probably much longer. Nugent was charged with breaking a law – of which the judge hadn’t even heard – while hunting black bear in Alaska. But you can bet the Feds did and they brought charges hoping to snare Nugent. But that didn’t work out as they intended – Nugent accepted that he ‘unknowingly’ broke the law and the sentence carried the same weight as jaywalking, a misdemeanor offense. They tried to snag him in California and accused him of baiting a deer. A total falsehood and you’d have to be a moron to do it since he was airing the episode on TV. They stormed three of his friends’ homes and then searched a room not covered by the search warrant. They found a set of brass knuckles and told Nugent’s friend they would drop the felony charge if he would help them ‘get’ Nugent. Fortunately Ted has very good friends. But they took all kinds of stuff from their homes.
Now, they have made Nugent slaughter his pigs in Michigan – labeling them as feral. Since when is livestock you keep in a pen ‘feral?’ Obviously they either don’t know or more likely, don’t care what the definition is. They were the wrong color and thus deemed ‘feral’ and Nugent was forced to slaughter them. It’s tempting to draw conclusions about motives related to winning points with the Dearbornistan locals, given that the “reason” for slaughtering the pigs is clearly a pretext; one wonders to oneself, could squeezing pig farmers be calibrated to curry favor with a Muslim community?
He’s also been persecuted for his Oryx in Texas as well. They are harassing him about raising these animals when he brought them back from the brink of extinction. A three legged little one was born and he is not being allowed to put it out of its misery. It will die a slow and painful death. How is that compassion? If he puts it down, it’s a felony.
Someone high up would not allow Nugent to attend a SEAL’s funeral when it was the hero’s final wish. His concerts have been cancelled in several cases as well. The Feds interviewed him over comments he made at an NRA conference recently. He was cleared, but I guess free speech is no longer very ‘free’ in this country. Nugent is a good man – a patriotic man. That’s a lot more than you can say about Obama and his thugs.


This isn’t just about Ted Nugent folks – it’s about each and every one of us. They are coming after the bloggers, the patriots, small businesses, you name it. There is no way we can avoid violating one of these bogus laws. It’s only a matter of time. Obama doesn’t care about the Constitution – it means nothing to him. They are coming and we had better stand together, or we will all hang separately as patriots. The way Nugent is being treated is absolutely disgraceful.
From Kim Strassel at the Wall Street Journal:
He’s targeted insurers, oil firms and Wall Street—letting it be known that those who oppose his policies might face political or legislative retribution. He lectured the Supreme Court for giving companies more free speech and (falsely) accused the Chamber of Commerce of using foreign money to bankroll U.S. elections. The White House even ginned up an executive order (yet to be released) to require companies to list political donations as a condition of bidding for government contracts. Companies could bid but lose out for donating to Republicans. Or they could quit donating to the GOP—Mr. Obama’s real aim.
We all know of Obama’s Enemies List, but do you know who his predatory partners are? Along with Communists and radicals, he has a special fondness for the Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, he has opened the front door of the White House and has told them to make themselves at home. These are the evil asshats who support and fund Hamas. These are Islamic terrorists of the ilk that carried out 9-11 and Obama embraces them while persecuting American patriots.


Obama is not even subtle about it. They have removed all references to radical Islam in federal publications. They allow Shariah Law to be carried out on American soil. Obama’s best friend is the Prime Minister of Turkey who gives him advice on his daughters. You see, it doesn’t matter whether Obama is a Muslim or not, his father was. Obama has Islamic street cred. It even gives him a basis for using Taqiyya against Americans. Obama is actively and aggressively promoting Islam around the planet and especially here at home. The only thing that matches his love of Islam, is his hatred of Israel.
If one is known by who his friends and enemies are, then Obama’s predatory partners and the patriots he persecutes are screaming volumes at us. It’s clear that his campaign of pathological politics and communism is on a set of tracks that leads somewhere we dare not go.
Order Trevor Loudon's new book: 'Barack Obama and the Enemies Within'
  

Ingrid Mattson, another radical Muslim friend of Barack Hussein Obama.

The following comes from Bare Naked Islam. Reposted with permission. Two rules of thumb that work in politics as well as everywhere else. "Birds of a feather flock together." And, "You can tell about people by the friends they keep."

Ingrid Mattson, ‘taqiyya’ queen and Barack Obama’s favorite radical Muslim woman, gets her ass whooped by a friend of mine

by barenakedislam

Barack Hussein Obama chose Ingrid Mattson to offer a prayer at his inauguration

Ingrid Mattson, a Catholic who was raised in Ontario, CA, converted to Islam, and went on to become a major figure in the North American Islamic establishment. Until 2010, she served as president of the Muslim Brotherhood front group, ISNA.

FrontPage  Until 2010, Mattson she was head of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a leading national organization which, at the 2007 trial in Dallas of a now-defunct Islamic charity, the Holy Land Foundation, was named an unindicted co-conspirator on charges of aiding Hamas. The trial proved to be an explosive event, uncovering a great deal of vital information about the unsavory connections of supposedly innocuous Muslim organizations in the United States.
  Yet it was almost entirely ignored – and, when not ignored, whitewashed – by the mainstream American media. Mattson “has been disturbingly equivocal about Wahhabism, the repressive and backward strain of Sunni Islam that is the state creed in Saudi Arabia,” describing it as “a reform movement” and comparing it – incredibly – to “the European protestant reformation.”  (Read more of her quotes below the video)

In the video below, Mattson is caught off guard, when Liz Trent starts asking her questions about abrogation* and sharia, to which Mattson tries to tap dance around the truth.

*ABROGATION : This is a key term in studying the Quran. There are some peaceful, tolerant verses in the Quran. But the violent, intolerant ones have abrogated (abolished, done away with) them. The Quran itself explains what to do with conflicting verses. If two passages conflict, it says, the one written later is better than the one written earlier. The earlier passage has been abrogated by the later one. The bad news for non-Muslims is that almost all the peaceful passages were written earlier, and the intolerant, hateful, and violent ones were written later (read more about this).
Because the audio is hard to hear in parts, Liz has provided text describing what is going on. At the end, Liz mentions she has read 'Reliance of the Traveler,' A Classic Manual of Sharia Law, endorsed by most Islamic authorities, that describes in detail how the purpose of jihad is to go to war to force Islam on all unbelievers. With a look that could kill on the face of Mattson, Liz wisely ends the discussion there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ47EVaaRrE

 Most of the following links have been scrubbed from the internet, but fortunately, CAMPUS WATCH has saved them.

1) Mattson places loyalty to Islam before loyalty to the United States of America:

If Muslim Americans are to participate in such a critique of American policy, however, they will only be effective if they do it, according to the Prophet's words, in a "brotherly" fashion. This implies a high degree of loyalty and affection. This does not mean, however, that citizenship and religious community are identical commitments, nor that they demand the same kind of loyalty. People of faith have a certain kind of solidarity with others of their faith community that transcends the basic rights and duties of citizenship.

2) Mattson on the possibility that Americans may "rise to the challenge of defining themselves as an ethical nation":

The first duty of Muslims in America, therefore, is to help shape American policies so they are in harmony with the essential values of this country. In the realm of foreign policy, this "idealistic" view has been out of fashion for some time. Indeed, the American Constitution, like foundational religious texts, can be read in many different ways. The true values of America are those which we decide to embrace as our own. There is no guarantee, therefore, that Americans will rise to the challenge of defining themselves as an ethical nation; nevertheless, given the success of domestic struggles for human dignity and rights in the twentieth century, we can be hopeful.

3) Mattson denies the existence of terrorist cells in the United States:

There's a prejudgment, a collective judgment of Muslims, and a suspicion that well "you may appear nice, but we know there are sleeper cells of Americans," which of course is not true. There aren't any sleeper cells.

4) Mattson defends Wahhabism:

CHAT PARTICIPANT: What can you tell us about the Wahhabi sect of Islam? Is it true that this is an extremely right wing sect founded and funded by the Saudi royal family, and led by Osama bin Ladin? What is the purpose of the Wahhabi?MATTSON: No it's not true to characterize 'Wahhabism' that way. This is not a sect. It is the name of a reform movement that began 200 years ago to rid Islamic societies of cultural practices and rigid interpretation that had acquired over the centuries. It really was analogous to the European protestant reformation. Because the Wahhabi scholars became integrated into the Saudi state, there has been some difficulty keeping that particular interpretation of religion from being enforced too broadly on the population as a whole. However, the Saudi scholars who are Wahhabi have denounced terrorism and denounced in particular the acts of September 11.

5) Mattson on the negative effects of the end of the Islamic Caliphate:

CHAT PARTICIPANT: Osama bin Laden made a reference that Muslims have been living in humiliation for 80 years. Did he refer to the Treaty of Sevres in 1920 that dismantled caliphates and sultanates?MATTSON: Yes, he is referring to that, to the overthrowing of the caliphate, which was a plan of European powers for many years. This deprived the Muslim world of a stable and centralized authority, and much of the chaos that we're living in today is the result of that.

6) Mattson teaches the jihadists Sayyid Qutb and Syed Abu'l-`Ala Mawdudi in her course at Hartford Seminary – see the syllabus here.

7) Mattson praises the jihadist Mawdudi (aka Maududi):

Maududi on jihad (Jihad in Islam, page 9): "Islam wishes to destroy all States and Governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and programme, regardless of which Nation assumes the role of the standard bearer of Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the establishment of an ideological Islamic State. It must be evident to you from this discussion that the objective of Islamic 'Jihad' is to eliminate the rule of an un-Islamic system and establish in its stead an Islamic system of State rule. Islam does not intend to confine this revolution to a single State or a few countries; the aim of Islam is to bring about a universal revolution." "Islamic 'Jihad' does not recognize their right to administer State affairs according to a system which, in the view of Islam, is evil.

8 Although she recommends and teaches Abdul ala Maududi, who advocates violent jihad against non-Muslims (see above), Mattson is highly critical of Christians who make the factual statement that texts by Muslims support violent jihad against non-Muslims -- and she equates Christian critics of violent jihad with Osama bin Laden, who wages violent jihad.

Mattson on critical statements by Christians about Muslims:
"I don't see any difference between that and al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden [using] Islamic theology to justify violence against Americans. What's interesting is if you compare [their] statements about what Islam is and what Muslims believe, you'll find they are almost identical, and I reject both interpretations -- both the non-Muslims who are saying that Islam justifies violence against Christians and Jews, and the Muslims who are saying it. "

9) Mattson is a traditionalist on Shariah law and the legitimacy of Shariah authorities:

"As a practicing Muslim, I believe that there is a core of fundamental beliefs and practices that distinguish authentic Islam from deviations. I also believe that apart from this essential core, the task of interpreting the application of Islamic norms to human society is an enormously complicated task, which inevitably leads to a broad range of opinion and practice. I agree with " Sunni" Muslims, the majority of the Muslim community worldwide, that after the death of the Prophet Muhammad, no one has the right to claim infallibility in the interpretation of sacred law."

10) Mattson is a leader in Muslim efforts to censor the right to free speech in America and especially in the United States government:

Ingrid Mattson, the first woman president of the Islamic Society of North America, said Friday at the opening of the group's 43rd annual convention that labeling terrorism as "Islamic" was not helpful to people of her faith." If our major concern is security, security of this country, this is a term that has very bad resonance in the Muslim majority world and makes us feel uncomfortable here," Mattson said. Mattson said her group would argue for a change in rhetoric away from "Islamic fascism."
.....As an alternative to "Islamic fascism," Mattson suggested the words "terrorism, crime, violence," adding that she and other Muslims don't understand why the label "Islamic" is included when Bush and other leaders talk about terrorism.

11) Mattson denies the actual state of women's rights under Shariah law:

"One of the popular misconceptions about Islam is that women are seen as lesser figures, that they don't have rights.http://archives.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/10/18/mattson.cnna/
"MATTSON: Muslim women have the same legal rights as Muslim men. The Prophet Mohammed's wife was a businesswoman.  The legal rights of women were enshrined in Islamic law. However, cultural practices in many societies have prevented those rights from being enforced."

12) Mattson rationalizes the actions of the Taliban against women:

CHAT PARTICIPANT: Does the Taliban place blame upon women for the weakness of men in their society? Is that why they place such restriction upon them?MATTSON: The Taliban place restrictions on everyone in their society, men and women. In their minds, they are protecting women from other men by placing these restrictions on them.

13) Like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Mattson condemns terrorism in general but avoids criticizing Hamas or Hizballah:

"That can be frustrating. I want to also make sure people understand that although American Muslims do have a responsibility to clarify their views on terrorism and violence done in the name of Islam, we don't have control over these situations. We don't have some sort of magic power over all Muslims in the world."

14) Mattson apparently thinks that Evangelical Christians are more of a threat to Jews than Islamic jihadists:

"‘Right-wing Christians are very risky allies for American Jews,' Mattson said, ‘because they [the Christians] are really anti-Semitic. They do not like Jews' and enter into the alliance on the basis of fundamentalist beliefs that it would be desirable for all Jews to return to Israel. She suggested that fundamentalist Christians might turn against Jews or that there could be backlash from ordinary Americans against Jewish and fundamentalist Christian supporters of Israel."

15) Mattson is highly critical of Israel:

"The American government has not criticized sufficiently the brutality of the Israeli government, believing that it needs to be "supportive" of the Jewish state. The result is that oppression, left unchecked, can increase to immense proportions, until the oppressed are smothered with hopelessness and rage."

16) Mattson limits dialogue:

"Thus, it is not permitted for a Muslim to maintain a close friendship with a highly intelligent person who engages him or her in stimulating conversation, if that person continuously derides the sacred (Qur'an 5:57-58). Indeed, since preserving faith is the highest priority, it is important that Muslims avoid demoralizing dependence on other faith communities for their protection and material needs....Clearly there are groups among American Christians and Jews who are so hostile to Muslims that we should not join with them even in shared concerns, lest we lend any credibility to their organizations.

17) Mattson and ISNA have been criticized by those who identify themselves as American Muslim reformers and moderates:

ISNA, which URJ has accepted, apparently uncritically, as a "partner," has a long history of association with extremist trends in Islam. ISNA has served as a front group for Wahhabism, the official sect in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia; the jihadist ideologies originating in Pakistan with the writings of a certain Mawdudi and the Deoband schools in that country — the latter of which produced the Afghan Taliban, and the Ikhwan al-Muslimun, or Muslim Brotherhood.

 

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Obama's Chicago-style politics: how the most undesirable man in politics hopes to get reelected.

We have all heard the story about how Barack Hussein Obama got elected to his first government position in Illinois. He was running in a primary against five other Democrats in Chicago and he used a bunch of lawyers to challenge the nominating petitions of his opponents and had them all disqualified. Being the only remaining Democrat on the ballot he got the job. Then after a brief lackluster career in the Illinois legislature in which he recorded a string of "present" votes on legislation, Obama decided (or his handlers decided for him) to run him for the U.S. Senate. During the election campaign against the popular Illinois Republican Jack Ryan, Obama's advisor David Axelrod surreptitiously managed to get Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert Schnider to unseal some messy divorce papers. Jack Ryan had been married to Hollywood actress Jeri Ryan and they were divorced in 1999. The revelation of those court-sealed documents impacted Ryan's campaign and forced him to withdraw only a few months before the election. The Illinois Republican Party replaced him with Alan Keyes who went on to defeat, thus catapulting Obama into the U.S. Senate in 2004. Wikipedia describes the events this way without revealing the details:
"On March 29, 2004, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert Schnider ruled that several of the Ryans' divorce records should be opened to the public, and ruled that a court-appointed referee would later decide which custody files should remain sealed to protect the interests of Ryan's young child.The following week, on April 2, 2004, Barack Obama formally established his position about the Ryans' soon-to-be-released divorce records, and called on Democrats not to inject them into the campaign. The Ryan campaign characterized Obama's stance as hypocritical, because Obama's alleged backers had been emailing reports about the divorce records prior to Judge Schnider's decision."
On July 27, 2004 the relatively unknown Illinois State Senator Barack Hussein Obama gave the keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention. Although he had already publicly announced his withdrawal from the race, on July 29, 2004 Jack Ryan officially filed his resignation papers to be removed from the Senatorial campaign. Almost immediately after being sworn in to the U.S. Senate, Barack Hussein Obama began his presidential campaign.
Now we see in today's news that the ugly head of Chicago-style machine politics has stepped out again into the light of day. Barack Hussein Obama has singled out the names of eight private citizens who have given campaign donations to Republican Mitt Romney and accused them of "Betting against America". In a story in the Wall Street Journal on April 26, 2012,
Strassel: The President Has a List

Barack Obama attempts to intimidate contributors to Mitt Romney's campaign. 

Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.

Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for "betting against America," and accuses you of having a "less-than-reputable" record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake donating that money.

Are you worried?

Richard Nixon's "enemies list" appalled the country for the simple reason that presidents hold a unique trust. Unlike senators or congressmen, presidents alone represent all Americans. Their powers—to jail, to fine, to bankrupt—are also so vast as to require restraint. Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the practice.

Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules. This past week, one of his campaign websites posted an item entitled "Behind the curtain: A brief history of Romney's donors." In the post, the Obama campaign named and shamed eight private citizens who had donated to his opponent. Describing the givers as all having "less-than-reputable records," the post went on to make the extraordinary accusations that "quite a few" have also been "on the wrong side of the law" and profiting at "the expense of so many Americans."

Read the rest here: http://online.wsj.com/articl/SB10001424052702304723304577368280604524916.html?fb_ref=wsj_share_FB&fb_source=home_multiline
Keep in mind that Barack Hussein Obama has acquired many new powers since he took possession of the White House and among them is the infamous detention of any American citizen who he proclaims to be an enemy of the state. Obama's Homeland Security has labeled many conservative Americans who support Pro-Life and 2nd Amendment issues as being potential terrorists while at the same time Obama was appointing radical communists and Muslims to high posts in the government. Obama's Justice Dept. has protected the violent New Black Panthers. Obama's ability to terrify and intimidate is quite substantial and real and gives all Americans even more reason to throw him out of office in November. Our Founding Fathers decided not to be ruled by a king and chose a Republic, instead, but Obama has been acting like he was some kind of royalty since being sworn in. Our Founding Fathers also had unkind words for dictators, too.
I cannot imagine anyone who calls them self an American voting for any Democrat who, in turn, pledges allegiance to Barack Hussein Obama. 
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Old Ironsides.

 

Friday, April 27, 2012

This is Islamic Sharia Law in action. 16-year old girl forced to marry man who raped her. FOX News omits critical details about Islam.

FOX News reported this story a month ago on their web site but they left out a few important facts. I have read so many stories like this that it just seems redundant to keep repeating them but this story had one additional point that got me fuming. In every Muslim country around the world the only laws practiced are Islamic Sharia law and besides their 7th Century barbaric cruelty, these laws are all written to deny women any protection. That is because these Sharia laws originate from the teachings of the Islamic religion. Under Sharia Law, to prove a rape a woman must have four male witnesses to testify against the rapist. Often, a rape victim is prosecuted as an adulteress and can sometimes be stoned to death. Also under Sharia Law, the rapist can avoid prosecution and the female victim can save her family's honor if she marries her rapist. Many times the female victim of a rape is murdered by her family in an Honor Killing to preserve the family honor, but in this case, the victim committed suicide. FOX News, like all of the other news media is aware of this but News Corp., the parent company of FOX News, recently sold a large chunk of their stock to a Saudi Arabian prince, and now seems obliged to downplay the aspects of Islamic influence on any stories like this. So FOX News never mentioned anything about the law in Morocco being Islamic Sharia Law although they stated that,
"Article 475 of the Moroccan penal code allows for the "kidnapper" of a minor to marry his victim to escape prosecution, and it has been used to justify a traditional practice of making a rapist marry his victim to preserve the honor of the woman's family."
But the point they made that got me fumed was when they injected a comment about the Christian Holy Bible when they said,
"In many parts of the Middle East, there is a tradition whereby a rapist can escape prosecution if he marries his victim, thereby restoring her honor. There is a similar injunction in the Old Testament's Book of Deuteronomy." 
FOX News can compare this vile custom to Christians but they cannot mention anything about Islam or Sharia Law. The Muslim culture has a name for people like this. They call them Dhimmies, and Wikipedia has the origin and definition of the word.
Dhimmitude is a neologism first found in French denoting an attitude of concession, surrender and appeasement towards Islamic demands. It is derived by adding the productive suffix -tude to the Arabic language dhimmi, which literally means protected and refers to a non-Muslim subject of a sharia law state.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Old Ironsides.



    

John Wayne narrates the story: AMERICA, WHY I LOVE HER


AMERICA, WHY I LOVE HER
Narrated by John Wayne

Click this link to hear John Wayne explain the reasons why:

This is all about the beauty and majesty of our great land.
What was not mentioned was our love of freedom and liberty and justice. 
The little things that make the entire world envy us.

My photo of the traveling version of the Vietnam Memorial.

What else that wasn't mentioned were the great sacrifices we have paid to save those freedoms for others in spite of their ingratitude.

GOD BLESS AMERICA

 

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Is the leftist news media trying to set up a trap? What's the hidden agenda behind their glowing praise for Republican Sen. Marco Rubio?

There is no doubt that Republican Senator Marco Rubio is a genuine conservative. We know this because the mainstream liberal news media has been constantly writing about how attractive he is to the conservative wing of the Republican Party.  Every story has been brimming with glowing praise for this conservative Senator from Florida and they all seem to be suggesting that Marco Rubio is going to be picked as Mitt Romney's vice-presidential running mate. The media publicity could well be a suggestive plot to start convincing Republicans that Marco Rubio is the best choice. That was the same treatment that RINO Republican John McCain received in 2008. The pro-Obama pro-Democrat MSM resurrected McCain's failing campaign and helped him win the Republican nomination because he was the weakest candidate. Then they tore him apart after he was nominated.
But there is a sinister undercurrent to these stories today about Marco Rubio that none of the news media, not even the conservative media, has mentioned. Only WorldNet Daily News has brought out the fact that Marco Rubio is constitutional unqualified to be vice-president because he is not a Natural Born Citizen and therefore is not eligible to take the office of president if anything happened to Mitt Romney, if he were elected. This is because both of Marco Rubio's parents were born in Cuba and the definition of a Natural Born Citizen means a person who has both parents born in the United States. This same argument is being made in courts across the land today about Barack Hussein Obama also not being eligible to be president because his father was a British subject who was born in Kenya and had never even applied for U.S. citizenship.
The reason why the news media is pushing Marco Rubio is to create an issue that would cause a large number of Republicans to stay home on Election Day. If Rubio were to get on the ticket then the fact that he was not a Natural Born Citizen would be the #1 news story broadcast and publicized across America in every pro-Democrat newspaper and television station every day until November. In plain language it's called a setup.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Old Ironsides.

  

Sunday, April 22, 2012

UPDATE on that Islamic Eid al-Adha holiday that electronics retailer Best Buy honored.

The British newspaper, Daily Mail, has reported how a gang of Muslim men celebrated the Islamic holiday Eid al-Adha over in England. Wonder if those pro-Islamic dhimmies at Best Buy worry about this sort of news happening here in America when they honored Muslims by wishing them a "Happy Eid al-Adha" holiday in there newspaper advertisements. Maybe, just maybe, if Best Buy had stuck to honoring their Christian shoppers and wished them a "Merry Christmas" instead of dumping them in favor of Muslims they wouldn't be closing 50 stores now to stave off going bankrupt.
Muslim gang jailed for kidnapping and raping two girls as part of their Eid celebrations
  • Victims were lured miles from home to dingy hostel
  • They were subjected to a weekend-long ordeal
By Katherine Faulkner
|
A group of Muslim men who abducted and raped two teenage girls as part of their Eid celebrations laughed in court yesterday as they were jailed for a total of 38 years. The girls, aged 15 and 16, were lured miles from their home to a dingy hostel.
In a horrifying weekend-long ordeal, they were plied with alcohol and repeatedly raped by two men, Shamrez Rashid and Amar Hussain, before being offered to a number of others who also ‘used them for sex’.
The 16-year old was forced to have sex six times with four different men.
The younger victim was raped by one man and then sexually assaulted by another.
One defendant, Rashid, 20, was said to have claimed the girls had enjoyed the sex, which he said had taken place as they celebrated the Muslim festival of Eid.
‘It was Eid,’ he said. ‘We treated them as our guests. OK, so they gave us [sex] but we were buying them food and drink.
‘They could have anything they wanted. They enjoyed it.’
His accomplice Amar Hussain, 22, claimed the girls were ‘slags’.
But Judge Melbourne Inman QC said the girls had still been children at the time of the offences.
He said it was quite obvious they had been frightened of the men, but this had had ‘no effect at all’ on their attackers’ behaviour.
‘They were still children and still living with their families,’ Judge Inman said. ‘In a civilised society, such people should be helped. You all abused them.
‘They were extremely vulnerable and you took advantage of that.’
The five defendants laughed and smirked as the horrifying details of their offences were described in court yesterday.
Rashid – who had already been found guilty of two rapes, an attempted rape, child abduction and an attempted sexual assault – grinned, laughed and made gun gestures in the dock.
His supporters in the public gallery hurled abuse at the judge as he passed sentence later....
And, as Jihad Watch reminds us, "Enjoying the sex slaves allowed by the Qur'an (men may enjoy "what your right hands own," 4:3) and Islamic law. "Muslim gang jailed for kidnapping and raping two girls as part of their Eid celebrations," by Katherine Faulkner in the Daily Mail, April 20". What this all proves is that the followers of Islam do not acknowledge or respect the laws or constitutions of man-made governments.  And those Muslims who tell you that they do respect our laws are following the Islamic principle of Taqiyya that commands them to lie to non-Muslims whenever it benefits Islam.
 
 

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Best Buy tilts full left by becoming a Platinum Sponsor of Islamic terrorist-funding group.


Islamist Watch Blog
Action Alert – Best Buy: TV's, Computers and Hamas
by Marc J. Fink  •  Apr 17, 2012 at 3:39 pm

Letter from a 95-year old Navy Veteran puts Barack Hussein Obama in his place.

This is the actual text of a letter written in 2009 by a retired Navy Veteran named Harold Estes who lives in a retirement home in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The letter was confirmed by Honolulu, Hawaii television station KITV as noted in the Snopes reference.

This venerable and much honored WW II vet is well known in Hawaii for his seventy-plus years of service to patriotic organizations and causes all over the country. A humble man without a political bone in his body, he has never spoken out before about a government official, until now. He dictated this letter to a friend, signed it and mailed it to the president.

Dear President Obama,

My name is Harold Estes, approaching 95 on December 13 of this year. People meeting me for the first time don't believe my age because I remain wrinkle free and pretty much mentally alert. 

I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1934 and served proudly before, during and after WW II retiring as a Master Chief Bos'n Mate. Now I live in a "rest home" located on the western end of Pearl Harbor , allowing me to keep alive the memories of 23 years of service to my country. 

One of the benefits of my age, perhaps the only one, is to speak my mind, blunt and direct even to the head man. 

So here goes. 

I am amazed, angry and determined not to see my country die before I do, but you seem hell bent not to grant me that wish. 

I can't figure out what country you are the president of. You fly around the world telling our friends and enemies despicable lies like: "We're no longer a Christian nation" "America is arrogant" - (Your wife even announced to the world, "America is mean-spirited." Please tell her to try preaching that nonsense to 23 generations of our war dead buried all over the globe who died for no other reason than to free a whole lot of strangers from tyranny and hopelessness.) 
I'd say shame on the both of you, but I don't think you like America, nor do I see an ounce of gratefulness in anything you do, for the obvious gifts this country has given you. To be without shame or gratefulness is a dangerous thing for a man sitting in the White House.

After 9/11 you said," America hasn't lived up to her ideals."

1. Which ones did you mean? Was it the notion of personal liberty that 11,000 farmers and shopkeepers died for to win independence from the British?
2. Or maybe the ideal that no man should be a slave to another man, that 500,000 men died for in the Civil War?
3. I hope you didn't mean the ideal 470,000 fathers, brothers, husbands, and a lot of fellas I knew personally died for in WWII, because we felt real strongly about not letting any nation push us around, because we stand for freedom.

4. I don't think you mean the ideal that says equality is better than discrimination. You know the one that a whole lot of white people understood when they helped to get you elected.

Take a little advice from a very old geezer, young man. Shape up and start acting like an American. If you don't, I'll do what I can to see you get shipped out of that fancy rental on Pennsylvania Avenue . You were elected to lead not to bow, apologize and kiss the hands of murderers and corrupt leaders who still treat their people like slaves.

And just who do you think you are telling the American people not to jump to conclusions and condemn that Muslim major who killed 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded dozens more. You mean you don't want us to do what you did when that white cop used force to subdue that black college professor in Massachusetts , who was putting up a fight? You don't mind offending the police calling them stupid but you don't want us to offend Muslim fanatics by calling them what they are, terrorists.

One more thing. I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you're the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job. When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him. But if you're not in this fight to win, then get out. The life of one American soldier is not worth the best political strategy you're thinking of.

You could be our greatest president because you face the greatest challenge ever presented to any president. 
 
You're not going to restore American greatness by bringing back our bloated economy. That's not our greatest threat. Losing the heart and soul of who we are as Americans is our big fight now. 

And I sure as hell don't want to think my president is the enemy in this final battle...

Sincerely,
Harold B. Estes 
 
When a 95 year old hero of the "the Greatest Generation" stands up and speaks out like this, I think we owe it to him to send his words to as many Americans as we can.