Radical Muslim terrorists training on American soil.

It has been know by our government for some time now that militant Islamic radicals have established training camps in America. I posted some of this information last year. See my post  Wednesday, December 23, 2009, Muslim terrorist training camp in New York is quiet. Where did all the terrorists go

Now, a web site called Shock Military.com has posted a segment from FOX News with Sean Hannity interviewing Martin Mawyer from Christian Action.org showing a video made by the terrorists themselves in these training camps.

Please note the answer to the question about how can our government allow these terrorists training camps to exist on our soil. Because they have a right under the Constitution!!! Does this make you wonder who the real target of The Patriot Act really is? Department of Homeland Security publishes a list defining conservative groups as being domestic terrorists but does nothing about the actual Muslim terrorists training with military tactics in America.

What is wrong with the Patriot Act.  Who or what you call a terrorist is not the same as   what the Dept. of Homeland Security calls a terrorist. When you think  of a  terrorist you probably have in mind the radical Muslims who  attacked America  on Sept. 11, 2001. These people are whom the original  Patriot Act was designed  to go after. But the Patriot Act is simply a tool that provides law enforcement extra special powers, it is up to  the government to define who those powers will be used against. It is like a powerful weapon that a good person carries but then it falls  into the hands of someone who is not a good person. 

You have probably heard about the Department of  Homeland Security’s controversial document that was published last year (U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current  Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment. It is available here: http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf  Two weeks before this was published, Dept. of Homeland  Security  published a document called (U//FOUO)  Domestic Extremism  Lexicon, available here: http://www.tdbimg.com/files/2009/04/30/-hsra-domestic-extremism-lexicon_165213935473.pdf

The DHS document also includes  precursors to the ill-fated "Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate  Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" report, which prompted outrage from legislators and a campaign calling for the resignation of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. For example, the lexicon contains virtually the same  broad-stroke language the right-wing extremism report used. And all right-wing extremists are considered domestic terrorists "Right-wing extremism," the lexicon defines as those "who can be broadly divided into those who are primarily hate-oriented, and those who are mainly anti-government and reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority. This term also may refer to right-wing extremist movements that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

The left-wing Democrats in Washington want to tie all their plans into a neat bundle. Make no mistake, Disarming Americans is an important part of that plan. Taking into consideration that DHS has virtually declared that you and I are both “Right Wing Extremists” now consider that Attorney General Eric Holder has proposed legislation to prohibit any person considered a domestic terrorist or right-wing extremist from owning a firearm. My guess is that thanks to the Political Correctness in Washington, Eric Holder's plan doesn't prohibit Islamic terrorists from owning guns because they are not mentioned in the DHS lexicon.