From the time the Pilgrims arrived on American soil, faith in God played an important part in shaping our nation. Images of Moses adorn the Supreme Court in recognition of the Judeo-Christian origin of our laws. But it was Taxes, loss of Liberty and oppression from a mad king that led our Founding Fathers to write The Declaration of Independence and start The American Revolution. Today, those who stand for these ideals no longer call themselves The Silent Majority because we are silent no more.
Fighting Back Against the Assault on Free Speech by Radical Islamic Groups
Our nation's security and its cherished value of free speech has been
endangered by the bullying campaigns of radical Islamic groups,
masquerading as "civil rights" organizations, to remove any reference to
the Islamist motivation behind Islamic terrorist attacks. These groups
have pressured or otherwise colluded with Hollywood, the news media,
museums, book publishers, law enforcement and the Obama Administration
in censoring the words "Islamist", "Islamic terrorism", "radical Islam"
and "jihad" in discussing or referencing the threat and danger of
Islamic terrorism.
It is undeniable that those behind the 9-11 attacks and other Islamic
terrorism were motivated by radical Islamic ideology. To deny the truth
behind the religious motivation of Islamic terrorists is an insult to
the memory of the 9-11 victims and all other victims of Islamic
terrorism. Islamist terrorists were behind the bombing of Madrid's
commuter train system in 2004; they attacked London's subways in 2005;
they opened fire on innocents in a Kenyan shopping mall in 2013. U.K.
jihadists hacked a British soldier to death that same year. Just weeks
ago, Nigerian Islamists kidnapped hundreds of schoolgirls and forced
them to convert to Islam.
Radical Islamist ideology clearly motivated all of the attacks – the perpetrators said so unambiguously.
Yet, those who dare to talk about jihad as holy war, or invoke the
term "Islamic terrorists", or discuss the religious motivation behind
Islamist group, are slandered as "Islamophobes" or bigots. The
courageous Muslim voices who dare criticize radical Islam find
themselves scurrilously attacked and slandered by national Islamist
groups as turncoats – "Uncle Toms"—when these moderates should be lauded
as heroes.
This is the new form of the jihadist threat we face. It's an attack
on one of our most sacred freedoms—free speech—and it endangers our very
national security.
How can we win the war against radical Islam if we can't even name the enemy?
Here are the main radical Islamic groups that have led the campaign
of censorship: The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the
Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), the Muslim American Society (MAS),
Muslim Advocates, and the Muslim Students Association (MSA). (You can
read about their true backgrounds by clicking here).
In addition to embracing censorship campaign of the above-listed
American Islamist groups, the Obama Administration, astonishingly,
legitimizes the groups themselves. The groups are routinely invited to
events at the White House and other Administration meetings.
The chill on free speech takes an even more dangerous turn when
prosecutors charged with keeping us safe are prohibited from
investigating the religious justifications for terrorist attacks.
Scandalously, the FBI has succumbed to pressure from these Islamist
groups in purging and destroying thousands of books, pamphlets, papers
and PowerPoint presentations that were deemed to be "offensive to
Islam."
American Islamist groups are continuing to succeed in curbing free speech. New examples seem to pop up each week.
Brandeis University capitulated to an organized campaign to rescind
plans to give Ayaan Hirsi Ali – a tireless campaigner against abuses of
women in Muslim cultures – an honorary degree. ABC Family Channel killed
a pilot TV series, called "Alice in Arabia," about an American teenage
girl forced to live against her will in Saudi Arabia. Universities have
canceled screenings of a documentary called "Honor Diaries."
In deceptive public statements, Islamist groups claim they are
against "terrorism." But when asked if they specifically condemn
"Islamic terrorist groups", they refuse to acknowledge the Islamist
motivation, a motivation the Islamic terrorists openly admit themselves.
Islamist groups do backflips to avoid discussing the role their shared
radical ideology plays in terrorist attacks.
It is time to fight back and not allow these radical Islamic groups
to continue to undermine our fundamental value of free speech and
endanger our national security.
I drop a comment whenever I especially enjoy a post on a blog or if I have something to valuable to contribute to the conversation. Usually it's triggered by the sincerness displayed in the article I looked at. And on this post "The Investigative Project On Terrorism: Call to Action by the American People". I was moved enough to post a commenta response ;) I actually do have 2 questions for you if you usually do not mind. Could it be just me or do a few of these comments appear like they are coming from brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are writing at additional social sites, I would like to keep up with anything new you have to post. Would you make a list every one of your community sites like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?
This blog site uses cookies from Google and from Stat Counter to analyze visitor traffic. The only information captured by these stat counters are your IP address along with your city, state and country. The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requires this notice. If you don't want this information recorded you should leave now and don't come back.
My name is Nelson Abdullah. I am 77-years old and after 40 years of working for two major airlines, I retired 15 years ago in 2002, a few months after the 9-11 attack on America. My wife and I have been married for more than 56 years. We celebrated our Golden Anniversary in April 2010.
My wife and I are both lifelong Catholics and registered Republicans.
Our country was created as a Constitutional Republic, a nation of laws, held together by the fabric of the Constitution. The Constitution limits the powers of the government while the first ten amendments, called The Bill of Rights, guarantee the rights of We The People. Defending the Republic.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” —The Declaration of Independence—July 4th, 1776.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
I drop a comment whenever I especially enjoy a post on a blog or if I have something to
ReplyDeletevaluable to contribute to the conversation. Usually it's triggered by the sincerness displayed in the article I looked
at. And on this post "The Investigative Project On Terrorism: Call to Action by the American People".
I was moved enough to post a commenta response ;) I actually do have 2
questions for you if you usually do not mind. Could it be just me or
do a few of these comments appear like they are coming from brain dead folks?
:-P And, if you are writing at additional social sites, I would like to keep up with anything new you
have to post. Would you make a list every one of your community sites like your
Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?
my blog weight blast