skip to main |
skip to sidebar
February 3, 2012
Justice Ginsburg Calls U.S. Constitution a Bad Example
www.LC.org
Washington, DC - In a recent interview
with Egyptian television, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
insulted the U.S. Constitution and advised Egypt to look somewhere else
when drafting its own constitution. Justice Ginsburg was asked to give
insight on this crucial topic for the post-Mubarak government but
focused more on liberal human rights, rather than traditional American
freedom.
When describing the nature of a constitution, Justice Ginsburg did
appropriately recognize the importance of a constitution and the duty of
the citizens to defend it. Justice Ginsburg did not, unfortunately,
take her own advice. She undermined insight of its crafters and stated,
“I would not look to the US Constitution if I were drafting a
Constitution in the year 2012.”
Instead, Justice Ginsburg referred to
the constitutions of more supposedly progressive countries, like South
Africa, Canada, and the European Convention on Human Rights. She stated,
“I can't speak about what the Egyptian experience should be, because
I'm operating under a rather old constitution.” This directly refutes
the U.S. Constitution’s relevance today.
For a United States Supreme Court Justice, entrusted with the duty to
interpret the Constitution, this type of statement is unacceptable.
Justice Ginsburg failed to respect the authority of the document that it
is her duty to protect. When given the opportunity to promote American
liberty abroad, Justice Ginsburg did just the opposite and pointed Egypt
in the direction of progressivism and the liberal agenda.
Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel and Dean of
Liberty University School of Law, said, “For a sitting U.S. Supreme
Court Justice to speak derisively about the Constitution she is sworn to
uphold is distressing, to say the least. Justice Ginsburg's comments
about our Constitution undermine the Supreme Court as an institution
dedicated to the rule of law, as well as our founding document.”
As for Mathew Staver's comment, “For a sitting U.S. Supreme
Court Justice to speak derisively about the Constitution she is sworn to
uphold is distressing, to say the least.", THAT is an understatement. Justice Ginsberg should be hauled before Congress and read the riot act. That old expression that says, "America, Love It Or Leave It" applies to everyone, including the Supreme Court.
Good post. With justices like that is it any wonder why we are so screwed up.
ReplyDelete