Thursday, November 7, 2013

From the New Zeal blog: Grand Theft Obama: The Biggest Heist in U.S. History


Posted: 06 Nov 2013 10:45 AM PST
By: James Simpson
Accuracy in Media
grandtheftobama
Our nation is being stolen before our very eyes. The American people are being robbed of their livelihoods, their security and their freedom. President Obama makes grand sweeping gestures and delivers soaring rhetoric about helping the poor and achieving fairness. But he merely draws our attention away from the hand that is reaching deep into our pockets. Such is the nature of his extremist legislative agenda. Call it Grand Theft Obama, but it is no video game; this is for real.
And it is not merely monetary theft, as is apparent from Obamacare. America is being fundamentally transformed, as Obama promised. This is one promise that he clearly intends to keep, no matter how many people lose their health insurance policies, their jobs, or their productive futures.
Even the liberal media have been forced to acknowledge President Obama’s lies regarding the Affordable Care Act, especially the whopper about being able to keep your own health insurance policy.
Consider what we have learned so far as the lies are being exposed:
While some of this is now being discussed and debated, the revelations come three years after the passage of the health care legislation. House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi famously said they would have to pass the legislation to find out what was in it, but the media should not have used that same excuse. They failed in their jobs to uncover the hidden costs and real agenda. They failed, in other words, to do their jobs.
Simply put, they took Obama at his word—that he just wanted to help the poor. His actual agenda was political power.
For the most part, until the Obamacare lies became a national story, Obama was aided and abetted in this process by the institutionally corrupt and ideologically driven mass media. They attack, smear, and assassinate the character of anyone with the gall to speak the truth. Today’s media do not provide information, but misinformation. As Pat Caddell famously said, the mainstream media have literally become the “enemy of the American people.”
For modern-day progressives, lying is not merely something one does to avoid getting caught, lying is tradecraft. Thus our President lies. But these are no ordinary lies; they are grand, sweeping, all-encompassing lies. He says exactly the opposite of truth, consistently, to confuse people, and tops it off by accusing his opponents of doing what he does.
This may sound harsh, but Obamacare provides the proof.
Media Malpractice
During the 2008 election one commenter stated, “It’s like running against God. The media have anointed him.” Clinton campaign manager Terry McAuliffe claimed 90 percent of the media were behind Obama. This was reflected in the unwillingness of the major media, such as The Washington Post, to subject candidate Obama to elementary vetting. Hence, his relationship with Communist Frank Marshall Davis and backing from the Democratic Socialists of America were topics considered off-limits. Even some conservatives in the media thought Obama would turn out to be a centrist.
The important film “Media Malpractice” catalogs the breathtaking conspiracy of media advocacy for Barack Obama during the 2008 election.
This may be changing, judging by media reporting on the Obamacare lies and the belated coverage by the CBS “60 Minutes” program of the official lies about what caused the Benghazi terror attacks.
Shutdown Police State Tactics
To understand how lies drive the administration’s policies and agenda, consider the coverage of the recent government “shutdown.” From what you probably heard in the media, Republicans forced the government shutdown. Actually, Republicans provided funding for most government activities except the problematic Obamacare. Obama orchestrated the shutdown to pin blame on Republicans and improve chances for Democrats to retake the House of Representatives in 2014. With media help, the strategy worked perfectly.
Unlike previous shutdowns, agencies got specific orders to “make life as difficult for people as we can.” In many cases this actually cost the government more than if they left things running. Breitbart compiled a list of 47 outrages the Obama administration committed to pressure Republicans, while Obama consistently refused to negotiate. This list included:
Finally, Obama furloughed intelligence operatives, putting our entire nation at risk, according to his own Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.
When protests over one aspect of the shutdown, the barricades in front of the monuments, became too impossible to ignore, the media smeared the protesters. Leftist “comedian” Bill Maher said, “[WW II veterans are] the greatest generation—nobody said they were the brightest generation.” Radio host Bill Press called veterans of the Million Vets March “Idiots.” Meanwhile Democrats called Republicans everything including jihadists, arsonists, blackmailers, and terrorists running around with bombs strapped to their chest.
As a result, the conventional wisdom is that Republicans have suffered from the shutdown. The “conventional wisdom” is provided by the media, and their often-skewed polls designed to exaggerate that effect.
Debt Limit Brinkmanship
Prior to the latest debt limit agreement, Obama threatened to default on the federal debt—sending jitters through financial markets. It would have been the first default in history. Obama’s Treasury Department also issued a report titled, The Potential Macroeconomic Effect of Debt Ceiling Brinkmanship. But President Obama was the one engaged in “brinkmanship,” even while accusing Republicans of doing so.
To avoid default, the government needs only to pay interest, about $35 billion per month. The Treasury collects about $250 billion per month, more than enough. But Obama claimed he didn’t have the authority.
To call him on it, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 807, the Full Faith and Credit Act, making the authority explicit, but Obama promised to veto it—implicitly admitting he could avoid default if he wanted. But Obama was willing to threaten a major financial collapse to achieve short-term political objectives.
However, all we heard from the media was a non-stop barrage of angry “news” reports accusing Republicans of trying to destroy the economy.
Stimulating his Cronies
Obama’s background as a “community organizer” was well-known when he ran for the presidency. But less well-known was his role as a board member of five non-profits in the 1990s, when he used his position to shower money on friends and political associates. When he later ran for office, they returned the favor. President Obama has applied this corrupt, Chicago machine method on a national level, most spectacularly with his so-called “economic stimulus,” the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).
The secret goal of the stimulus was to execute Obama’s political agenda. The bill was originally crafted by Obama transition staff and congressional Democrats almost as soon as he was elected. It recommended a Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (RATB), to oversee disbursement of stimulus money, and incredibly, gave RATB power to block IG investigations into their activities. Subsequent events demonstrate why the “most transparent administration in history” needed RATB.
In 2004, the Apollo Alliance—a constellation of radical leftist labor, environmental, civil rights, business, and political leaders—was specifically created to direct “green jobs” funding. Its New York branch was led by Jeff Jones, a former Weatherman terrorist and friend of “Bomber Bill” Ayers. He quit when his identity was revealed.
Yet, Apollo’s national steering committee had included Van Jones, the former communist who was Obama’s “Green Jobs Czar” until exposed by Trevor Loudon and Glenn Beck and forced to resign. Jones landed back on his feet, as a “fellow” at the Center for American Progress and later as a co-host on CNN’s new “Crossfire” show.
The fate of Van Jones is instructive. No matter how disgraced they become, Obama’s leftist allies never give up and always maintain their credibility with the media. Likewise, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who left four Americans to die at Benghazi, is running for president in 2016, with media interest and encouragement. Even Republican Senator John McCain (AZ) makes headlines by saying she did a good job, except for Benghazi.
The Green Jobs Scam
Although the Solyndra bankruptcy served as a glimpse into the use of tax dollars for political purposes in order to benefit Obama’s cronies, the story is not over. In total, $150 billion, including $80 billion from the stimulus, is supposed to be spent on “green energy” projects between 2009 and 2014.
So far, 33 companies that were provided $7.4 billion in tax dollars have either gone bankrupt, are declaring bankruptcy or are on the edge. And this is just the beginning. Even The Washington Post agrees that the entire “green energy” program has been “infused with politics,” with Obama supporters invested in green energy companies selected for stimulus funds, and others joining the administration to oversee the program.
But we have to dig deeper, in terms of the effect on the economy. President Obama promised that the “stimulus” would “create or save” 3.5 million jobs by 2011 and that the unemployment rate would never rise above 8.5 percent. His economic advisors predicted that unemployment could rise to 8.8 percent if the stimulus was not enacted.
A 2011 study by the Mercatus Center showed just how wrong they were. Chart 1 compares the President’s forecast unemployment rates assuming the stimulus bill was passed (blue), and the unemployment rates that actually obtained (red).
Chart 1
The President’s advisors further forecast that by 2012, unemployment would be down to 6.0 percent. The official civilian unemployment rate is now 7.3 percent.
By any objective measure, the Obama policies have failed. But were they designed to succeed? Or just benefit Obama and his allies?
The more accurate measure of unemployment includes discouraged workers—those who have given up looking for work. This stands at 13.7 percent, more than six percentage points higher than the official rate. Furthermore, the gap between the official rate and the discouraged worker rate has grown, suggesting that a greater proportion of the working age population is staying out of the labor force. (See Chart 2).
Chart 2
Obamacare Could Cost Over $1 Trillion Per Year
With the media finally paying attention to the lies that gave rise to Obamacare, it is worth taking a detailed look at this program, dubbed Obama’s “signature” legislation.
The number of lies, deceptions and payoffs that went into enacting Obamacare could fill an encyclopedia. People who criticize Senator Ted Cruz for his historic 21 hour Senate speech should recognize that he focused the nation like a laser beam on Obamacare’s many flaws. His stand was vindicated by the seemingly endless series of stories now appearing about not only the Obamacare website malfunctions but the millions of Americans losing the health policies they were promised they could keep.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) initially estimated Obamacare’s 10-year cost at under $1 trillion. They dishonestly counted costs from 2010, though the program wouldn’t officially start until 2014. And with $900 billion in “savings” from increased taxes and Medicare cuts, Obamacare would be free! As humorist P.J. O’Rourke quipped, “If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.”
CBO’s projected cost for 2014 to 2023 is $2.5 trillion. But the CBO ignored additional burdens faced by businesses and individuals that government does not pay. This and other factors could raise the 10-year cost to over $6 trillion.
Even this doesn’t tell the full story. Market distortions and future law changes are sure to add more costs as Obamacare is likely to be transformed into a single-payer system as in Britain, where expenditures have grown 1,000 percent since the program began. Currently they spend $170 billion annually, serving a population of 53 million. Extended to America’s 315 million people, it would cost $1.2 trillion per year.
Whatever the final cost, Obamacare will not save money. According to a Senate Budget Committee report, Obamacare will add $17 trillion to the government’s unfunded mandates over the next 75 years, raising the total to $82 trillion, including Social Security and Medicare.
Obama claimed health insurance premiums would go down by as much as $2,500 per year. In fact, individuals and families will see increased premiums in 45 of the 50 states.
Subsidies will lower costs for about 15 percent of the population, who will defend the program once it becomes entrenched, but quality will decline for everyone. Ultimately it will falter, just as Britain’s system is failing now. More taxpayer dollars and more central government control will be required to prop it up.
Clearly, Obama’s goal was not improved healthcare, but more political power and benefits for his political party and his allies. A good example is Canadian website contractor CGI.
Consider:
Before the Obamacare website rollout, the media mindlessly fawned over it. CNN’s new Crossfire co-host, former “Green Jobs Czar” Van Jones, heralded it “a huge breakthrough” for the uninsured. MSNBC’s Ed Schultz enthused that it was easy to navigate. Bloomberg’s Peter Gosselin equated it to shopping on Amazon. CBS’s Jill Schlesinger thought it was like Travelocity. ABC’s Rebecca Jarvis compared it to mall shopping.
Premeditated, Manufactured Chaos
Considering the debacle it has become, the media should not only expose the glaring problems that continue to unfold, but also examine whether this is the result of incompetence or design.
Following the shutdown/showdown debacle, Obama gratuitously accused Republicans of a “manufactured crisis.” It is interesting that Obama accused Republicans of such a plan, given the title of a viral 2008 article, “Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis.” There is such a strategy; Obama has known about it for decades and is using it now.
It was developed in the 1960s by Columbia University professors Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, who published an article in Nation magazine titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty.” By packing welfare rolls with new beneficiaries, they hoped to bankrupt local governments and foment a blazing revolution when benefits dried up. It came to be known as the “Cloward Piven Strategy,” or simply “Crisis Strategy.”
The strategy helped explode welfare rolls in the 1960s and 1970s, and precipitated New York City’s near bankruptcy in 1975. Speaking of that crisis, New York Mayor Rudolf Giuliani accused the pair of economic sabotage.
Cloward and Piven created the organizations tasked with executing this strategy, most notably ACORN. Subsequently, the strategy was applied to: 1) Housing, where the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and similar groups colluded with the Clinton White House to foment the subprime mortgage crisis that led to the 2008 crash; 2) Voting, through enactment of the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, (aka Motor Voter), again with Clinton complicity; and 3) Illegal immigration.
Cloward and Piven were the authors of Motor Voter, which turns motor vehicle and other state offices into defacto low income voter registration drives. This law allowed the nationwide explosion of voter registration fraud conducted by ACORN, and is largely responsible for today’s 24 million bad registrations nationwide. Motor Voter also made Obamacare’s online voter registration possible.
Obama has connections to Cloward and Piven, ACORN and its voter registration arm, Project Vote, going back to the early 1990s. The Holder Justice Department has been caught colluding with Project Vote in Motor Voter lawsuits. Matthew Vadum, author of the ACORN exposé, Subversion Inc, reports that former ACORN leaders are still working with Obama.
One has to consider the distinct possibility that Obamacare is part of a deliberate strategy to overwhelm the American people with crisis upon crisis until they throw up their arms in despair and give up.
Voter Manipulation
Obama and the Democrats’ latest complaint is that voter ID laws suppress the vote. The Holder Justice Department has turned that accusation into a legal assault against voter ID laws. The charge is absurd on its face. The reason that Democrats don’t want voter ID laws is because they don’t want their various vote fraud schemes exposed. We know they engage in vote fraud.
But even if they had not stolen a single vote, Democrats have been using tax dollars to buy off entire voting blocs of Americans with trillions of dollars in benefits and created thousands of taxpayer-funded non-profits that are actually ground armies for leftist activism.
This has been going on for decades. In 1961, Richard Cloward co-founded a welfare program that became the model for President Johnson’s “War on Poverty,”[1] which birthed the Office of Economic Opportunity. Conservative activist Howard Phillips ran OEO in 1973, and identified Cloward and Piven as OEO’s “ideological architects.” He said OEO financed “10,000 organizations employing several hundred thousand people” to radically transform U.S. policy outside the political process.[2]
Democratic politicians justify the burgeoning welfare state as reflecting compassion for the “poor and oppressed.” Cloward and Piven were much more honest: “If organizers can deliver millions of dollars in cash benefits to the ghetto masses, it seems reasonable to expect that the masses will deliver their loyalties to their benefactors.”
It worked. In 1960, only 58 percent of black voters were Democrats. By 1968, 92 percent were Democrats and only three percent were Republicans.
In 1932, FDR used this same kind of strategy to deliver Democrat majorities in Congress for the next 60 years. Cloward and Piven explained:
Although these [New Deal] measures were a response to the imperative of economic crisis, the types of measures enacted were designed to secure [a] new Democratic coalition.
Today, close to 50 percent of Americans pay no taxes, and lower income groups can obtain government benefits that provide the equivalent of up to $50,000 per year, strongly encouraging welfare dependency.
Democrats don’t care. It was Cloward and Piven’s explicit goal to create misery and strife sufficient to trigger a blazing revolution. As they reported in their “Weight of the Poor” article:
“Moreover, this kind of mass influence is cumulative because benefits are continuous. Once eligibility for basic food and rent grants is established, the drain on local resources persists indefinitely…”
The consequences of welfare state policies are evident everywhere. Consider the following statistics:
Witness the burned out, abandoned buildings staining our cities, especially Detroit. Think of the entrenched crime, drugs, prostitution, and abandoned children that are the face of inner city ghettos, and reflect on Cloward and Piven’s enthusiasm that “the drain on local resources persists indefinitely…” In Detroit, the response of the Obama administration has been to pour more federal money, an estimated $300 million, into the city, in part to demolish public housing originally constructed with federal funds, and then to construct more.
Incredibly, Bill de Blasio, poised to become New York City’s new Democratic mayor on November 5, says, “The federal government must get back in the affordable housing business, and the federal government must get back in the mass transit business and infrastructure business.”
On top of failure after failure, this Obama-backed Democrat wants more of the same. He might as well be a spokesman for the Democratic Party as a whole. Perhaps that will be his role in the years ahead.
Obama and the Democrats are now feverishly working to inflate this roster of the needy by pushing through amnesty for illegal aliens, officially numbering 11 million, but probably more like 30 million people. Congress is currently debating this plan, with some Republicans, such as John McCain, willing to accommodate Obama’s scheme, in the name of “comprehensive immigration reform.”
Spending is THE Problem
The ARRA is the largest single Keynesian stimulus program since the 1930s. And that wasn’t all. There was the $100 billion auto bailout, endless unemployment benefit extensions and the $26 billion teacher bailout. Obama proposed an additional $447 billion “jobs” bill in 2011, which, fortunately, never passed.
As the unemployment analysis showed, these programs do not help; they merely transfer dollars from the private market to government.
Chart 3
Government spending will continue to increase substantially in the coming years. This is a deliberate effort by Obama, who learned from Cloward and Piven how to collapse an economy. The strategy has moved from the local to the national. It will have global repercussions.
This was originally published at Accuracy in Media.
———————————————————-
[1] Matthew Vadum, Subversion Inc.: How Obama’s ACORN Red Shirts are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers, WND Books, (New York, 2011), p. 77.
[2] Ibid, p. 79.
James Simpson is an economist, businessman and investigative journalist. His articles have been published at American Thinker, Accuracy in Media, Breitbart, PJ Media, Washington Times, WorldNetDaily and others. His regular column is DC Independent Examiner. Follow Jim on Twitter & Facebook.

Local Muslims and CAIR laying the groundwork for a lawsuit against DHL for prayer-related termination.


Its going on all across the country. Local business hires Muslims, then Muslims demand changes in workplace rules to accommodate their so-called religious requirements. Last month it happened at a DHL mail sorting facility at CVG airport in Northern Kentucky but the full page story only appeared today in the Kentucky Enquirer. The source of the reporter's background information is unclear and he raised no questions to contest the accuracy of the Muslims complaints. He could well have been writing his story from a handout given to him by the local chapter of CAIR, Council on American-Islamic Relations, who has taken up the case on behalf of the fired workers. The facts in the case are simple. For the last few years a group of 24 Somali Muslims working at DHL were allowed by their supervisor to take a special 5-minute break on their shift to gather and say evening prayers according to their religion. Then a new supervisor came on the shift, which starts at 6 PM and refused the workers saying the earliest break time they could stop work to pray was at 8:00PM. So the entire Muslim group decided to walk off the job at 7:24PM one night to go and pray and the supervisor fired them for insubordination. He did not fire them for praying, he fired them for refusing to go back to work.

The Enquirer story contains some factual errors regarding the prayer time requirements. If DHL doesn't cave in to the ex-workers demands then these facts go to the heart of the pending lawsuit. There is no religious requirement to stop and pray at a specific time. One worker is quoted in the story saying: "We do not have a choice. We must stop what we are doing and pray." Not being a Muslim I went to research the demand over the daily Islamic prayer schedule and found an interesting explanation about Salat (the daily prayers) on Wikipedia.
Salat consists of five daily prayers according to the Sunna; the names are according to the prayer times: Fajr (dawn), Dhuhr (noon), Asr (afternoon), Maghrib (evening), and Isha' (night). The Fajr prayer is performed before sunrise, Dhuhr is performed in the midday after the sun has surpassed its highest point, Asr is the evening prayer before sunset, Maghrib is the evening prayer after sunset and Isha is the night prayer.
You will see in this explanation that the five daily prayers are not assigned a specific time but an associated event. The Dhuhr is performed in midday after the sun has passed its highest point. This is followed by the Asr, the evening prayer, sometime before sunset, then the Maghrib prayer after sunset and the Isha prayer in the night time. So there is nothing in the religion that says the workers could not have performed their night time prayers at 8:00 PM or some time after.

But these demands are just that. One fact the reporter wrote about said that in 2012 Muslims filed 785 complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In March, the Columbus, Ohio chapter of CAIR filed another discrimination on behalf of 18 Muslims who were fired from a DHL subsidiary for also stopping work to pray.

Too many companies knuckle under when faced with religion-based discrimination complaints from the EEOC, even when they may be right. Female Muslim employees who sign employment agreements to comply with company dress codes in retail businesses environments and later want to alter the dress code and wear a hijab or other form of Islamic attire have lost their jobs only to win their cases when CAIR has brought a lawsuit. Had they refused to sign the agreements they would not have been hired so they basically lied to get the job. And considering the number of Islamic attacks that have occurred in America in the last 12 years and the thousands that have happened overseas, there is nothing more unsettling than seeing someone in Muslim attire in the confined area of a small shop.
UPDATED at 7:00 PM
CAIR representative from Cincinnati interviewed on WKRC-TV channel 12 on the 6 o'clock News says that Salat prayer times must be performed within an hour of the specified time. Have checked this further and found this info from CAIR does not conform to info on Wikipedia. The following details are more concise than the previous information mentioned above. Note the precise definition for Isha night prayer which is the one that involved the Muslims at DHL. This confirms that those Muslims had several hours in which to perform this ritual and not at the specific time they chose to walk off their jobs.
"The Isha'a prayer starts when the red light is gone from the western sky, and lasts until the rise of the "white light" (fajar sadiq) in the east. The preferred time for Isha'a is before midnight, meaning halfway between sunset and sunrise."

Five daily prayers

The five daily prayers are obligatory (fard) and they are performed at times determined essentially by the position of the Sun in the sky. Hence, salat times vary at different locations on the Earth.

Fajr (pre-dawn)

The Fajr prayer starts before the sun rises, and lasts until sunrise.

Dhuhr (midday)

The Dhuhr prayer starts after the sun passes its [zenith], and lasts until Asr

Asr (afternoon)

The Asr prayer starts when the shadow of an object is the same length as the object itself (or, according to Hanafi fiqh, twice its length) and lasts till sunset. Asr can be split into two sections; the preferred time is before the sun starts to turn orange, while the time of necessity is from when the sun turns orange until sunset.

Maghrib (sunset)

The Maghrib prayer begins when the sun sets, and lasts till the red light has left the sky in the west.

Isha'a (night)

The Isha'a prayer starts when the red light is gone from the western sky, and lasts until the rise of the "white light" (fajar sadiq) in the east. The preferred time for Isha'a is before midnight, meaning halfway between sunset and sunrise.
UPDATED November 8, 2013
The arguments presented by CAIR reps contradict the facts. Here is the Islamic prayer times for Cincinnati, Ohio which is relavent to Hebron, Kentucky where the DHL facility is located. The complaint filed by CAIR with the EEOC does not mention which particular prayer time the Muslim employees were concerned with missing but the two last prayers on the date given, October 9th, are all within the one-hour time frame of the 8:00PM break period. It was the CAIR rep who admitted during the TV interview that the Muslims had one hour in which to comply with the prayer schedule.
Prayer Times Schedule
Month: 10/2013, 11-12 / 1434 A.H
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Calculation Method: North America
Juristic Method: Standard
DayOctober   Hijri   Fajr  Sunrise  Dhuhr  AsrMaghribIsha
  Tue125/116:227:341:28  4:477:218:34
  Wed226/116:237:351:28  4:457:198:32
  Thu327/116:247:351:27  4:447:178:30
  Fri428/116:257:361:27  4:437:168:29
  Sat529/116:267:371:27  4:427:148:27
  Sun61/126:277:381:26  4:417:138:26
  Mon72/126:287:391:26  4:407:118:24
  Tue83/126:297:401:26  4:397:108:23
  Wed94/126:307:411:25  4:377:088:21
  Thu105/126:317:421:25  4:367:078:20
  Fri116/126:327:431:25  4:357:058:18
  Sat127/126:337:441:25  4:347:048:17
  Sun138/126:347:451:24  4:337:028:15
  Mon149/126:357:461:24  4:327:018:14
  Tue1510/126:367:471:24  4:316:598:13
  Wed1611/126:377:481:24  4:306:588:11
  Thu1712/126:377:491:24  4:296:568:10
  Fri1813/126:387:501:23  4:276:558:08
  Sat1914/126:397:511:23  4:266:548:07
  Sun2015/126:407:521:23  4:256:528:06
  Mon2116/126:417:531:23  4:246:518:04
  Tue2217/126:427:551:23  4:236:498:03
  Wed2318/126:437:561:23  4:226:488:02
  Thu2419/126:447:571:22  4:216:478:01
  Fri2520/126:457:581:22  4:206:468:00
  Sat2621/126:467:591:22  4:196:447:58
  Sun2722/126:478:001:22  4:186:437:57
  Mon2823/126:488:011:22  4:176:427:56
  Tue2924/126:498:021:22  4:166:417:55
  Wed3025/126:508:031:22  4:156:397:54
  Thu3126/126:518:041:22  4:146:387:53



    

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Libertarians funded by big Democrat supporters help defeat Republican in Virginia governor's race.


If politics was war then the enemy forces in Virginia have just proven themselves to be much smarter than some people had thought. Actually, politics is war. Everyone of us is either an enemy combatant on one side or the other or a conscientious objector waiting to become collateral damage.  Politics is a constant battle to take control over nations, loot the treasuries, plunder its resources and enslave its people. And we are losing the battle in America because the enemy has infiltrated the leadership of our once loyal forces and created ghost armies to distract and confuse the voters. One cannot begin to take over a nation by simply replacing the leaders at the top, one needs to empower a base to support them. Some of those bases still try to operate on moral principles while others are practicing outright guerrilla warfare. How did we evolve into such machine politics that routinely turns out legions of dead voters and fraudulently inflated voter registrations and tactical diversions? Worst of all are the numbers of naive good people who refuse to acknowledge that this is happening around them while still trying to recall the good old days when everyone played fair.

In the old days, when politics was a gentleman's sport, we had the Establishment Democrats versus the Establishment Republicans. They had civilized rules of engagement such as resting on the Sabbath to gathering within the gilded paneled walls of their clubs to drink brandy and smoke Cuban cigars and boast of their accomplishments.  The major participants all learned how to become wealthy, or wealthier, from the influence that politics provided them. Then came the Russian Revolution, funded by one of the wealthiest of insiders, Armand Hammer, and the Communists came into power. Politics was never the same. Politics became ruthless, treacherous and deadly. It was no longer a gentleman's sport, it was now all about regime changes, cloak and dagger operations and mass murders.

In the old days, when life was simple we paid little attention to the changes that happened within our education system. In the days when McGuffey's Eclectic Readers were the standard and students had little need for a college education after graduating from high school, liberals and left-wing sympathizers knew full well how to instill a pro-Communist, Marxist/Socialist mentality with the halls of higher education. Thus were born the first armies of professionals that would infect our universities with their poison, the tenured professors of academia. The subsequent armies were the graduates in political science, government operations and journalism.

Then, of course, there was Saul Alinsky, a community organizer and author of Rules For Radicals who set the stage for transforming politics into outright warfare with a Field Manual for operations.

In Virginia, the governor's race was essentially a two man race between Republican Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II, a tea party favorite and Terry McAuliffe, a corrupt liberal Democrat with a past history of running profitable scams but who was also a powerful fundraiser and past National Chairman of the Democratic Party and a personal friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton. But there was also a spoiler entered in the race, Robert Sarvis, a Libertarian candidate running on a third-party line. During the course of the campaign Sarvis kept maintaining around 7-9 percent in the polls while the Republican Ken Cuccinelli II battled his way up from double digit deficits to a virtual dead heat with the Democrat. 

While I long suspected that the Democrats would be helping to finance the Libertarian candidates campaign in order to draw votes away from the Republican, the details of just such a plot only came to light on Election Day. On The Blaze web site, it was revealed that Robert Sarvis owed his entire presence in the race to a wealthy Democrat who had helped finance the petition signature drive to get him on the ballot and had also paid for some printed campaign signs and bumper stickers. 

Revealed: Obama Campaign Bundler Helping Fund Libertarian in Tight Va. Gubernatorial Race 

A major Democratic Party benefactor and Obama campaign bundler helped pay for professional petition circulators responsible for getting Virginia Libertarian gubernatorial candidate Robert C. Sarvis on the ballot — a move that could split conservative votes in a tight race.

Campaign finance records show the Libertarian Booster PAC has made the largest independent contribution to Sarvis’ campaign, helping to pay for professional petition circulators who collected signatures necessary to get Sarvis’ name on Tuesday’s statewide ballot.

Austin, Texas, software billionaire Joe Liemandt is the Libertarian Booster PAC’s major benefactor. He’s also a top bundler for President Barack Obama. This revelation comes as Virginia voters head to the polls Tuesday in an election where some observers say the third-party gubernatorial candidate could be a spoiler for Republican Ken Cuccinelli.
In times past when we had a better grip on our nation's future and when things were far less critical than they are today I would have agreed with the thoughts about voting for who you think is best. That situation did not exist in Virginia yesterday. Long before the Libertarian Party there was the NY State Conservative Party who broke away from the liberal dominated Republican Party and they have only managed to elect two candidates to Congress in the last 50 years. If you think America has another 50 years left to play with the Libertarian Party then you've been smoking too much pot. Others have already pointed out that some of the things Sarvis said were not fitting in with the Libertarian ideal. The point here is about the useful idiots who voted for the Libertarian candidate that helped the anti-gun Democrat win the election. Go over to The Blaze web site and read the proof about the wealthy Democrat who made large contributions to Robert Sarvis' campaign. The Democrats not only gathered the petition signatures to get him on the ballot, but boosted his campaign with the intention of draining votes from the pro-gun Republican. In critical elections like this one there should never have been a third-party candidate because they always split the conservative vote and swing close elections to the Democrats. Complicating the matter was the fact that Republican Ken Cuccinelli III was a staunch conservative favorite of the Tea Party and the Establishment Republicans, who have waged war on the right-wing Tea Party followers for the last few years, withheld their support.

As expected, the virulent anti-gun Democrat won the election but with the results much narrower than expected and the difference being the Libertarian spoiled the chances for the Republican. Without the spoiler Libertarian the Republican would have been elected. The Democrats also knew this and that is why the gave so much financial aid to the Libertarian Party.






Saturday, November 2, 2013

Now they tell us it was all staged. But how many gullible Democrats thought the halos were real?

 

AP editors: Obama relies on staged propaganda photos

Editors of The Associated Press condemned the White House’s refusal to give photojournalists real access to President Obama, who prefers to circulate press release-style pictures taken by his own paid photographers.

These official photographs are little more than propaganda, according to AP director of photography Santiago Lyon.

The AP has only been permitted to photograph the president alone in the Oval Office on two occasions–both in his first term–and has never been allowed to photograph the president with his staff in the office. The AP generally receives access when foreign leaders are visiting, but at other times the White House relies on its own photographers to take pictures and distribute them to the press.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/11/01/ap-editors-obama-relies-on-staged-propaganda-photos/#ixzz2jUzGAVBf

Oh my gosh, I'm shocked.


 You mean that all these photos were set up on purpose to make Barack Hussein Obama look like he had a real halo? Just how gullible do you think people are?

Was it the Democrats intention all along to make pictures like these above, shot at very creative angles,

make people think of those images of you below?


Oh, forgot to mention, ObamaCare has arrived.

But I think you already know this.

Pity the poor Democrats who voted for this total fraud and just had their healthcare plans cancelled and replaced by a government plan that now costs them 10 times as much. Yeah, your messiah did say many times that if you liked your healthcare plan you could keep it. But we told you he was a liar, didn't we.



Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Rebranding the Republican Party


One picture is worth a thousand words.

But a few words are in order.

Speaker of the House John Boehner: " I absolutely trust Barack Obama."

Arizona Senator John McCain: "Barack Obama is a good man."

Mitt Romney: "Barack Obama is a good family man."


Monday, October 28, 2013

The politics of doom and gloom is making some people very wealthy.


Entrepreneurs have always been the backbone of our Free Enterprise system. They risk their own capital to invest in their own or someone else's ideas and they deserve to wealth as their reward. We have also heard of fake charity scams, they are the dark side of entrepreneurs, some of which are quickly set up to capitalize on every disaster. Where there is money there is greed. And greed knows no boundaries because it feeds on politics from both ends of the spectrum.

Super storm Sandy devastated the southern shore of Long Island and the coastal towns of New Jersey. Both of these areas are solid Democrat strongholds so it was no wonder that Obama was quick to visit the stricken areas for photo ops and promises of help to the local politicians. The photo ops were real but the promises were just that, a lot of hot air. You just have to live in a tent city or a FEMA trailer for several months to appreciate that.

In a related story about the monumental flop in the ObamaCare healthcare.gov web site that was created by the Canadian company CGI Federal, it was also mentioned that only 1.2 percent of the $60 billion federal aid package that was allocated, ever made it to the victims of the disaster. And it was CGI Federal who was placed in charge of dispersing the funds in the Disaster Housing Assistance Program. As with the ObamaCare web site, CGI Federal got the job without any competitive bids. Michelle Obama went to Princeton with one of the company executives. And one year later major portions of the devastated areas are still piled high with refuse from the storm, businesses are still closed and homes vacant. Like any war zone, large numbers of the population simply gave up and moved away.

Maybe that accounts for why the Democrats still keep getting elected. We all know that dead people vote. The voters names from the vacant homes were still in the Board of Elections database. You would still think the voters would hold them accountable for the promises they made and didn't keep.

Entrepreneurs have also invaded the right side of politics, as well. We learned from the 2012 elections that many conservative sounding groups had purchased email lists of Republican donors and flooded their mailboxes with appeals for funds in the name of dozens of candidates. And the candidates never saw a penny of it. Now, two years later, they are at it again. This time there seems to be a new group formed every day hawking every bad political headline trying to raise money to fight it. Campaigns to fight the U.N. gun grab and ObamaCare are raising millions but the only visible results seem to be paying for fancy postal mailings with print material. The generic use of the words Tea Party has spawned dozens of copycat groups which seem to be capitalizing on the few groups that started the movement four years ago. One doesn't know any more who to send a donation to that is the real deal and who is the scammer. Some groups don't even bother to create original text material any more. I have received strings of emails from different named groups with identical text in their messages. And a year after the 2012 elections I still get a half dozen letters every day, six days a week, asking for a contribution to one thing or another.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides


Unbelievable abuses in our justice system prompt fear of living in a Police State.


The war against freedom and liberty has already begun and the battlefield is littered with innocent victims. The Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution, that inconvenient piece of paper upon which it was written, has been used for kindling to consume the Tree of Liberty. That is the state of justice in America today. I have never supported the motives and purpose of the leftist ACLU when they attacked the laws in our country but it goes without saying that we have devolved into something our Founding Fathers never considered. Or maybe they did, they talked a lot about tyranny.
Today, every law enforcement agency, from the local police and Sheriffs to State and County Police to the FBI under the direction of the Dept. of Justice has adopted the same rule regarding the use of deadly force: it is allowed whenever an officer feels threatened. Far too many stories have been reported about the exaggerated excess this rule has produced. While we have civilians like George Zimmerman using a legal concealed weapon in self-defense against a trained martial arts attacker to save his own life and subsequently brought to trial for homicide for his actions, we then have Sheriff's Deputies killing a 13-year boy for failing to drop a pellet rifle and they were justified because they felt threatened - all within the span of 10 seconds. That case is not much different than the six Cincinnati cops who had surrounded a mentally challenged man holding a brick and shot him multiple times because he also failed to "drop his weapon" when ordered and they "felt threatened". They were "following procedures", said the Police Chief. Or in Cleveland, Ohio when an incredible 137 bullets were fired during a 23-minute chase that involved five dozen cruisers that wove through residential neighborhoods before ending in gunfire. The driver Timothy Russell, 43, was shot 23 times and passenger Malissa Williams, 30, was shot 24 times. No gun or shell casings were found in their car. But at least in this case 63 patrol officers were suspended and the 13 officers who fired their weapons face a Grand Jury investigation.
But what about the number of times that cops have shot and killed little dogs who did nothing but bark at them which caused them to "feel threatened"? A retired Deputy Sheriff in Ohio riding a bicycle shot a small dog that ran up and barked at him with his .357 magnum handgun. Even when the dogs were running away from the cops, as in Prince George's County, Maryland when a SWAT team invaded the home of the mayor on a mistaken drug sting and used the family dogs for target practice, they, too, were justified because they "felt threatened". Have these atrocities been allowed to make people fear life in a Police State?
Now we have the following story from Texas. And considering the politics in this state, it is hard to believe it happened there because if it could it will happen everywhere.

Texas Judge Forced To Resign After Being Caught Texting Instructions To Assistant DA During Trial

Oh, the hilarity that is the phrase "criminal justice system." Talk to any defense attorney and they'll tell you how the deck is stacked against defendants and defense lawyers. The ideal of "innocent until proven guilty" has become little more than a disclaimer tacked onto cop-centered reality shows. Defendants are guilty until the jury is somehow tricked by the defense into handing down a "not guilty" verdict. A lot of effort goes towards dissuading defendants from even making it this far, as prosecutors will present worst-case scenarios comprised of every violation conceivable in order to get an agreement to plead guilty to a lesser charge.

The prevailing perception that the person charged is guilty, with the only answer yet to be determined is how guilty, makes defending arrestees an uphill battle. Judge (former judge) Elizabeth Coker took this uphill battle, increased the grade to 85 degrees, covered it with a sheet of ice and sprinkled it with a 50/50 blend of Teflon and motor oil.
    Elizabeth E. Coker may forever be known as the "texting judge," but her notoriety will soon be all that is left of her days on the bench of the 258th District Court of Polk, Trinity, and San Jacinto Counties. Coker signed an "AGREEMENT TO RESIGN FROM JUDICIAL OFFICE IN LIEU OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION" with the State Commission on Judicial Conduct…
    The agreement comes in the wake of a recent investigation revealing Coker texted instructions from the bench to a Polk County Assistant District Attorney who was assisting in the prosecution of a case in Coker's court.
The good news is that Coker is being stripped of all of her judicial power. Once the resignation goes through, she won't even be able to perform a wedding. The bad news is that this texting incident was only one of several alleged incidents in which Coker undermined the justice system. [Perhaps someone should have passed her, and any prosecutors dealing with her courtroom, a copy of this letter from a Texas DA warning his staff away from ex parte discussions...]
    [J]udge Coker used Assistant District Attorney Jones to privately communicate information about the Reeves case to the assistant district attorney prosecuting the case; to suggest questions for the prosecutor to ask during the trial; to ensure that a witness was able to refresh his memory and rehabilitate his testimony by reviewing his videotaped interview with law enforcement before he took the stand for the second time the following day; and to discuss legal issues pertinent to the case. in an unsuccessful effort to assist the State obtain a guilty verdict in the case…

    [t]he Commission investigated claims that Judge Coker allegedly engaged in other improper ex parte communications and meetings with Jones, other members of the Polk County District Attorney's Office, the San Jacinto County District Attorney, and certain defense attorneys regarding various Cases pending in her court; Judge Coker allegedly exhibited a bias in favor of certain attorneys and a prejudice against others in both her judicial rulings and her court appointments: and Judge Coker allegedly met with jurors in an inappropriate manner, outside the presence of counsel, while the jurors were deliberating in one or more criminal trials…
Add to all the alleged misconduct above the apparent fact that she kept using the same questionable tactics right up to her appearance before the Commission.
    [t]he Commission also expressed concerns that Judge Coker discussed the Commission's investigation and Judge Coker's written responses to the investigation with a material witness prior to that witness' testimony before the Commission in an apparent attempt to influence that witness, and that the judge may not have been candid and truthful in her testimony before the Commission when questioned about her contact with the witness...
In addition to stripping her judicial powers, the Commission also leaves her solely responsible for bearing the cost of any litigation arising from her alleged misconduct. The Commission, however, chose not to pursue these allegations in exchange for her immediate resignation. Coker utilizes that out in her public statement.
    "The Judicial Commission made no finding or determinations of fact in my voluntary resignation, and I have not admitted guilt, fault or liability in my voluntary resignation. While I could have fought these allegations, it would have involved significant time, significant expense, and disruption to everyone involved. I did not feel that was in the best interests of the taxpayers, our court system, my family or myself" Coker stated.
Yeah, that sounds about right. Coker sacrificing herself for the good of a long list of others, including the taxpayers who paid her salary and the court system she allegedly abused from a position of power. Thanks to the commission's decision, these will forever remain allegations -- the equivalent of "getting off on a technicality." If Coker ends up in court because of her previous improprieties, I would imagine she'll have to search well outside her district for a defense lawyer.
If you have any doubts about the truth in this story click the headline link and see the actual court papers.

 

Sunday, October 27, 2013

From the Noisy Room: American Betrayal – A Book Review



American Betrayal – A Book Review


By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton
 
Purchase at Amazon.com: American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character

Make sure you read:
The Rebuttal: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3

I have long admired Diana West. She is a patriot, tenacious, thorough and incredibly intelligent. Her latest book American Betrayal is my second favorite this year, coming in just behind Trevor Loudon’s The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress. But, I’m biased… full disclosure — I helped research and edit the book. ;)

As someone who has researched communists and Progressives for years, I find Diana’s book to be truthful, factual and right on the mark. Frankly, it is a breath of fresh air and those attacking her work either do not know what they are talking about or have another agenda. We have been fighting a war with these Marxists in the US for one hundred years or better. They have infiltrated virtually every office of power, our educational institutions, the media and anywhere they can get a foothold. Behind much of this is Russia and China. The Cold War never ended, it simply shifted.

West’s book is a thoroughly researched, heavily footnoted work that unveils the approach to the Soviet Union by President Franklin Roosevelt and his associates. During this era, the infiltration by communists and Soviet agents was particularly heavy and aggressive. Their insinuation into our halls of power was aided and abetted by politicians that went out of their way to appease Russia, just as they are doing today with Islam.

Diana is not just attacked by the Left and the Marxists, there are many on the Right going after her… calling her a conspiracy theorist and a nut. How very Alinsky of them. Nothing could be further from the truth. Roosevelt was no paragon of virtue and I have been attacked for writing on him in the past. Facts are facts – Roosevelt was a Progressive plain and simple. West’s other crime was speaking kindly of Joe McCarthy. She is right once again. The only thing I will say on McCarthy is that he did not finish what he started. It’s like cockroaches – we did not get all the communists and now they have multiplied many times over. They’ve basically conducted a coup from within our government and are destroying our economy, our military, our very way of life, while coddling our enemies and assisting them in their evil strategies.

Washington DC and US politics has long been riddled with Marxists. They are the ultimate occupiers.
Stanton Evans did a fantastic review of Diana’s book. Far better than I ever could. Here is a taste (then go read the whole thing):
It is for instance abundantly plain, from multiple sources of Cold War intel, that Communist/pro-Soviet penetration of the government under FDR was massive, numbering in the many hundreds. These pro-Red incursions started in the New Deal era of the 1930s, then accelerated in the war years when the Soviets were our allies and safeguards against Communist infiltration were all but nonexistent. The scope of the problem was expressed as follows in an FBI report to Director J. Edgar Hoover:
“It has become increasingly clear… that there are a tremendous number of persons employed in the United States government who are Communists and who strive daily to advance the cause of Communism and destroy the foundations of this government. Today nearly every department or agency is infiltrated with them in varying degree.. To aggravate the situation, they appear to have concentrated most heavily in departments which make policy, or carry it into effect…”
Pro-Red penetration was especially heavy in such war-time agencies as the Office of Strategic Services and Office of War Information, which were thrown together in a hurry at the outset of the conflict, with little thought for anti-Communist security vetting. But the problem was acute also in old-line agencies such as the State and Treasury departments, both of which by war’s end were honeycombed with Soviet agents.( Making matters worse, anti-Soviet officials and diplomats were in the meantime being purged from their positions.)
As you can see, Diana’s research mirrors a lot of what we have been researching on KeyWiki.org and there is much more on these agencies and individuals in Trevor Loudon’s books.

American Betrayal is a must read. It will open your eyes and allow you to see what has happened in this country as never before. You will begin to understand how we got to where we are today, not only inclusive of communist infiltration and a Progressive/Marxist agenda, but the attempted invasion by Islam that is occurring everywhere you look. The enemies within here in the US might as well be Russian operatives. We are simply lousy in our agencies with spies from Russia and China and nary a word is said on this. Background checks? That’s for white Christians. Everyone else… come on in! Not only are they endangering our way of life, these Marxists are compromising our security and our position as a world power.

Read American Betrayal… it is real history and completely removes the politically correct makeup slap-dashed on Progressive leaders. The enemies within have indeed betrayed America. Simply one of my all time favorite books.