tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8404433125239624931.post6759958936149509953..comments2023-11-30T11:29:37.454-05:00Comments on Conscience of a Conservative: Sedition Plot Thickens - Obama Officials ImplicatedOldironsideshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09629998599890229482noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8404433125239624931.post-54867915271171243912011-04-17T00:18:09.055-04:002011-04-17T00:18:09.055-04:00"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will ..."I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." is the oath all presidents have to take. This part "and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" was (and still is) considered Critical which is why it is in the oath of office.<br />Do you know our Constitution? "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States." flat out says if you are not a "... natural born Citizen of the United States"..., 35 years old and lived in this country for 14 years. <br />"Natural born" = both parents are/were United States Citizens. Read your history and see exactly what they meant. <br />Obama's does Not meet all 3 our Constitution's requirements for eligibility for presidency.<br />Plus...<br />Before he becomes president, he and all president hopefuls take the following Oath of office:<br />"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." is the oath all presidents have to take. This part "and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" was considered Critical which is why it is in the oath of office.<br />Any president or representative: v.p., senator, congressman, any other government employee who does not follow the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence is a traitor and needs to be in the court system. <br />All of them!<br />And if you do not do it, but allow it to happen you're as bad as they are.<br />I say this because of this:"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain, unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the people to alter or abolish it." - The Declaration of Independence.<br />The real important part is "... it is the Right of the people to alter or abolish it"). It does NOT say wait until the next elections. Basically it gives us, "We the People..." the job of firing them. That is right, it is OUR DUTY to fire them what ever brainwashing that you can "do nothing" you believe. This Constitution IS still the highest law of this land, everything else is held accountable to it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8404433125239624931.post-36909774134068040892011-04-16T23:11:56.862-04:002011-04-16T23:11:56.862-04:00If you think this sounds bad, read this other news...If you think this sounds bad, read this other news story.<br /><br />http://federalnewsradio.com/index.php?nid=35&sid=2345684<br /><br />"Under a White House plan, the Homeland Security Department will have far-reaching oversight over all civilian agency computer networks.<br /><br />The proposal would codify much of the administration's memo from July 2010 expanding DHS's cyber responsibilities for civilian networks.<br /><br />The White House, however, is taking those responsibilities further, according to a source familiar with the document. The administration drafted a legislative proposal to give DHS many, if not all, of the same authorities for the .gov networks that the Defense Department has for the .mil networks.<br /><br />Federal News Radio recently viewed a draft copy of the legislative proposal.<br /><br />"I have to question why the Executive branch is writing legislation," said the source, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to talk about it. "This is not a proposal or white paper like the White House usually sends to Capitol Hill. This is the actual legislation."<br /><br />The source said the 100-page document is going through interagency review. DHS sent the document around to agencies late last Friday and asked for comments by Monday. The source said few agencies had time to take a hard look at the document, especially in light of the possible government shutdown.<br /><br />Sources on Capitol Hill and in government confirmed the White House is working on such a proposal. "Oldironsideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09629998599890229482noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8404433125239624931.post-25742787109596506122011-04-16T22:34:15.141-04:002011-04-16T22:34:15.141-04:00Nelson,
This REAL BAD. Are you sure this is credi...Nelson,<br />This REAL BAD. Are you sure this is credible? Just asking.Hardnoxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00062472743694580348noreply@blogger.com