Friday, June 29, 2012

The hypothetical trial of Chief Justice John Roberts.

Yesterday we learned that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in support of a Marxist/Socialist, left-wing Democrat plan to turn healthcare in America into Socialized Medicine. Death Panels included, the devil turned out to really be in the details, so I won't waste words repeating all the bad things about Obamacare. But what turned out to be a truly shocking decision was the fact that a supposedly conservative Chief Justice named John Roberts, who was appointed to the highest court by a Republican president, joined in with four left-wing liberals to vote in support of this law. It was that single vote by the Chief Justice that tipped the scales and upheld the law.
So now, in fairness, I want to attempt to create a hypothetical trial and offer some defense for what some have called this treasonous act that Chief Justice John Roberts has been accused of. It may not be enough to simply say this highly educated man is nothing more than the Asshole of the Century. Lets try to examine all the sides before we rush to judgment.
Chief Justice John Roberts, Asshole of the Century
It goes without saying that the relationship between Barack Hussein Obama and the Republicans have reached the boiling point. Every year the Justices of the Supreme Court, along with members of both houses of Congress, attend the State of the Union address. Two years ago, Barack Hussein Obama turned his address into a pep rally and pointedly accused the conservatives on the Supreme Court of playing partisan politics because they had voted to overturn Obama's ban on corporate spending. Justice Samuel Alito was videotaped mouthing the words "Not true" as a silent reply. On September 9, 2009, while Barack Hussein Obama was addressing a joint session of Congress to outline his proposal to reform healthcare, Republican Congressman Joe Wilson pointed to Obama and shouted out, "You lie." In a manner of speaking, in yesterday's session of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Roberts also said that Barack Hussein Obama lied about his healthcare law. For the past two years Obama has been telling everyone that the enforcement provision contained in the Individual Mandate provision that ordered everyone to obtain healthcare was NOT a tax, it was a penalty. In fact, the 2700 page Obamacare law repeats this in dozens of places. So it turned out that Chief Justice John Roberts only voted to uphold Obamacare because he felt, while Obama's defense of his healthcare law was not within the Constitutional authority of Congress to regulate Commerce, it fell within the authority of Congress to apply taxes.  What is even more important is the fact that while rejecting the Obama defense's argument that the "penalty" was Constitutional, Chief Justice Roberts gave the Obama defense an argument that he felt was justified. In essence, he rewrote the wording of Obamacare by substituting "taxes" for "penalty". This would be unheard of in a court of law if a judge rejected a defense lawyer's argument and gave him a better one.
So we have Chief Justice John Roberts giving a backhanded slap to Obama by saying he did lie about the penalties. Now we have to judge the consequences of this mind game that Chief Justice John Roberts has played on the 300-million citizens of the United States of America. Among the population of our once-great country, millions of elderly Americans on Medicare will now face severe cutbacks in medical coverage because part of Obamacare is being financed by cutting 500-Billion dollars from the Medicare program. Many senior citizens will be denied medical coverage all together when the Death Panels begin to evaluate the economic benefits of keeping them alive and they will be denied coverage. There will be a shortage of doctors after Obamacare begins to cut their fees and they will simply stop practicing medicine. All these things considered, was the game of calling Obama a liar by Chief Justice John Roberts worth the tragic consequences forced on everyone else? The hypothetical jury has ruled that it wasn't. The jury has ruled that Chief Justice John Roberts is, in fact, the Asshole of the Century. 
Now we must hope that the rest of America will begin to see the truth about what these pro-Communist Democrats, who call themselves Progressives and Socialists, which are all the same thing,  are doing to our country. Now we must work to elect a veto-proof Congress controlled by Republicans who will stand up for the people and repeal this law and return our nation to the Republic it once was.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Chief Justice John Roberts: Asshole of the Century.

Those who stand too close to the light of knowledge are often blinded to the truth. You can quote me on that. The most educated people seem unable to visualize the gravity of their decisions, especially when the consequences of those decisions do not apply to themselves. So now it seems that Chief Justice John Roberts cares little about the Death Panels or the Socialized Medicine scheme that he approved in his joining with the leftists on the Supreme Court. Why? Because the health care plan that he has for himself and his family is not the Obamacare that he has forced down our throats. This is my opinion and for the time being it is protected by my 1st Amendment Constitutional Rights. Chief Justice John Roberts, in spite of his high education and vast knowledge of the law, gets my nomination for Asshole of the Century. Fox News reported his opinion as follows:
Chief Justice John Roberts, who was appointed during a Republican administration, joined the four left-leaning justices on the bench in crafting the majority decision.

"The Affordable Health Care Act survives largely unscathed," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of those justices, declared at the end of the reading, claiming the "setbacks" going forward will be "temporary blips, not permanent obstructions."

The ruling relied on a technical explanation of how the individual mandate could be categorized. Roberts, in the opinion, said the mandate could not be upheld under the Constitution's Commerce Clause. However, it could be upheld under the government's power to tax.

"The Affordable Care Act is constitutional in part and unconstitutional in part  The individual mandate cannot be upheld as an exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause," Roberts wrote. "That Clause authorizes Congress to regulate interstate commerce, not to order individuals to engage it. In this case, however, it is reasonable to construe what Congress has done as increasing taxes on those who have a certain amount of income, but choose to go without health insurance. Such legislation is within Congress's power to tax."
Roberts stressed that the decision does not speak to the merits of the law. "We do not consider whether the act embodies sound policies. That judgment is entrusted to the nation's elected leaders," he said.
Now, more than ever before, we need an absolute, veto-proof Republican controlled Congress with the backbone to stand up to the pro-Communist Democratic Party and the Marxist/Socialist imposter in the White House. Today's decision is even more reason why every American who cares about our country should VOTE REPUBLICAN in November.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.


Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The coverup is often worse than the crime.

Two major controversies are coming to a boil this week and they both involve the acts of high government officials, both  Democrats, involved in coverups. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will announce its decision on the constitutionality of Obamacare, the Socialized Medicine plan concocted by Obama's Democrat-controlled Congress. Also happening tomorrow, the House of Representatives will take up a vote to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in Contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over documents related to the Dept. of Justice's Fast and Furious gun-running operation that resulted in Border Patrol officer Brian Terry being killed with one  of the guns the DOJ allowed to be smuggled into Mexico.

Elena Kagan was Barack Hussein Obama's Solicitor General before he nominated her for the U.S. Supreme Court. The United States Solicitor General is the person appointed to represent the federal government of the United States before the Supreme Court of the United States. Elena Kagan served in the Obama administration when the Obamacare law advanced through Congress and now is on the Supreme Court bench sitting in judgment of it. Although there have been many calls for Justice Kagan to recuse herself she has adamantly refused.
“Justice Kagan should provide the American people a full explanation about her refusal to recuse herself in light of the new information about her potential involvement with Obamacare when she served as solicitor general,” Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, told WND.

“And the Department of Justice’s stonewall of our information requests shows that [Attorney General] Eric Holder is, once again, in full cover up mode,” he said today.
Now as far as the Fast and Furious investigation is concerned, it is beginning to look like the reason Holder has refused to turn of the documents to Congress is because they will show that Barack Hussein Obama was involved in the approval of the plan. So whether or not Holder becomes the sacrificial goat to protect his boss, the cover-up will continue until that Congressional subcommittee gets the evidence it subpoenaed. Chalk this one up to the long list of crimes that should culminate with charges of Impeachment against the imposter-in-chief Barack Hussein Obama. A criminal act resulting in the death of a law enforcement officer during the pursuit of his duties should warrant life imprisonment - or the death penalty. I think that either would be a fitting legacy to end Barack Hussein Obama's career.
There is little difference between a coverup and a conspiracy. The cover-up protects someone's ass from being prosecuted for a bad deed and a conspiracy is a criminal plan to commit the bad deed.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Good question: When will Obama crack in public?

When will Obama crack in public?
By Mychal Massie

At a time when many Americans can barely afford Burger King and a movie, Obama boasts of spending a billion dollars on his re-election campaign. Questioned at a recent appearance about the spiraling fuel costs, Obama said, "Get used to it" – and with an insouciant grin and chortle, he told another person at the event, who complained about the effect high fuel prices were having on his family, to "get a more fuel-efficient car."

The Obamas behave as if they were sharecroppers living in a trailer and hit the Powerball, but instead of getting new tires for their trailer and a new pickup truck, they moved to Washington . And instead of making possum pie, with goats and chickens in the front yard, they're spending and living large at taxpayer expense – opulent vacations, gala balls, resplendent dinners and exclusive command performances at the White House, grand date nights, golf, basketball, more golf, exclusive resorts and still more golf.
Expensive, ill-fitting and ill-chosen wigs and fashions hardly befit the first lady of the United States .. The Obamas have behaved in every way but presidential – which is why it's so offensive when we hear Obama say, in order "to restore fiscal responsibility, we all need to share in the sacrifice – but we don't have to sacrifice the America we believe in."

The American people have been sacrificing; it is he and his family who are behaving as if they've never had two nickels to rub together – and now, having hit the mother lode, they're going to spend away their feelings of inadequacy at the taxpayers' expense.

Obama continues to exhibit behavior that, at best, can be described as mobocratic and, at worst, reveals a deeply damaged individual. In a February 2010 column, I asked, "Is Obama unraveling? "I wrote that it was beginning to appear the growing mistrust of him and contempt for his policies was beginning to have a destabilizing effect on him.

At that time, I wrote that not having things go one's way can be a bitter pill, but reasonable people don't behave as he was behaving. He had insulted Republicans at their luncheon, where he had been an invited guest. I had speculated that was, in part, what had led him to falsely accuse Supreme Court justices before Congress, the nation and the world, during the 2010 State of the Union address.

It appeared, at that time, as if he were "fraying around the emotional edges." That behavior has not abated – it has become more pronounced. While addressing the nation, after being forced to explain the validity of his unilateral aggression with Libya , America witnessed a petulant individual scowling and scolding the public for daring to insist he explain his actions.

But during an afternoon speech to address the budget/debt, he took his scornful, unstable despotic behavior to depths that should give the nation cause for concern. Displaying a dark psychopathy more representative of an episode of "The Tudors" television series, he invited Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to sit in the front row during his speech and then proceeded to berate both Ryan and Ryan's budget-cutting plan. Even liberal Democrats were put off by the act. MSNBC's Joe Scarborough questioned the sanity of Obama's actions.

Today, criticism is coming from all sides. A senior Democrat lawmaker said, "I have been very disappointed in [Obama], to the point where I'm embarrassed that I endorsed him. It's so bad that some of us are thinking, is there some way we can replace him? How do you get rid of this guy?" ("Democrats' Disgust with Obama," The Daily Beast, April 15, 2011)

Steve McCann wrote: Obama's speech "was chock full of lies, deceit and crass fear-mongering. It must be said that [he] is the most dishonest, deceitful and mendacious person in a position of power I have ever witnessed" ("The Mendacity of Barack Obama," , April 15, 2011).

McCann continued: "[His] performance was the culmination of four years of outright lies and narcissism that have been largely ignored by the media, including some in the conservative press and political class who are loath to call [him] what he is in the bluntest of terms: a liar and a fraud. That he relies on his skin color to intimidate, either outright or by insinuation [against] those who oppose his radical agenda only add to his audacity. It is apparent that he has gotten away with his character flaws his entire life, aided and abetted by sycophants around him. ..."

With these being among the kinder rebukes being directed at Obama, and with people becoming less intimidated by his willingness to use race as a bludgeon, with falling poll numbers in every meaningful category and an increasingly aggressive tea-party opposition – how much longer before he cracks completely?

The coming months of political life are not going to be pleasant for Obama. Possessed by a self-perceived palatine mindset, that in his mind places him above criticism, how long before he cracks in public? Can America risk a man with a documented track record of lying and misrepresenting truth as a basic way of life, who is becoming increasingly more contumelious.


Monday, June 18, 2012

New Superman license plate in Ohio causes problems for Democrats and state of Hawaii.

A story appeared today in the The Plain Dealer in Cleveland, Ohio about a new Ohio license plate bearing the Superman insignia and slogan: "Ohio - Birthplace of Superman." Democrats are in a quandary because up till now they've been led to believe that their Superman, also know as Barack Hussein Obama or BO for short, was born in Hawaii; so a major tiff is brewing between these two states. These are the images that the Democrats came up with in 2008.

Ohio changes planned Superman license plate design

CLEVELAND (AP) - Plans for a Superman license plate in Ohio are being altered because the slogan doesn't match the origin story for the Man of Steel.
The story says he was born on the planet Krypton, but fans of the comic superhero know he was created by two teenagers near Cleveland in the 1930s. A nonprofit society honoring those creators proposed a license plate with the famous "S'' insignia and the slogan "Ohio - Birthplace of Superman."
The Plain Dealer in Cleveland ( ) reports DC Comics and Warner Communications were concerned about the birthplace reference, so officials plan to come up with a different slogan.
Read more here:
My suggestion to Ohio would be to put this slogan on your license plate: Ohio - Birthplace of The Real Superman. Let Hawaii deal with the other guy's image. Maybe that's where BO got his taste for the Maui Wow-wee that he enjoys smoking so much.


Thursday, June 14, 2012

Comparing Mitt Romney's record to Barack Hussein Obama.

If you listen to the commercials being broadcast on television about that Marxist/Socialist, would-be Muslim pretending to be a Christian phony named Barack Hussein Obama /aka/ Barry Soetoro, you would think that it was Mitt Romney who had made a deal with the Devil to earn his millions and not Barack Hussein Obama. And the first reality check here is the fact that it was Obama and not Romney who probably did make a deal with the Devil. Well, how about just some real facts for a change about Mitt Romney. Inconvenient facts that you won't hear from the leftist Lame Stream Media about the real Mitt Romney!   
Mitt Romney:

After going to both Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School simultaneously, he passed the Michigan bar, but never worked as an attorney.

As a venture-capitalist, Romney's first major business deal involved investing in a start-up office supply company with one store in Massachusetts that sold office supplies. That company, called Staples, now has over 2,000 stores and employs over 90,000 people.

Romney or his company Bain Capital (using what became known as the "Bain Way") would go on to perform the same kinds of business miracles again and again, with companies like Domino's, Sealy, Brookstone, Weather Channel, Burger King, Warner Music Group, Dollarama, Home Depot Supply, and many others.

Got your calculators handy? Let's recap.

Volunteer campaign worker for his dad's gubernatorial campaign 1 year.

Unpaid intern in Governor's office 8 years.

Mormon missionary in Paris 2 years.

Unpaid bishop and state president for his church 10 years.

No salary as president of the Olympics 3 years.

No salary as MA governor 4 years.

That's a grand total of 28 years of unpaid service to his country, his community and his church.  Why?  Because that's the kind of man Mitt Romney is!

And in 2011 Mitt Romney gave over $4 million to charity, almost 19% of his income....Obama gave 1%

Joe Biden gave $300 or .0013%

This is real character vs....well you know what!

Romney may not be the best representative the Republicans could have selected, but at least I know what religion he is, and that he won't desecrate the flag by grabbing his crotch during the Pledge of Allegiance, or bow down to foreign powers, or squander my money on vacations.  I know he has the ability to turn this financial debacle that the "Spending President" has gotten us into.  We didn't know that when Obama said he'd give us change, he meant nickels and dimes, and he would get the big bucks.  We won’t like all the things necessary to recover from this debt, but someone with Romney’s background can do it.

But, on the minus side, He never was a "Community Organizer", never took drugs or smoked pot.  Never got drunk. Did not associate with communists or terrorists. Nor did he attend an America-hating, anti-white church whose pastor called for God to damn the US.
And finally, if you're worried that Mitt Romney may not be the complete conservative you hoped for then help elect more Republicans to Congress. With a solid majority of Republicans in the Senate and House of Representatives there will be nothing that Obama could do to bring further damage to America.

Monday, June 11, 2012

Mark Steyn: Eternally shifting sands of Obama's biography

Mark Steyn: Eternally shifting sands of Obama's biography

Published: May 18, 2012


Syndicated columnist The Orange County Register 
It used to be a lot simpler. As E.C. Bentley deftly summarized it in 1905:
"Geography is about maps. But Biography is about chaps."

But that was then, and now Biography is also about maps. For example, have you ever thought it would be way cooler to have been born in colonial Kenya?

Whoa, that sounds like crazy Birther talk; don't go there! But Breitbart News did, and it turns out that the earliest recorded example of Birtherism is from the president's own literary agent, way back in 1991, in the official bio of her exciting new author:

"Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii."

So the lunatic theory that Barack Obama doesn't meet the minimum eligibility requirements to be president of the United States was first advanced by Barack Obama's official representative. Where did she get that wacky idea from? "This was nothing more than a fact-checking error by me," says Obama's literary agent, Miriam Goderich, a "fact" that went so un-"checked" that it stayed up on her agency's website in the official biography of her by-then-famous client up until 2007:
"He was born in Kenya to an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister."

And then in April 2007, someone belatedly decided to "check" the 16-year-old "fact" and revised the biography, a few weeks into the now non-Kenyan's campaign for the presidency. Fancy that!
When it comes to conspiracies, I'm an Occam's Razor man. The more obvious explanation of the variable first line in the eternally shifting sands of Obama's biography is that, rather than pretending to have been born in Hawaii, he's spent much of his life pretending to have been born in Kenya.

After all, if your first book is an exploration of racial identity and has the working title "Journeys In Black And White," being born in Hawaii doesn't really help. It's entirely irrelevant to the twin pillars of contemporary black grievance – American slavery and European imperialism. To 99.99 percent of people, Hawaii is a luxury vacation destination and nothing else.

Whereas Kenya puts you at the heart of what, in an otherwise notably orderly decolonization process by the British, was a bitter and violent struggle against the white man's rule. Cool! The composite chicks dig it, and the literary agents.

And where's the harm in it? Everybody does it – at least in the circles in which Obama hangs. At Harvard Law School, where young Barack was "the first African-American president of The Harvard Law Review," there's no end of famous firsts: As The Fordham Law Review reported, "Harvard Law School hired its first woman of color, Elizabeth Warren, in 1995." There is no evidence that Mrs. Warren, now the Democrats' Senate candidate, is anything other than 100 percent white. She walks like a white, quacks like a white, looks whiter than white. She's the whitest white since Frosty the Snowman fell in a vat of Wite-Out. But she "self-identified" as Cherokee, so that makes her a "woman of color." Why, back in 1984 she submitted some of her favorite dishes to the "Pow Wow Chow" cookbook, a "compilation of recipes passed down through the Five Tribes families."

The recipes from "Elizabeth Warren – Cherokee" include a crab dish with tomato mayonnaise. Mrs. Warren's fictional Cherokee ancestors in Oklahoma were renowned for their ability to spear the fast-moving Oklahoma crab. It's in the state song: "Ooooooklahoma! Where the crabs come sweepin' down the plain." But then the white man came, and now the Oklahoma crab is extinct, and at the Cherokee clambakes they have to make do with Mrs. Warren's traditional Five Tribes recipe for Cherokee Lime Pie.

A delegation of college students visited the White House last week, and Vice President Biden told them: "You're an incredible generation. And that's not hyperbole, either. Your generation and the 9/11 generation before you are the most incredible group of Americans we have ever, ever, ever produced."

Ever ever ever ever! Even in a world where everyone's incredible, some things ought to be truly incredible. Yet Harvard Law School touted Elizabeth "Dances with Crabs" Warren as their "first woman of color" – and nobody laughed. Because, if you laugh, chances are you'll be tied up in sensitivity-training hell for the next six weeks. Because in an ever-more incredible America being an all-white "woman of color" is entirely credible.

Entering these murky waters, swimming through it like a crab in Mrs. Warren's tomato mayo, Barack Obama refined his own identity with a finesse that Harvard Law's first cigar-store Indian lacked. In 1984, when "Elizabeth Warren – Cherokee" was cooking up a storm, the young Obama was still trying to figure out his name: He'd been "Barry" up till then. According to his recently discovered New York girlfriend, back when she dated him he was "BAR-ack," emphasis on the first syllable, as in barracks, which is how his dad was known back in Kenya. Later in the Eighties, he decided "BAR-ack" was too British, and modified it to "Ba-RACK". Some years ago, on Fox News, Bob Beckel criticized me for mispronouncing Barack Obama's name. My mistake.

All I did was say it the way they've always said it back in Kenya. But Obama himself didn't finally decide what his name was or how to say it until he was pushing 30. In the shifting sands of identity, he picked his crabs carefully.

"I suppose he'd had the name ready for a long time, even then," says Nick Carraway in "The Great Gatsby." "His parents were shiftless and unsuccessful farm people – his imagination had never really accepted them as his parents at all. The truth was that Jay Gatsby of West Egg, Long Island, sprang from his Platonic conception of himself... . So he invented just the sort of Jay Gatsby that a seventeen-year-old boy would be likely to invent, and to this conception he was faithful to the end."
In a post-modern America, the things that Gatsby attempted to fake – an elite schooling – Obama actually had; the things that Gatsby attempted to obscure – the impoverished roots – merely add to Obama's luster. Gatsby claimed to have gone to Oxford, but nobody knew him there because he never went; Obama had a million bucks' worth of elite education at Occidental, Columbia and Harvard Law, and still nobody knew him ("Fox News contacted some 400 of his classmates and found no one who remembered him"). In that sense, Obama out-Gatsbys Gatsby: His "shiftless and unsuccessful" relatives – the deportation-dodging aunt on public housing in Boston, the DWI undocumented uncle, the $12-a-year brother back in Nairobi – are useful props in his story, the ever more vivid bit-players as the central character swims ever more out of focus, but they don't seem to know him either. The more autobiographies he writes, the less anybody knows.

Like Gatsby presiding over his wild, lavish parties, Obama is aloof and remote: let everyone else rave deliriously; he just has to be. He is, in his way, the apotheosis of the Age of American Incredibility. When just being who you are anyway is an incredible accomplishment, Obama managed to run and win on biography almost entirely unmoored from life. But then, like Gatsby, he knew a thing or two about "the unreality of reality."


Sunday, June 10, 2012

My reply to the TEA Party activists who plan to stay home on election day.

The Patriot News in Pennsylvania ran story quoting several TEA Party activists who plan to stay home on election day because they believe Mitt Romney "is really a moderate wolf in conservative sheep’s clothing." To any and all TEA Party members who agree with this absurd plan, I have a few words for you.  You better get your heads screwed on right because the only thing you're going to do is get Barack Hussein Obama reelected.
Tea party activists say they'll abstain from voting on Election Day 

Published: Friday, June 08, 2012, 6:00 AM     Updated: Friday, June 08, 2012, 2:34 PM By ROBERT J. VICKERS, The Patriot-News

Though Mitt Romney has sewn up the Republican presidential nomination, some tea party activists remain unconvinced of his conservative credentials and plan to abstain in November.

 I have heard from various folks in the tea party that they would rather stay home,” said Ana Puig, the state director of FreedomWorks, a conservative activist training group
The Romney rejection stems from the deeply held belief by many conservatives that the former Massachusetts governor is really a moderate wolf in conservative sheep’s clothing.
Even if your feelings about Romney are correct, who would you rather have in the White House for four more years, a moderate wolf in conservative sheep’s clothing or a Marxist/Socialist, pro communist Muslim extremist masquerading as a Democrat? Even if Mitt Romney is a RINO, a Republican In Name Only, he has got to be a whole lot better than the other prospect. Not voting for a Republican is the same as giving the democrats an absentee vote.
Want to insure your bet? Go out and vote the entire Republican ticket and help elect a solid Republican Congress. With a Congress dominated by Republicans, even if Obama was to steal the election his plan to turn America into a Socialist Republic, i.e. think U.S.S.R. the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, he would be greatly hampered. And maybe, just maybe, a solid Republican majority may just find the courage to impeach him for treason.

Friday, June 8, 2012

Barack Hussein Obama has been caught in another LIE. He is a Socialist and always has been, but then we knew that all along.

Barack Hussein Obama has often been described as "the man who never was" because his entire reputation and background is a totally manufactured LIE. A lie that was designed to cover up the truth, but the truth always manages to come out. Newsmax reported yesterday that newly uncovered documentation proves that back in 1996 Obama signed a contract to join and support the Socialist group The New Party in Chicago in exchange for their endorsement for his bid to the Illinois legislature. Conservative bloggers had already uncovered the evidence back in 2008 but the leftist news media ignored it. Here is a copy of my blog post from October 2010:

Friday, October 1, 2010

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly


Bloggers Debbie Schlussel, Moonbattery and Gateway Pundit all reported that the Chicago office of the FBI conducted a terrorist sweep “that caught up Obama allies Hatem Abudayyeh and Joseph Iosbaker also snagged members of the New Party — a communist outfit with which Obama was involved in Chicago. One is Iosbaker, the other is his wife Stephanie Weiner.”
Blogger Debbie Schlussel had it first with her exclusive report: September 27, 2010, - 4:14 pm EXCLUSIVE – Who is Hatem Abudayyeh?: Meet the FBI-Raided Palestinian “Activist” & Terrorism Financier "Yesterday, I gave you the exclusive scoop about Chicago-based Palestinian Muslim “activist” and terrorist-financier Hatem Abudayyeh, who was raided by the FBI and whose many anti-war activist friends were subpoenaed for information on money they gave to Abudayyeh and the PFLP, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, as well as its connection to FARC, the South American terrorist group." But Debbie Schlussel's story focused only on the terrorist funding connections of the recipients of the FBI raid.
Moonbattery dug a little deeper: September 29, 2010, Chicago Terror Sweep Turns Up More Maniacs Linked to Obama "The same FBI terror sweep in Chicago that caught up Obama allies Hatem Abudayyeh and Joseph Iosbaker also snagged members of the New Partya communist outfit with which Obama was involved in Chicago. One is Iosbaker, the other is his wife Stephanie Weiner." 
"Via Gateway Pundit, here's Comrade Obama with some New Party friends:"
"If only the establishment media had any integrity, this swamp would have been drained back in 2008, and America would have been spared the unfolding catastrophe formerly known as Hope & Change."
Gateway Pundit: FBI Terror Targets Tied To Obama’s Socialist New Party  Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 6:21 AM "Two of the targets of last Friday’s raid against “anti-war” revolutionaries were early prominent leaders of Barack Obama’s New Party in Illinois." (more at the link) Trevor Loudon's New Zeal has more on Obama and his New Party."
Both had the more interesting slant that connected a few of those terrorists raided by the FBI had previously been connected with the Chicago group known as The New Party, a Communist organization from the 1990's that first got Barack Hussein Obama into Illinois politics.

Bloggers New Zeal and The Big Feed discovered this photo of Barack Obama and other New Party socialists including Danny K Davis (center), from the front page of New Party News, Spring 1996:
Click picture for a larger view.
photo caption: Winners! NP-endorsed candidates Patricia Martin (far left), Danny Davis (center), and Barack Obama (far right), celebrate with Chicago New Party members Ted Thomas and Ruth Schools after their victories in the Democratic Primary last month.
New Zeal, which just happens to be based in New Zealand, has compiled the world's largest collection of documented evidence on Barack Hussein Obama and is well worth a curious visit by any concerned citizens who want to know the truth. The last paragraph in the New Zeal story reads: “The New Party folded in 1998 after its voting tactics were ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The FBI is now undertaking what has become a high-profile investigation of former members of the organization. Was Barack Obama a member? Undoubtedly. Will the FBI investigate him? What do you think?”

This reminds me of the tag line on a popular new TV show this season, The Event, which says, “What do you get when you combine Lost with The X-Files and The 4400”. Well, Barack Hussein Obama could also be described as, “what you get when you combine The New Party, Democrats, Communists and the Muslim Brotherhood”
Newsmax ran this story yesterday, June 7, 2012:
Obama Joined Third Party in 1990s
Citing recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society, an article appearing in the National Review Online pointed to a document trail that “definitively establishes” Obama’s membership in the organization.

“Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party.

He also joined the New Party,” the publication reported, quoting minutes of a Jan. 11, 1996 meeting of the New Party’s Chicago chapter.

Moreover, the publication reported that a roster of the Chicago chapter of the New Party from early 1997 listed Obama as a member and referenced the Jan. 11, 1996 joining date.
Barack Obama was, in fact, a member of the socialist New Party in the 1990s and sought its endorsement for the Illinois senate--contrary to the misrepresentations of Obama's presidential campaign in 2008, and in spite of the efforts of Politico's Ben Smith to quash the story. Stanley Kurtz, author of Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism (2010), has released new "smoking gun" evidence at National Review Online. It is evidence that the mainstream media can no longer ignore--and Obama can no longer deny.
Now almost all the pieces are beginning to fall in place. We are told that Barack Hussein Obama was, in fact, a Muslim when he lived in Indonesia. And it is funny that one of Obama's current campaign ads on TV say that when he was a young boy his mother would wake him up before sunrise to go to school when in fact he was probably woken up before sunrise to say his Muslim prayers. We are told now by none other than the radical black preacher Jeremiah Wright that after their 20-year relationship in his Chicago church that he didn't think Obama ever gave up his Muslim faith. These facts are important to America because Obama has surrounded himself with Communists and radical Islamists in his administration. And Democrats across the country are trying to distance themselves from the stench of his putrid background. Now all we need is a Republican filled majority in both houses of Congress to finally begin an official investigation into who is living in The White House. When a child makes a grandiose statement that when he grows up he wants to president, we brush it off as just a youthful imagination. But when a young adult attending college tells a stranger that he is "going to be president" that makes anyone suspect that a despicable conspiracy has been in play for many years. And thoughts of a Manchurian Candidate are the first things that come to mind.
And speaking about his childhood in Indonesia, one thing stands out today is how much Barack Hussein Obama has little in common with Americans. He knows nothing about our culture and the things we respect. He does not know enough to salute the American flag or even place his right hand over his heart. Remember that famous photo of him folding his hands over his crotch during a 2008 campaign stop when they played our National Anthem? Well, he still does the same thing today.
My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides.


Friday, June 1, 2012

Assorted comments about Barack Hussein Obama: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly.

Look What Flew Over The 2011 Akron Air Show - The second photo is PERFECT

Is it any wonder that the recent primary elections have given so many Democratic Party votes to "uncommitted" delegates on the presidential line? Obama can barely hold his own against some ghost candidates and regular Democratic candidates are distancing themselves as far away from Obama's BO as possible. Well, so much for the "good". Now for the "bad" and the "ugly".
When did America become a Police State?
Have you gotten the impression watching the TV ads for Obama's campaign that he has been really tough on the enemies of America? What I'd like to know is why haven't the other critics of these commercials mentioned how the Dept. of Homeland Security has actually defined what it considers to be the enemies of America. Under the leftward direction of the Obama wanna-be dictatorship/administration, DHS has declared that ordinary American citizens who show support for 2nd Amendment rights and Pro-Life principles and even some returning disgruntled war veterans can be considered potential "domestic terrorists" and just as much a threat to America as the Taliban and al-Qaida. So while our leftist news media is boosting up the "tough on terrorists overseas" image of Obama we also have the same Predator drones flying over our homes in America that are flying in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Take a moment and read through the Dept. of Homeland Security's official list of definitions and see how they have lumped the patriots with everyone else. (U//FOUO) Domestic Extremism Lexicon  and this one (U//FOUO) Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment  Combine this with the concentration camps being constructed by FEMA and the U.S. Army job bulletin for Internment/Resettlement Specialists still listed on the U.S. Army web site
Add it to the provisions to arrest and imprison without trial of any American on U.S. soil that Obama insisted on having included in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act and you have the makings of a full-blown dictatorial police state.
DailySanity Newsletter from

Does The Tyranny End? Obama’s Secret Kill List!

OBAMA THE EXECUTIONER: Martial Law and the secret “KILL LIST”
Obama’s Marxist plot is ALREADY in motion!!!
Click here to FAX Congress now!



Over the last month, Conservative-Daily has been keeping you up-to-date on a very important story regarding President Barack Hussein Obama’s Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order that would authorize him, during PEACE TIME, to declare martial law in the United States(to read that story, click here:
This edict, signed by the President on March 16, 2012, gives Obama all the tools necessary to dissolve our Republic and create a Marxist dystopia!  That’s right!  This Executive Order would not only allow Obama to declare martial law during peacetime, but also gives him the “legal” authority to confiscate private property, nationalize the means of production, create forced worker camps, and even ration your family’s food and water!!   At any given moment, Obama could institute martial law, dissolve Congress, and finalize our march toward Communism that he started on the day he took office!! 
Don’t be fooled by the liberal media who will tell you that several other Presidents have signed similar Executive Orders; these media outlets are just providing cover for the Obama Administration.  The TRUTH is that while this Executive Order is similar to those in the past, it is different in one very fundamental way: it does NOT require a national emergency, disaster, or war to trigger the listed unconstitutional Presidential powers; President Obama can institute it at ANY time!
This week, the New York Times added a new wrinkle to the story by blowing the lid off of Obama’s top secret “KILL LIST”!!!  That’s right; the President has made a list of enemies, living overseas, for which the PRESIDENT personally gives the KILL orders.  According to the New York Times report, several of the persons listed were American citizens!!
In the first installment of the Martial Law story, Conservative-Daily warned our readers that the President believes he has the absolute right to kill American citizens overseas without due process!!  We also presented evidence demonstrating that Obama believes he can legally kill US citizens, INSIDE THE UNITED STATES, absent any due process!!!
Now we find out Obama has a secret KILL LIST, which he PERSONALLY administers, containing the names, pictures, and biographies (several of which are Americans) that Obama would like see dead.  No judge, no jury, just an executioner. WE MUST END THIS TYRANNY!!
I thank you for supporting Conservative-Daily’s efforts fighting President Obama’s unconstitutional power grab.  It is working!  Several mainstream news organizations have taken notice of our Martial Law story thanks to your grassroots efforts; these organizations are beginning to demand answers from the Obama Administration.  When a newspaper as historically liberal as the New York Times wants answers from a liberal President, it is clear that our message making an impact!!!
We can’t rest on our laurels!  We must continue to pressure the White House until the Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order is eradicated!  Obama has already demonstrated that he will use every ounce of power that he can steal from the American people; it is only a matter of time before Obama begins executing US citizens inside the United States!!
How long until Obama’s POLITICAL enemies find their way onto the Kill List?  The Kill List is a top-secret checklist of Obama’s enemies; anyone’s name could be listed.   I have spoken out publicly against the man; maybe my name is on the list. Maybe yours is, too.
Conservative-Daily also warned you that Obama has already used drones to kill American citizens abroad and that the Administration is now allowing military drone use in United States air space! (To see that article, click here:  How long until President Obama orders these drones to kill American citizens who don’t believe in his Marxist agenda?   How long until he silences dissenters?
JOIN US IN OUR EFFORTS and act now while we still have a voice!  We must demand that Congress, in fulfilling its duty as a check against executive power, legislatively veto this completely unconstitutional Executive Order!!!!
CLICK here to DEMAND that Congress vetoes President Obama’s Martial Law Executive Order on the grounds that it is unconstitutional!!!

And finally, can anything be as ugly as this? And I'm getting sick and tired of all those official photos of Obama with some symbolic halo behind his head but its the story that's really ugly. Taken from The Patriot Post. 

Alexander's Essay – May 31, 2012

Narcissism and Tyranny -- The Consequence of Executive Egocentrism

Self Service Masquerading as Public Service

"He that falls in love with himself will have no rivals." --Benjamin Franklin, 1758

Recent history records the ascension of politicians who were incontrovertibly motivated by self service masquerading as public service -- Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Albert Gore, John Kerry and John Edwards, to name a few. All of these men share tragic family histories, which indelibly imprinted them from birth. Each also has a common diagnosis for his behavior: Narcissistic Pathology Disorder (NPD).


Understanding this pathology is key to defeating our opponents who manifest it.

By definition, narcissists are deeply insecure and, consequently, have an unrelenting need to be admired by others. Their low self-esteem is often imprinted from early childhood, and for many it is associated with ineffective fathering or worse, parental abandonment. Narcissists have a grandiose sense of self and of entitlement, and they have an excessive dependence upon others for self-definition and self-esteem regulation. Though they may project an image of great confidence, it is nothing more than arrogance pretending to be confidence in a cover-up of their insecurity.

I certainly would not suggest that all children with tragic family histories are destined to develop NPD. But executive offices in both the private and public sector are frequently occupied by those driven by narcissistic pathology, those whose motivation to achieve is characterized by a lust for power and avarice, rooted in broken self esteem and the resulting obsessive need to be accepted by others.

The most malignant form of narcissism is accompanied by intelligence and charisma, which enables the deception of others in order to secure positions of power and influence.

No executive in American history has provided a more textbook archetypal case study of Narcissistic Pathology Disorder than Barack Hussein Obama, who embodied the pathology of the Left and successfully deceived the masses with his intelligence and charisma. Notably, he unwittingly outlined this deception in his second autobiographical book, "The Audacity of Hope," writing, "I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views."

Like all narcissists, however, Obama's life is a lie.

To confirm that assertion, one needs look no further than his official White House biography, which begins, "His story is the American story -- values from the heartland, a middle-class upbringing in a strong family..." There is no doubt that Obama wanted, and indeed deserved, that upbringing, but to assert that he had it could not be further from the truth.
And to further confirm the audacity of Obama's narcissism, we need only examine his adulteration of the official White House Historical Association biographies of prior presidents, where Obama has inserted his name and some related "achievement" into the historic narratives of presidents dating back to Calvin Coolidge.

For example, the "Did You Know?" section at the end of Coolidge's bio has been altered to read, "On Feb. 22, 1924 Calvin Coolidge became the first president to make a public radio address to the American people. President Coolidge later helped create the Federal Radio Commission, which has now evolved to become the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). President Obama became the first president to hold virtual gatherings and town halls using Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn, etc."

Please read the entire article here on The Patriot Post.

My name is Nelson Abdullah and I am Oldironsides. Read my bio if you want to know more.